You could try engaging with my argument like I did yours instead of ducking and running and painting what I wrote with a broad brush.
I did, and your point didn't address mine.
I also can't take anyone who types this:
"Crypto has no use case beyond existing as a speculative vehicle for libertarians to cream themselves over and for normies to either get lucky or lose big and as a result it is killing the planet for no real good practical reason."
and is trying to have a serious conversation, this seems more like the regurgitated nonsense all the other posters are spewing.
What about ETFs, are they also speculative vechiles? the stock market itself?
Could it be that most investment instruments (like housing contracts, bonds) are all speculative vehicles? like what are you even trying to accomplish in your point?
Can you react to mine? If, crypto - or fuck, anything else were to replace gold as a currency that had a similar eco-footprint as Crypto,
wouldnt that be net positive for the environment. Which was my sole and only point?