Well, I didn't mean to imply that I agreed with their post. My wording was unclear, sorry. What I'm saying is that game critics are usually unkind to games that play like their decade+ old counterparts. Crackdown and KH both caught heat for it by some game critics but honestly, the updates they made to their respective games were really fun and well done (well, I can vouch for CD, I'll assume KH) and I think people are underselling how fun the systems in older games are. I just hope fans don't get in a tizzy when Gamespot or whoever slaps it with a 6.5.
No, I know. It's okay.
It's just I've read some posts (and I'm glad they're in the minority in this thread), and I just have to wonder if they read the article itself or know the original games intimately enough to make statements like that. I've played these games basically for 20 years, consumed every piece of information about this game voraciously for almost four years, and spent literally hours reading and re-reading the source article to write a spoiler-free summary; so I think I'm reasonably justified to call bullshit when I see downplaying of how different Ys Net are willing to make Shenmue III from predecessors.
Reviews will be what they'll be. Shenmue I & II got generally favourable reviews according to Metacritic, and those are pretty much the same games that came out in 1999 and 2001 respectively. I don't expect universal praise for Shenmue III, but at the same time I don't think the evidence is there to have a great gnawing fear about its reception.
Damn if Ryo face is baaad... his lips are the worst part, looks so mad in a wrong way.
Old asset. Like 2017 old. None of the screens in the magazine are recent either, the latest we can trace the build is from July 2018.
These are the new screens: