Sekulow is such an asshole. LOL.
The defense council was smart enough to have him speak as little as possible.
The defense council was smart enough to have him speak as little as possible.
Hes the kind of dude to play devil's advocate in high school history classSekulow is such an asshole. LOL.
The defense council was smart enough to have him speak as little as possible.
I think there is a law in place to keep their identity hidden after being verified. Whistleblowers could face backlash, lose their job, or worse once outed.Why can't/won't they reveal the whistleblower identity? Is it really for security reasons? Will we ever know who he is? Is it possible that he is not real?
Sounds like they're threatening senators with a crazy long trial if witnesses are called - and Schiff as a witness? Fucking why? Just to suss out the whistleblower? And then they want the whistleblower too? Were they fucking deaf the whole time Schiff explained why protections on the whistleblower exist? I mean, Trumps own staff if allowed to testify will corroborate the whistleblowers claims if they don't lie through their teeth...
They live in an alternate media reality where they receive different debunkings. Turns out everything the democrats ever said or did was corrupt & wrong & all about creating a degenerate society where the family is destroyed and everyone's gay. Except for the already gay people, who will ascend to ultragay. Also, George Soros faked the moon landing to erode people's faith in God.Unreal right? Every single one is regurgitating Fox news talking points that have been debunked. Duck these idiots. They all sound like dumbass hillbillies
Yeah, but that more recent count is from before Collins accidentally let the defense destroy their own arguments.That's out-of-date info, unfortunately. Witnesses are seeming unlikely now.
My bad. I got ahead of myself.That's out-of-date info, unfortunately. Witnesses are seeming unlikely now.
Why does the identity of the whistleblower matter at all? Hell, why does the motivation of the whistleblower matter at all? Let's say that he's some Soros-funded ultra liberal who's also a gay Muslim - why does that matter at all? If the thing they reported is true and an abuse of power then who cares if the whistleblower didn't like Trump before reporting it?
I think there is a law in place to keep their identity hidden after being verified. Whistleblowers could face backlash, lose their job, or worse once outed.
Why does the identity of the whistleblower matter at all? Hell, why does the motivation of the whistleblower matter at all? Let's say that he's some Soros-funded ultra liberal who's also a gay Muslim - why does that matter at all? If the thing they reported is true and an abuse of power then who cares if the whistleblower didn't like Trump before reporting it?
.Easiest way to get a summary of today's events? No idea what's gone on
Trump's Team: ask for witnesses and we will punish you for it.
Schiff: we have a responsibility to seek the truth and protect the nation.
HMMMMMM. Which side is the good guy here?
Thank God for confession and donation plates.Republicans are such unrepentant assholes. I know 100% they are not religious like they claim to be, because if Hell is real these fucks would be heading there for sure. So, so evil.
Man, the Democrats need to get better at playacting. All they had to do was act terrified about the prospect of Hunter Biden testifying as opposed to going "LOL... please proceed!" and we'd probably be getting witnesses right now.
That was always what I assumed the point of that "leak" was.McConnell may have pulled a crafty move when he claimed he didn't have enough votes this morning. It definitely kicked the GOP in the ass.
I mean, things playing out that way would be the worst possible scenario for witnesses.Why don't Dems just say ok Hunter Biden is in? They still won't support Bolton testifying.
Why don't Dems just say ok Hunter Biden is in? They still won't support Bolton testifying.
I think the allegation is already going to bury it anyways.Because even though he did nothing wrong simply testifying would hurt Biden's run at the WH. There's no way the remove Trump from office, so why allow them to use this process to hurt Trump's opponents.
Sorry it was just a suggestion of one of the C-Span callers.I wasn't able to watch / listen. What was the answer to that question?