• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

luca

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,560
Mine is a bit of a mix between the two.

1. Spider-Man
2. Spider-Man 2
3. Spider-Man: Homecoming
4. Spider-Man: Far From Home
5. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
6. Amazing Spider-Man 2
7. Amazing Spider-Man
8. Spider-Man 3
9. Venom

I've always felt Spider-Man 2 was more of a bore than its predecessor (not to say it's outright boring, just maybe has a less interesting villain to me). While I agree with Business Insider that Homecoming is a better movie than Far From Home. Homecoming just does tension much better, the villain is more three dimensional, and its comedic timing hits better than that of FFH. While FFH is a more fun ride because of its explosive action and visual effects, it also has awkward humor that is more hit and miss and a villain end-goal that just doesn't work as much as that of Vulture.

While I loved Into the Spider-Verse at the cinema - and it's definitely stunning visually and has the best comedy of all of them - I've just found myself having a hard time rewatching it. I think it has to do with me never really liking the concept of multiple Spider-Men, and that the visuals can be "a lot" sometimes. I absolutely love a lot of things about Into the Spider-Verse, but it's just been a hard rewatch.

And I've always been more entertained with ASM2 than ASM1. I kind of have "somewhat" of the same feel between Spider-Man 2 and ASM1 in that I don't find the villain that interesting. But the bore bleeds much more into the whole movie in ASM1's case to me, whereas Spider-Man 2 can be very interesting. I also loved the climax of ASM2 with Gwen's fate, and the relationship between her and Peter is still the strongest of them all to me. Spider-Man 3 had a solid first hour, but then it hits the fan.

Venom is just shit.
 
Last edited:

MisterR

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,463
The Raimi films are all, even Spider-Man 3, better than MCU films. Those are boring, assembly line nothingness. They are at least competently made, although completely soulless, so I'll put them above the Amazing films, which are pure dreck. Haven't seen Spider-verse yet.
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,865
I would have thought that now we have a good Tom Holland Spiderman film with Far From Home, that we don't have to pretend Homecoming wasn't self-serving shit anymore.

I feel like there must be another version of Spider-Man 2 that I've never seen for it to be so massively overrated.

Spider-Man is nearly mute in the suit.
People love Molina's Ock but what does he even want in that movie? It doesn't matter! He's nothing like Doc Ock from the comics and I don't think it improved on the character at all.
The action is truly awesome but come on

It was never as amazing as people make out, but the worshiping of it is mostly a backlash to people putting it down and calling it shit just to prop up MCU Spiderman.

Like you can like your new Spiderman better, but telling people the Spiderman they loved and grew up with as a kid is bad because of some arbitrary character bullet point was missing (as many people here have been prone to do when we got a S2 thread every last week last year) is gonna get a reaction.
 
Last edited:

Radd Redd

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,045
Even they know those two Amazing Spider-Man movies were straight trash. I can't figure out what Sony was going for with Garfield.
 
Oct 31, 2017
6,748
You can nitpick any movie like this

Some of those are nitpicks but enough of them aren't

Why is this "one of the greatest villains ever" controlled by his arms?


In the comics, Doc Ock is simply a bad man. He's not mind controlled by this own inventions. He's a man granted great power who uses it irresponsibly; there is no need to give him a wife they kill off AND make him under the control of the unnecessary artificial intelligence from the metal arms he invented.

Really, how is he one of the greatest movie villains when he doesn't even have the agency to fully be a bad guy?

Nevermind that whatever he wants to do (create a mini-sun in the middle of NYC) is just dumb as fuck on every level.

What's even the ideological conflict between Spider-Man and Doc Ock in that movie? some contrived shit about love?
 
Oct 31, 2017
6,748
I would have thought that now we have a good Tom Holland Spiderman film with Far From Home, that we don't have to pretend Homecoming wasn't self-serving shit anymore.



It was never as amazing as people make out, but the worshiping of it is mostly a backlash to people putting it down and calling it shit just to prop up MCU Spiderman.

