Lmao no. That jock text is incredibly telling, dude probably has a /pol/ tab open at this very moment.I think it's entirely possible that this guy has grown and matured since making those comments.
Lmao no. That jock text is incredibly telling, dude probably has a /pol/ tab open at this very moment.I think it's entirely possible that this guy has grown and matured since making those comments.
Again, until he proves otherwise, the victims of racism, Black people and Jews in this case for just existing, can assume he will never change until he proves otherwise.Mmm no, thats not what I said, and I'm not going to take your strawman bait.
I responded to a post where someone definitively said "He won't change" — lol how could someone possibly know that? It illustrates how so far up people's own asses are on the internet. He may or he may not. The kid made some dumb mistakes and hopefully it changes his course as an adult.
Harvard has a responsibility to protect their students from flagrant racists.
If there's a moderate likelihood this kid is a flagrant racist (which is the case), it would endanger other students to share a classroom with him.
wana party up for some fortniteWhat the fuck does "I will reach out to minority communities" even mean for an 18 year old lmao
The good news is, he's White and from a wealthy family, and he already has connections, including a no doubt sympathetic Trump administration. Dude will be fine. These racists teens always seem to be.For sure, not only the responsibility but the right to refuse anyone I believe under these circumstances.
"Harvard reserves the right to withdraw an offer of admission under various conditions," Fitzsimmons wrote to Kashuv, "including 'if you engage or have engaged in behavior that brings into question your honesty, maturity, or moral character,'"
I definitely don't think he has the right to go to any school and 2 years isn't long enough to prove he has changed.
I just don't want to condemn the guy for life at 18-19, see if he uses this as fuel for a platform or if he actually does change as a person in the coming years.
Hindsight apologies don't mean squat.
It's also weird people are trying to say his only racist actions are from when he was 16 and clearly he's grown since then while conveniently ignoring he's part of TP USA and buddied up with Trump. Of course Harvard can't point to those examples as reasons for rejecting him but everyone else can and should point out that he's still a flagrant racist.Even people who aren't half as invested in far-right ideology as he is haven't made a complete 180 that easily, so I don't know what kind of miracles people are expecting when his trajectory for the near future is pretty clear.
Harvard has a responsibility to protect their students from flagrant racists.
If there's a moderate likelihood this kid is a flagrant racist (which is the case), it would endanger other students to share a classroom with him.
Harvard has a responsibility to protect their students from flagrant racists.
If there's a moderate likelihood this kid is a flagrant racist (which is the case), it would endanger other students to share a classroom with him.
The good news is, he's White and from a wealthy family, and he already has connections, including a no doubt sympathetic Trump administration. Dude will be fine. These racists teens always seem to be.
This start of the thread is pretty funny seeing people going soft on the kid because they thought he was an activist for gun control, then when they realized he's pro-gun and met with Trump instantly throw him under to the wolves.
Oh, not only is he racist but he's Steve Bannon racist?For those unfamiliar:
"Kashuv became director of high school outreach of the pro-Trump group Turning Point USA and gave speeches about gun rights, until his resignation in May 2019. Governor-elect of Florida Ron DeSantis, a Republican, included Kashuv on his Transition Advisory Committee on Public Safety.
Following the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, Michael Gruen, an "influencer marketer", noticed Kashuv's posts on Twitter and approached him offering to help him get his message out. With the help of former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, former White House press secretary Sean Spicer, and Daily Wire editor Ben Shapiro, meetings on Capitol Hill were set up for Kashuv. During his visit, Kashuv met with President Trump, Melania Trump, and several other politicians including Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senator Orrin Hatch."
It's not a "stupid mistake."It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
It was less then 2 years ago. He runs around with Noted racists in the Turning Point USA Organization. He hasn't changed shitIt's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
Try reading the thread before making statements like these.It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
"Racists are fine as long as they're on our side" basically.This start of the thread is pretty funny seeing people going soft on the kid because they thought he was an activist for gun control, then when they realized he's pro-gun and met with Trump instantly throw him under to the wolves.
It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
When I first saw the headline I was kind of sad since I assumed it was one of the gun control activists and wanted to see which one. When I realized it was the gun nut, I honestly just felt like that made more sense to me. Not everyone immediately went soft on the kid and ignored the racism (though you're right that too many did); I just waited to post until I knew the situation.This start of the thread is pretty funny seeing people going soft on the kid because they thought he was an activist for gun control, then when they realized he's pro-gun and met with Trump instantly throw him under to the wolves.
