Or maybe it didn't fundamentally change the world and you wish it did?
What does this even mean
Or maybe it didn't fundamentally change the world and you wish it did?
Remembering the time when B-Dubs made a very insensitive post towards one of my partners earlier this year and it made her cry. I'm not ever going to let that go. (And if you're wondering the "It's so frustrating" part was in context of awful trans news going on in the US. He felt the need to show little class with "You're frustrated?")man full offense but if you werent the general manager of this forum, you wouldve copped a warning/ban for hostility for this post if not an earlier one. every post of yours in this thread is dripping with smug contempt, is at a level of antagonism the posts you're replying to dont warrant & are inventing sleights that arent in the posts you're responding to (ie claiming the OP thinks the world is "destroyed"). And its not just this thread -- this seems to be your MO in every thread Ive seen you in recently that isnt about forum policy (and even then those posts tend to contain some dig about how the average user on this forum is jackass you dont look forward to handling).
I dont know if its this forum or something else in your life but it seems like you need a big break from something. Taking the position in every thread you're the rational correct voice and then angrily lashing out anyone who says something different (who then have to walk eggshells around you because you're high on the proverbial food chain) isn't a sustainable attitude. I hope you find what you need to take a break from and you're able to get it.
Thank fuck because I thought as an introvert the lockdown wasn't going to affect me but it fucked me up bad mentally
I honestly love that everything is back to "normal" in that I can go to to a restaurant, bar and travel internationally without worrying about the spectre of COVID (and before you comment about long COVID we have vaccines and treatments that have been studied to prevent long COVID significantly)
I'm tired of pausing my life.
nonsense. we do not have any reliable long covid or post viral treatments, and more and more people are suffering from and will continue to get long covid until we have a large chunk of our population disabled. will that change anything? doubtful. this thread demonstrates just as many others that humans are inherently selfish creatures who cannot see past their own eyes when it comes to societal issues.
just in the past few months 2 of my friends have been disabled in one way or another by "living their lives" and not healing from their covid infections. they can't even get into the few long covid rehab programs that do exist because they were not eligible for pcr testing and those programs require it. they cannot get any kind of answers for if or when they get better. one of them has developed arthritis in their joints, and the other can barely get around without getting tired and dizzy. there are millions of people like them worldwide, and there will be millions more. enjoy your bars and mask-free travel.
man full offense but if you werent the general manager of this forum, you wouldve copped a warning/ban for hostility for this post if not an earlier one. every post of yours in this thread is dripping with smug contempt, is at a level of antagonism the posts you're replying to dont warrant & are inventing sleights that arent in the posts you're responding to (ie claiming the OP thinks the world is "destroyed"). And its not just this thread -- this seems to be your MO in every thread Ive seen you in recently that isnt about forum policy (and even then those posts tend to contain some dig about how the average user on this forum is jackass you dont look forward to handling).
I dont know if its this forum or something else in your life but it seems like you need a big break from something. Taking the position in every thread you're the rational correct voice and then angrily lashing out anyone who says something different (who then have to walk eggshells around you because you're high on the proverbial food chain) isn't a sustainable attitude. I hope you find what you need to take a break from and you're able to get it.
fyi this is a super priviledged take. not a call-out (the things that have changed are easy to overlook), but take for example immuno-compromised people. they've had it rough before but now?
Yeah it's complete nonsense. A whole lot of "follow the science" folks really don't want to follow the science anymore because they disagree.
can't find much when it comes to reliable information or research on the topic
I feel in general Covid brought the absolute worst out of certain groups and its been full throttle since.
treatments that have been studied to prevent long COVID significantly
This is an extremely bad faith interpretation of b-dubs post that has now completely derailed the thread. Congrats.
I see long covid talked about a lot here (and on Reddit) but really can't find much when it comes to reliable information or research on the topic. It doesn't help that people online say their long covid symptoms range from like…difficulty breathing to heat intolerance.
I've personally never met someone with long covid and most of the people I know have had covid so I'm curious to read what's out there if you have anything.
Yeah it's complete nonsense. A whole lot of "follow the science" folks really don't want to follow the science anymore because they disagree.
Mask efficacy (especially for non-fitted, under-6-donnings n95s which make up 99+% of masks I saw during the mandates) is greatly overstated and compared to the vaccine is a weak tool for covid prevention.
Do I wish more people got vaccinated? Sure. But at this point, Covid is a part of life - get vaccinated, get your boosters, and protect yourself from infection by avoiding crowds if you're particularly at risk. It's never going away, and for the most part seems to be well-treated by vaccines and treatments like Paxlovid. For the good of everyone's mental health the world has moved on, the risk of Covid is no longer worth the sacrifice.
Yeah it's complete nonsense. A whole lot of "follow the science" folks really don't want to follow the science anymore because they disagree.
Covid was always going to become endemic. Lockdowns were to prevent the collapse of our healthcare system, which mission accomplished. Mask efficacy is greatly overstated and compared to the vaccine is a weak tool for covid prevention.