Like you can like your new Spiderman better, but telling people the Spiderman they loved and grew up with as a kid is bad

and that's the main reason why the film is overrated as much as it is. We all saw it as kids/teenagers and too many refuse to realize that it's not the best thing evar that's never gonna be topped.

The second time I saw Spider-Man 2 in theaters I had all these same problems, it has nothing to do with the MCU or whatever fanboy shit you want to make it about.
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
18,829
I really can't understand how anyone can like Tobey's Spiderman after Holland and Insomniac's PS4 take on the character. Hell, even Garfield Spidey would be better if it wasn't for Peter Parker crying every 15 mins.
 
Oct 25, 2017
19,165
Some of those are nitpicks but enough of them aren't

Why is this "one of the greatest villains ever" controlled by his arms?


In the comics, Doc Ock is simply a bad man. He's not mind controlled by this own inventions. He's a man granted great power who uses it irresponsibly; there is no need to give him a wife they kill off AND make him under the control of the unnecessary artificial intelligence from the metal arms he invented.

Really, how is he one of the greatest movie villains when he doesn't even have the agency to fully be a bad guy?

Nevermind that whatever he wants to do (create a mini-sun in the middle of NYC) is just dumb as fuck on every level.

What's even the ideological conflict between Spider-Man and Doc Ock in that movie? some contrived shit about love?
This is just a silly complaint. The success of Ock as a villain is how he relates to Peter's personal failures. He is everything Peter wants to be and everything he uses excuses to not try to be. The early scenes with him perfectly set up what a good and successful man he is and the rest of the movie is Peter trying to get him back to that point after his downfall.

Besides that the arms have their own rudimentary intelligence but it's clearly Ock's own paranoia and arrogance that's being played on to drive the plan forward.
 

rude

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,812
A great example of just how badly written Far From Home is, is how it handled the spider-sense thing. Peter not having it and regaining it to fight Mysterio was such a stilted non event compared to the arc Peter went through of losing and regaining his powers in 2.

The MCU stuff just isn't there emotionally.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,646
I think I would rank them as:

1. Spider-Man 2
2. Homecoming
3. Into the Spider-Verse
4. Far From Home
5. Spider-Man
6. The Amazing Spider-Man 2
7. The Amazing Spider-Man
8. Spider-Man 3

SM2, Homecoming, and Spider-Verse are fantastic films. Far From Home is great, my first impression would be to put it a little above the top tier, but I still thought it was really fun and adore all the Peter/MJ stuff. I wouldn't mind a movie of just Pete, MJ, and Ned navigating teenage life, superheroics be damned.

Big drop off after #5 though. Tbh even SM1 has fallen a bit in my view... it feels very dated in a lot of respects, and not just in terms of, say, the Goblin outfit, but the general characterization of Peter. His physical inability to walk to Mary Jane feels like an exaggeration of the character's awkwardness. This movie will always have a place in my heart like the 89 Batman movie, but like that film it's hard to deny that parts of it -- both aesthetically and narratively -- just don't hold up as well anymore.

ASM2 is a movie I kind of like as a whole for some reason despite its many individual shitty parts. ASM1 was a more disappointing movie to me; too much of it is bogged down in an unnecessary (and worse told) origin retread and an extremely bad rendering of the Lizard, almost as bad as the sequel's version of Electro. The Peter/Gwen stuff at the heart of these movies is imo the only thing that actually works, though that's occasionally problematic too.

I was in denial for a long time about how bad Spider-Man 3 was, lol. And while certain parts of it are fine, it's hard not to watch the ending of SM2 -- specifically the scene of Harry discovering his father's lair -- and not be bummed about how badly SM3 whiffed on all that. I know Raimi was not a fan of Venom, but I actually thought the character was a much more natural fit for the story Raimi wanted to tell with that movie. Certainly more so than a hamfisted retcon to tie in Sandman with Peter. There's so much wasted potential on basically every character's arc, the Peter/MJ story at the heart of the first two movies just doesn't work here (unlike Holland/Zendaya or Garfield/Stone, Maguire and Dunst just have no chemistry at this point anymore) and something about the overall vibe of the movie feels off in a way I can't articulate.
 

Barrel Cannon

It's Pronounced "Aerith"
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
9,321
The list is pretty close to my rankings surprisingly.

Although haven't seen 2 films on that list
 

MisterR

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,463
and that's the main reason why the film is overrated as much as it is. We all saw it as kids/teenagers and too many refuse to realize that it's not the best thing evar that's never gonna be topped.

The second time I saw Spider-Man 2 in theaters I had all these same problems, it has nothing to do with the MCU or whatever fanboy shit you want to make it about.
Your problems are mostly stupid though? Doc Ock is basically a Frankenstein's Monster. He's pushes to far and becomes a tragic villain. Tons of great villains in literature and film are the same. The rest of your stuff is just basic nitpick stuff that you personally didn't like.
 

Spinluck

â–˛ Legend â–˛
Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
28,546
Chicago
A great example of just how badly written Far From Home is, is how it handled the spider-sense thing. Peter not having it and regaining it to fight Mysterio was such a stilted non event compared to the arc Peter went through of losing and regaining his powers in 2.

The MCU stuff just isn't there emotionally.

He's alway sort of had it.
 
Oct 31, 2017
6,748
it's a ranking of movies, not a ranking of copying comics

True, but I think a Doc Ock more like that comics would have improved on the film.

This is just a silly complaint. The success of Ock as a villain is how he relates to Peter's personal failures. He is everything Peter wants to be and everything he uses excuses to not try to be. The early scenes with him perfectly set up what a good and successful man he is and the rest of the movie is Peter trying to get him back to that point after his downfall.

Besides that the arms have their own rudimentary intelligence but it's clearly Ock's own paranoia and arrogance that's being played on to drive the plan forward.

Maybe I just don't love the what they did with Otto/Dr Octopus and Peter/Spider-Man in that movie...

With Otto being talked into self sacrificing "redemption" and Peter losing his his powers because he doesn't want to be "Spider-Man no more" until his girlfriend needs saving AGAIN
 

Cross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,089
My list is quite similar:

1- FFH
2- Spider-Verse
3- Spider-Man 2
4- Homecoming
5- Spider-Man
6- TASM
7- Spider-Man 3
8- TASM 2
 

FantaSoda

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,992
No lies detected on that list. Personally, I would put Spiderman 1 above Homecoming and Far From Home but that probably is just because I love Dafoe so much (and nostalgia). Y'all guys hating on Raimi's Spiderman 2 are way off the mark. My nostalgia-blind six year old is a massive Spiderman fan and that is the one that he has requested the most (Until Spiderverse came out). That movie is still good today, even for new audiences.
 
Oct 28, 2017
27,653
California
A great example of just how badly written Far From Home is, is how it handled the spider-sense thing. Peter not having it and regaining it to fight Mysterio was such a stilted non event compared to the arc Peter went through of losing and regaining his powers in 2.

The MCU stuff just isn't there emotionally.

But Aunt May threw a banana at Peter!

Lmao, how people can say that the MCU Spider-Man movies are better than the Raimi ones is beyond me.
 

rude

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,812
But Aunt May threw a banana at Peter!

Lmao, how people can say that the MCU Spider-Man movies are better than the Raimi ones is beyond me.
TBH at this point I'm really not sure what these movies offer other than a quick afternoon time waster. The action isn't remarkable (Far From Home's illusion/virtual reality scenes are the most memorable action scenes in the ENTIRE cinematic universe so far and there's been like 12 movies), the plots/characters often feel underwritten, the jokes tread pretty much the same self referential or sarcastic territory/have the same delivery across completely different characters....

I just don't see how Spider-Man 2 (and even 1, as corny as it is) aren't revered as classics on this forum. They're about as auteur as superhero movies could be.
 

MisterR

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,463
TBH at this point I'm really not sure what these movies offer other than a quick afternoon time waster. The action isn't remarkable (Far From Home's illusion/virtual reality scenes are the most memorable action scenes in the ENTIRE cinematic universe so far and there's been like 12 movies), the plots/characters often feel underwritten, the jokes tread pretty much the same self referential or sarcastic territory/have the same delivery across completely different characters....

I just don't see how Spider-Man 2 (and even 1, as corny as it is) aren't revered as classics on this forum. They're about as auteur as superhero movies could be.
People apparently like their comic book movies straight off the conveyor belt. MCU movies, for the whole, are bland, soulless trifles. I think people confuse competence with excellence. They are well crafted, but basically just products, not attempts at works of art. I'll take an ambitious misfire with actual risks taken over mass produced blandness.
 

Cort

Member
Nov 4, 2017
4,362
Saying a movie is great 15 years ago but isnt great by today's standards is frustrating to see. Movies aren't video games. If a movie was structurally sound 15 years ago theres nothing that time can do to it.
 

Sgt. Demblant

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,030
France
I'm 32 and saw that movie in theaters as a teenager. It is a rose tinted nostalgic movie for a lot of people because WE all saw it as kids/teens
Okay. But that's just your personal experience with that film.
Extending that to everyone else on here is just pointless.
I'm 32 as well and didn't see it until my 20s.
And I'm pretty sure most of the critics who gave it excellent reviews were way older than you back then.

The nostalgia argument just always makes me sigh. It's lazy and meaningless.
 

Yasuke

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,817
He's alway sort of had it.

It's been inconsistent since his introduction (which is sort of explained by his convo with Tony about him struggling to sort through all of his dialed up senses), and I like that FFH went to lengths to finally establish it and his mastery over it.

I'd go

1. FFH
2. Spider-Verse
3. Homecoming

Doesn't really matter after that. I prefer watching Garfield be Spider-Man to any of the Raimi films, but SM2 is the more competently made movie in general than the Amazing flicks.
 

Ignatz Mouse

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,741
I'm in my fifties, I saw Spider-Man 2:

- In the theater as an adult
- on video
- upon BluRay release
- again when my kids were old enough to enjoy it (maybe 4 years ago?)

It's absolutely a great superhero movie still, one of the very best. Nothing nostalgia-based about my love of it.
 

CloudWolf

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,671
The Business Insider list is the truth. Literally the only one I would switch are SM3 and Venom. At least Venom had Tom Hardy hamming it up big time, SM3 was just... blergh. Still better than both ASM movies though, those were just nothing movies, at least with SM3 I felt something.

EDIT: I'm actually baffled that somebody can put Far From Home at or near the top. Aside from that one (incredible) scene it's completely mediocre. No way it's better than Spider-Man 1 or Homecoming and I don't even like Homecoming that much.
 

Spinluck

â–˛ Legend â–˛
Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
28,546
Chicago
It's been inconsistent since his introduction (which is sort of explained by his convo with Tony about him struggling to sort through all of his dialed up senses), and I like that FFH went to lengths to finally establish it and his mastery over it.

I'd go

1. FFH
2. Spider-Verse
3. Homecoming

Doesn't really matter after that. I prefer watching Garfield be Spider-Man to any of the Raimi films, but SM2 is the more competently made movie in general than the Amazing flicks.

Yeah. I'm glad they went this road of him actually having to discover it. It's always been sort of a plot device so I having him go against a villain that pretty much forces him to use it was great.
 

Deleted member 2145

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
29,223
People apparently like their comic book movies straight off the conveyor belt. MCU movies, for the whole, are bland, soulless trifles. I think people confuse competence with excellence. They are well crafted, but basically just products, not attempts at works of art. I'll take an ambitious misfire with actual risks taken over mass produced blandness.

sounds like you're having a rough go at it today

I hope you deal with this tragedy as best you can, we're all thinking about you
 

NameUser

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,078
You know, I like the new movies, but I kinda feel like being part of the MCU is hurting them. There was a sense of wonder in that Toby McGuire trilogy. Now with the new ones it feels all about Iron Man and what's going on with the world/and other heroes.

I feel like we're going to reach a point where shared universes become less important.