I guess if you want to be generous you can call Mario 64, Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask a sequence of three games by some of the same developers (Miyamoto, Koizumi, Tezuka, etc) but that's more of a "run" than a trilogy.I feel like this thread backfired, but it's OK because it just turned into a list of awesome trilogies on a single console.
The DKC lineup is indeed excellent. I'd also put the first three FF "trilogies" (NES, SNES and PS1) up there. Though I feel like each trilogy has that "I guess, but only because the other two are so good" entry. You all know the ones I mean... *WW3 commences*
Its a shame no Nintendo system ever got 3 dedicated, exclusive, sequential Zelda titles. I guess you could count Zelda DX and the two Oracle games on GBC?
the more i think of it Resident Evil should def. be regarded as the best alongside mario (technically its four games) and gtaSonic 1-3/&Knuckles were better.
Same with Resident Evil 1-3.
Honestly RE only really has one misstep - 6. The rest are all solid with 2 of the greatest game of all time - REmake and RE4.
It's the best but I swear people won't admit it because it stars a big baby and a girl. Lot of people here won't know it due to age but at release that sort of shit was a huge criticism.
FF IX is up there but VIII has aged poorly and is utterly broken. You can say its choice but if you are able to make your character unstoppable by grinding some basic fish enemy near your first town it shows your game is not well designed. dont get me wrong. i still like the game because the brokenness makes it fun in a certain way.Think its FFVII-VIII-IX. Each of them have their own unique, strong identity.
GTA trilogy
RE 1-3
SMB 1-3
RE0 - REmake - RE4
DKC 1-3
Love all those, but they arguably all have a weaker game in the bunch. FF each game has someone who will ride or die for any of the three. Fun question though
Man, this thread is so full of joke answers. DKC 1 and 3 not ageing well or not being great games? Ridiculous.
Resident evil, Final Fantasy? Neither trilogies nor that good. GTA is also not a trilogy. DS Castlevanias are also not a trilogy. They have little in common and Dawn of Sorrow is part of a duology that goes over two handhelds/generations. So it can't be part of a different trilogy.
Gears and Ratchet & Clank are not that good. Mega Man is outside of X not a trilogy on one system.
Sonic and Mario are at least contenders but still not better.
The correct answer to OP is yes.
Or maybe Mega Man X
That could be the best trilogy, yes. Otherwise; Sonic 1, Sonic 2, Sonic 3.Does Shining Force 3 and it's 3 scenarios count? If so, it's that for me.
I never thought about this, but agree. DKC3 is one of my faves. Love Kiddy and Dixie.It's the best but I swear people won't admit it because it stars a big baby and a girl. Lot of people here won't know it due to age but at release that sort of shit was a huge criticism.
Asking the real question here.
It's definelty serving it's purpose, otherwise you would see a lot of Halo 1-3 and Metroid Prime 1-3 lol.
DKC is a trilogy on the SNES. More DKC games came out decades later, but they are more reboot/other story.DKC is also not a triology on one system. it was for a long time but it got expanded by returns and tropical freeze. i agree that the games are amazing
I just remembered the Castlevania DS trilogy, that's up there too.
Even if Castlevania 2 sucks, 1 & 3 are masterpieces and clown the everloving shit out of the DS games.