Do I wish more people got vaccinated? Sure. But at this point, Covid is a part of life - get vaccinated, get your boosters, and protect yourself from infection by avoiding crowds if you're particularly at risk. It's never going away, and for the most part seems to be well-treated by vaccines and treatments like Paxlovid. For the good of everyone's mental health the world has moved on, the risk of Covid is no longer worth the sacrifice.
if you define science to mean "only things I agree with" then ofc you're right.
Oh GOD.This is an extremely bad faith interpretation of b-dubs post that has now completely derailed the thread. Congrats.
believe it's a total fantasy to imagine that a 9-month lockdown in any country would've helped get rid of this thing, let alone be worth the societal cost that it would entail, but i would love to read a credible study that says otherwise.
it was very clear early on that any top-down measures would work as delaying tactics rather than an eradication strategy.
lol nothing was detailed. that community manager demonstrated the exact way in which covid emboldened people to wear their selfish anti-social behaviour even more on their sleeves. which is literally one of the ways in which the world was fundamentally changed. "fuck you got mine" got legislated into right wing influenced laws ending lockdowns.
Accusing a complete stranger of having privileges they do not have is extremely rude.
Many people who are immunocompromised and have chronic health conditions have become completely jaded
lmao nope you don't get to say "I believe," assert an opinion as fact, and then demand sources from me to change your opinion. it works exactly the other way around:
you said very confidently and without evidence that science does not support the position. you show me your sources to back that up.
well, i kind of think the burden of scientific proof is on the people suggesting it would've been a good idea to lock people in their homes for nine months, but okay!
just to be clear, i think lockdowns were a totally reasonable plan early on to do whatever could help slow the spread when healthcare systems were strained. it was never imposed here in japan, but people definitely weren't going out a whole lot in march/april 2020 so the effect was likely similar at that point. in hindsight, though, it absolutely is not clear that enforcing them as policy had any significant effect anywhere. look at the death rates in places like japan and sweden relative to their surrounding regions, as well as the clearly ineffectual second lockdown in the UK in late 2020.
in the US in particular, there is little correlation between lockdown policy and overall death counts pre-vaccine. florida's death rate in 2020 was lower than california's. again, every state is demographically and geographically different, so direct comparisons are difficult — obviously new york's terrible results can largely be attributed to its denser population, for example. but the evidence would be clear if the data was clear, and it simply isn't.
happy to hear counterpoints but i don't know how anyone can take a global view of this pandemic and believe that any single lockdown could've been the thing to make a difference, let alone that enforcing one for almost an entire year would have been a good idea.
you have chosen to completely ignore the fact that hospitals were melting down. it's interesting how that one factoid alone blows apart this idea that lockdowns did no good at all. people were being triaged in makeshift tents in the parking lots of hospitals before lockdowns started. why are you not factoring that in?
just to be clear, i think lockdowns were a totally reasonable plan early on to do whatever could help slow the spread when healthcare systems were strained.
did you not read the sentence where i said
or?
i was responding to someone who said it would've been a good idea to impose a lockdown for the whole of the 2020 calendar year. there's no scientific case for that.
Specifically talking about the 1918 outbreak.are you talking about the same H1N1 that was having an outbreak, a major world event killing people, as recently as 2009? surely 2009 is not a footnote in history?
I did miss that, you are right.
where I lived the second lockdown happened because hospitals had reached breaking point again after a new variant emerged. and then the third lockdown happened when another new variant emerged.
so even your train of thought says that the second and third lockdowns were valid. that's good.
well, i kind of think the burden of scientific proof is on the people suggesting it would've been a good idea to lock people in their homes for nine months, but okay!
just to be clear, i think lockdowns were a totally reasonable plan early on to do whatever could help slow the spread when healthcare systems were strained. it was never imposed here in japan, but people definitely weren't going out a whole lot in march/april 2020 so the effect was likely similar at that point. in hindsight, though, it absolutely is not clear that enforcing them as policy had any significant effect anywhere. look at the death rates in places like japan and sweden relative to their surrounding regions, as well as the clearly ineffectual second lockdown in the UK in late 2020.
in the US in particular, there is little correlation between lockdown policy and overall death counts pre-vaccine. florida's death rate in 2020 was nearly 20% lower than california's. again, every state is demographically and geographically different, so direct comparisons are difficult — obviously new york's terrible results can largely be attributed to its denser population, for example. but the evidence would be clear if the data was clear, and it simply isn't.
happy to hear counterpoints but i don't know how anyone can take a global view of this pandemic and believe that any single lockdown could've been the thing to make a difference, let alone that enforcing one for almost an entire year would have been a good idea.
Remembering the time when B-Dubs made a very insensitive post towards one of my partners earlier this year and it made her cry. I'm not ever going to let that go. (And if you're wondering the "It's so frustrating" part was in context of awful trans news going on in the US. He felt the need to show little class with "You're frustrated?")