It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
What opinion is *puts on reading glasses* "You will not replace us", Nigger NIgger Nigger Nigger Nigger, I am getting good at typing Nigger", or "Kill jews" serving as a counterpoint to?Not to drag this off-topic, but this is quite reminiscent of the situation my university was in last year (and still is, I guess, since the individual in question still studies here):
The LSE quite literally accepted the face of the Charlottesville rally as a postgraduate student. It was a matter of significant debate among staff and students. Notably, the post-colonialist theorists came out strongly in favour of the guy being allowed to stay on as a student - which is an unexpected development.
In some ways, the LSE situation is more egregious than Harvard simply because it harbours large numbers of international students, particularly PoC and Muslim students - including large numbers from Syria, South-East Asia and Africa. The issues really came down to the following points:
a) The LSE, much like Harvard, is (historically-speaking) guilty of both accepting students and funding from less-than-reputable sources. In the LSE's case, it famously accepted Muammar Gaddafi's son and large amounts of money from the regime.
b) The simple question of whether education should be barred from individuals based purely on political beliefs and the attendant question of whether tertiary education, particularly at an elite institution, is a right or a privilege.
c) The question of the benefit of a dissenting opinion in a university space. I can't speak for Harvard but LSE is, I would say - quite left leaning overall, despite its reputation for producing staunch capitalists. Many of its IR, pol sci and anthopology students tend to adhere closely to post-colonialist, queer and feminist viewpoints. Several ostensibly post-colonial academics made the argument that the best way of teaching students to confront fascism is to place them in a space where they are forced to confront it directly.
He was director of high school outreach for Turning Point USA until last month.It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
Please read the rest of the threadIt's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
If you look up the address from the Harvard letters, it doesn't look like his family is wealthy at all. They live in a modest house that is like half a block from a six lane highway.The good news is, he's White and from a wealthy family, and he already has connections, including a no doubt sympathetic Trump administration. Dude will be fine. These racists teens always seem to be.
He'll literally have a job for the rest of his life just based off the aggrievement from this event. Some Billionaire will pay him to seem "reasonable" about how 'THE LEFT THREW ME AWAY' (lol at the notion that Harvard of all places is any kind of moral barometer) for the next decade.If you look up the address from the Harvard letters, it doesn't look like his family is wealthy at all. They live in a modest house that is like half a block from a six lane highway.
The notion that this guy is now "condemned for life" is still utterly ridiculous though.
It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
Yeah, I click this thread and I'm thinking "well that's not good, maybe he's just a dumb kid and he's just been surrounded by a lot of shock humour and hasn't reflected on it", then I scroll down a little bit and helloThis start of the thread is pretty funny seeing people going soft on the kid because they thought he was an activist for gun control, then when they realized he's pro-gun and met with Trump instantly throw him under to the wolves.
What opinion is *puts on reading glasses* "You will not replace us", Nigger NIgger Nigger Nigger Nigger, I am getting good at typing Nigger", or "Kill jews" serving as a counterpoint to?
It's almost like people are capable of making stupid mistakes in their life.
Is this really the way we want the world to be run? Is anyone actually proud of everything they've ever said as a teenager?
He'll mysteriously end up "funding" a high level production studio with a full staff "by himself" or "with your help".Harvard is 💩 as an elite oligarchic institution but this Kushev kid sounds borderline alt right and just cashing in on being in Parkland when the shooteing happened. He hasn't changed, he just switched his grift but he sounds like a future Ben Shapiro.
Do we, though?we have to come up with a better argument than 'he is a shitbag, ergo he should not be accepted into a higher education institution by default'.
Why can't shitbags live with the conquences of their actions?Arguably, in the present case, we would be referring to his pro-gun views and presumably the racist views associated with Turning Point USA.
To be clear, I am not advocating that he should be given a place. I am simply pointing out this is far from the first incidence of this dilemma since the inauguration of Trump's America and that we have to come up with a better argument than 'he is a shitbag, ergo he should not be accepted into a higher education institution by default'.
How'd someone this stupid get into Harvard in the first place?
I am simply pointing out this is far from the first incidence of this dilemma since the inauguration of Trump's America and that we have to come up with a better argument than 'he is a shitbag, ergo he should not be accepted into a higher education institution by default'.
He has advocated for schools to eliminate gun-free zones, and for policies allowing teachers and school staff to be armed.[18] He does not believe a ban on assault weapons or high-capacity magazines would eliminate mass shootings, focusing instead on failures by "the cowards of Broward", referring to the Broward County Sheriff's Office deputy who did not go inside the school while the shooting was occurring.
Huh?Arguably, in the present case, we would be referring to his pro-gun views and presumably the racist views associated with Turning Point USA.
To be clear, I am not advocating that he should be given a place. I am simply pointing out this is far from the first incidence of this dilemma since the inauguration of Trump's America and that we have to come up with a better argument than 'he is a shitbag, ergo he should not be accepted into a higher education institution by default'.
Just one, but he was a good guy. Smart, too, as one would hope.