Has Jones or anyone else at EZA ever discussed whether they have considered setting up alternative funding sources to Patreon? I mean, they do in the form of Twitch subscriptions and all that, but I'm talking major crowdfunding alternatives here. Obviously EZA will be fine for the foreseeable future, but Patreon's recent major changes have made me feel like it's quite risky to rely on a single third-party company for your funding in the way so many content creators are. I've seen creators on twitter discuss setting up a personal Patreon alternative through plugins on their own website which sounded quite appealing to me, but I'm sure that's harder to manage at EZA's size.
I'm not sure if I would take the risk with such a successful patreon to switch to a different funding source to be honest. You can be sure you will lose some income as not everybody will follow.
I would at least see how much they money the lose first.
Don't forget that 9 people are counting on that funding in EZA's case.
I would consider changing if I would have a patreon campaign which only consists of me and which made $300 per month or something, but in this case I would first see what will happen with this thing change the first few months.
It is still a considerable risk to change to a new funding source.
Edit:
I also don't believe that removing your patronage is using your voice against patreon itself. It is just lowering the income of the creator you love.
That said, I totally understand that this change will make some people having to choose which patreons they keep supporting and which ones to cut or to lower their tier. If you support multiple patreons, this change adds up.
I don't see anything wrong with that. Also, while I don't believe it will help to cut off funding, if people don't feel comfortable with supporting patreon anymore, they should just stop using it and follow their heart.