Not really.
I play a lot of strategy games, and there's so much Rome stuff there I'm honestly kind of tired of it. And it doesn't help that I find the setting in general to be pretty boring. And it didn't help that the last Roman game I played was Imperator, which was both super disappointing as a game, and also showed how the setting didn't really work in the game because the developer diaries just admitted they had to make a ton of stuff up because the historical records for a lot of early European tribal people just don't really exist. But people want more Rome games for some reason, so Paradox chose to do that instead of focusing on rarer (and more interesting) historical settings.
But even outside of strategy games, at least the Roman empire has games about it. But you can't really say the same for pretty much any other
large empire in history. Seriously, how many games are there that are set in the Brazilian empire, the Russian Empire, the Ottoman empire, any one of the huge Arab caliphates (excluding the crusades), or anything in India. Outside of some Paradox games for some of these empires, I don't think there even are any. And these are all settings I'd be much more interested in exploring instead of just getting another thing set in Rome.
Also, my dislike for Rome probably also comes from just how much non-video game stuff is focused on it. It has tons of movies and books about it, and like 30% of my history school education feels like it was about Rome. Sure, Rome was pretty influential on European culture and history, but so was a whole bunch of other stuff that never actually gets any attention in popular media.