Odd sentiment considering how many people are suffering from mental health issues now that "the world has moved on". Almost like trying to force everyone to move on without addressing the actual underlying issues isn't the best strategy.For the good of everyone's mental health the world has moved on
Are to implying that these mental health crises were caused or worsened by letting people go outside again?Odd sentiment considering how many people are suffering from mental health issues now that "the world has moved on". Almost like trying to force everyone to move on without addressing the actual underlying issues isn't the best strategy.
As Social Lives Resume, a Mental Health Crisis Continues: Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University
A national survey conducted by IPR political scientist James Druckman confirms the pandemic’s lingering impact on mental health for all Americans, but in particular for young adults: While 18- to 24-year-olds say they are going out more, their overall levels of depression have not fallen as much...www.ipr.northwestern.eduMost employees say their well-being has worsened or stayed the same — but their bosses disagree: new survey
"This shows that executives are disconnected from the reality of the workforce," said Dan Schawbel, the managing partner of Workplace Intelligence.www.cnbc.comRise in psychological distress in young adults - survey
Researchers say the pandemic and cost of living crisis have contributed to worsening mental health.www.bbc.com
No, I'm saying that the pandemic has aggravated these types of problems and because we as a society are so eager to pretend we didn't just go through a collective traumatic experience that fundamentally changed our psychology (ie the premise of the thread), things aren't getting better, despite often appearing so on a surface level because we have festivals and bars again.Are to implying that these mental health crises were caused or worsened by letting people go outside again?
I don't think it's hard to be good and good to others. It's really easy.
Must be where you live then? Not sure.
I took a step back on this response and slept on it in order to not react. However, it honestly still bothers me and I need to say something.You know, I've never had someone try and bludgeon me with my own condition before. Congratulations. Turns out things have changed, people are bigger jackasses than ever.
I'm so sorry to read that, I feel for you. The pandemic really showed a whole different side of society that I don't think we're ever recovering from.
Facts. Let me clarify that I am not or was not against lockdown to make sure hospitals were not overwhelmed/to mitigate spread of a novel virus with no treatments at the time. I'm against this ridiculous notion of doing it for some crazy long amount of time (1 year) to eradicate a highly infectious respiratory virusi'm not against lockdowns, i'm against the "if only we'd locked down for <insert period of time> we could've eradicated this thing!" mindset.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...finds-paxlovid-may-cut-the-risk-of-long-covidyou're gonna need to cite several sources before that comment has any merit.
In the study, long COVID was defined as developing one or more symptoms — including heart issues, blood disorders, fatigue and trouble breathing — one to three months after testing positive. By these metrics, patients that took Paxlovid were 26% less likely to develop long COVID.
The November 2022 study of 56,000 people with COVID found that the more than 9,000 who took Paxlovid in the first five days of their infection had a 25% lower risk of long COVID symptoms, including heart disease, blood disorders, fatigue, liver disease, kidney disease, muscle pain, neurocognitive impairment and shortness of breath.
People don't want to hear about it anymore, the losses have been accepted and they want their normal back. Complete selfishness and denial.
What do you want people to do? Do you think after 3 years we should still be in lock down?
um yeah that's literally the problem. it's a novel disease which the world did not take the time to properly study and understand before we all went back to business as usual. that's one of the things OP is talking about as being one of the fundamental changes.
This is a good starting point in terms of broad strokes, but honestly the research is in its infancy and treatment of its symptoms (let alone the underlying causes) are not in any kind of positive state. That's part of the frustrating aspect about watching people go head-long into constant repeat infections.Post-COVID Conditions
Some people experience new or ongoing symptoms lasting weeks or months.www.cdc.gov
Masking in indoor spaces makes sense. It doesn't make sense in restaurants or bars for obvious reasonsAs a severely immunocompromised person, I don't really wish for lockdowns anymore. They're not practical to maintain at this point anyhow. But I do wish some safety precautions were still taken, like wearing masks in a public/crowded place and social distancing when possible. In the midwestern part of the US where I am, literally all of this has been abandoned. Public transportation doesn't have anyone masking up anymore. Social distancing in places where it would be practical (such as lines or in restaurants) is non-existent. Unsurprisingly, the first time I got COVID was after all the restrictions were removed and everyone tried to pretend things were completely back to normal. It nearly killed me.
Ye, once people heard the fatality rate was around 1% for Covid these people went ham pushing back on even the most mild mitigation efforts such as politely asking them to wear a mask. I really worry what will happen if we get an unexpected new disease circulating in the near future with like, a 5% rate. The US would stand no chance and we'd be ravaged by the consequences of it.Covid showed me how fucking selfish people are. So many people putting "fuck you got mine" on full display, with no regard at all for the health of others. People can't even use masks or wash their hands and instead complain that they have to be decent people, for fucks sake.
Then there's companies trying to tear down WFH, and there's all kinds of people who don't want to admit that long Covid exists and disables people.
The worst of it all though, is seeing how fucking badly immunocompromised people are treated. People will tell immunocompromised people to "just stay home then" because people refuse to follow basic Covid precautions anymore. They'd rather we all go "back to normal" and pretend like nothing happened, and it's the fault of disabled and immunocompromised people for reminding them that not everyone has that same luxury.