CORRECT
Low really is a fantastic album. Such a great mood to it, it puts pictures in my head; which is always a good sign.
Shoutout to the wonderfully weird 'The Man who fell to Earth'. It's a good watch.
And don't forget FWWM!
CORRECT
People can't let go of the first time they smoked weed and listened to Space Oddity.EDIT: Wait, he had sex with underage girls? Well shit. I hadn't heard about that. I don't know how I missed it, considering how much of a fan of his my wife is. That's not cool, I don't care who you are. It doesn't matter if she's making excuses about it and rationalizing it. She was fifteen. A kid, and he was an adult. He knew better. That's the point. It doesn't matter how much she was in love with David Bowie the rock star, she was a kid.
Talented musician, and incredibly influential, but I'm not going to turn a blind eye to this revelation. Trying to rationalize away a culture built around exploiting your underage fanbase is gross.
You just described the music industry and marketing.a culture built around exploiting your underage fanbase is gross.
Are we here to celebrate an artist or this is a camouflaged thread to bash him?
I loved the last two albums from Bowie, it was a weird but awesome phase. Stll got various songs from The Next Day and Blackstar on my phone.
I know right. He may have had sex with a ton of underage girls, but Under Pressure is an undeniable classic.Apparently both? I'm more than comfortable with the fact that I am still able to appreciate Bowie's work despite the holier-than-thou judgements of internet randoms who only join a conversation in order to tell everyone how wrong they are and proceed to immediately dismiss whatever significance and positive impact his work could have had on their lives with "lol drugs and rock and roll"
I guess we can't be heroes, just for one day
I know right. He may have had sex with a ton of underage girls, but Under Pressure is an undeniable classic.
Nah, not necessary. Your stance on this is immovable. However, by bringing it up, hopefully those that weren't aware will rethink their undying admiration for the man. Keep on rockin' though.aw man you really showed me this time. Make the same post again one more time but with a different song title to really drive it home!
Nah, not necessary. Your stance on this is immovable. However, by bringing it up, hopefully those that weren't aware will rethink their undying admiration for the man. Keep on rockin' though.
The concept of the age of consent is based on society's view that underage people cannot "approve."I'm not trying to romanticize anything and I'm sorry if it seemed that way. To clarify, I disagree with the groupie lifestyle in every aspect and it's a blight on the 70's music culture. What I am saying though is that the language used ('rape') personally doesn't feel very fitting for the groupie situation because rape IMO implies that one of the two actors didn't approve of what was happening.
Fighting the good fight, one ERA member at a time.Nah, not necessary. Your stance on this is immovable. However, by bringing it up, hopefully those that weren't aware will rethink their undying admiration for the man. Keep on rockin' though.
There's a difference between the Hollywood assault (which is 99 out of 100 times unwanted) and the stuff that went on in the 70's music scene, with girls literally fighting each other over a chance to have sex with <insert popular musician>. Could the likes of Mercury, Bowie and Page have said "You know what, you're way too young for this." Absolutely, and they probably should've done so, but there's a very clear difference in consent and intent here. These girls aren't emotionally traumatized by what was going on, they were having the time of their life. Read the article posted above, that girl is damn proud to have had David Bowie deflower her at 15 years old. Another groupie of whom I forgot the name has written an entire book about how when she was 16 she used to try (and succeed) to have sex with pretty much every major American music star.
My point is that everything we consume is tainted in some way. The whole industry is shit and we still actively take part in itYes I did. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, though.
The entertainment industry and many industries as a whole have a problem with abuse of power and power dynamics.
There's no excusing sexual abuse, but describing what was happening in 70's culture isn't the same as excusing rape. Let's all keep a cool head and remain civil about this sensitive topic. Thanks.
Pretty much, I'm sure there are plenty of musicians and people in general alive in the 70's who didn't have sex with underage kids."They were all doing it" seems like excusing it to me. I doubt I'm alone in thinking this.
"They were all doing it" seems like excusing it to me. I doubt I'm alone in thinking this.
That's about where I'm at. Someone can be an international musical icon who inspired entire generations that followed him and still have done messed up shit back in the 70s. The two aren't mutually exclusive and don't cancel each other out. Don't act like one didn't happen just because you want to emphasize the other...
Yes, he and just about every other rock start back in the day had sex with under aged groupies.
Yes, his music, acting, and general celebrity has been a guiding force for people ever since his first moments in the spotlight.
Celebrate the man. Condemn the mistakes. But don't go telling other people they're opinion of him, which ever it may be, is wrong. And don't go trying to force your opinion of him on them.
Back on topic, Bowie was the whole reason I got into music to begin with and I definitely would not be who I am if it weren't for his albums, his character in Labrynth, and his general fantastically weird persona in every interview/documentary I've ever seen him in. I can't emphasize enough how much of an impact his work had on my early life, and I'm glad he left behind such an extensive library that I can still go back through and enjoy. He will be missed...
Yes, he and just about every other rock start back in the day had sex with under aged groupies.
Were you're parents in the music industry? Rock, specifically? Because if so, then there actually is a very good chance they did and just never told you about it... And no, the fact that "everyone was doing it," as you put it, does not make it ok. But at least hold the rest of them to the same standard. Good luck dragging Bowie into a courtroom in 2018; as you said. But there are plenty of living rock stars from the 70s that you could do that with. By all means, apply this same thought process to them; since they're still around and can still be brought to justice for it.Source on this? Even if it was true it doesn't make it okay. This "back in the 70's" shit doesn't fly, pretty sure my parents never raped anyone because "it was the 70's". Pretty sure most people never raped anyone because "well that's just the way things were int he 70's". And even if it was you drag their rapist ass in a courtroom in 2018 or into the court of public opinion because it's never okay no matter what decade and the 70's were not some magical time where it was.
You can have the opinion you enjoy his music but to celebrate the man is just ridiculous to me.
I mean, he's dead. That Bowie had sex with kids is gross, regardless of whether or not it was sort of the norm for the industry then, but there's no way of holding him accountable for it anymore either.Yeah no. Just write you don't care that David Bowie has sex with kids.
Had no idea about that; sounds awesome! Definitely going to be checking at out in March then, thanks!If anyone's in New York, be sure to go to the Brooklyn Museum from March to June, because the art exhibition David Bowie Is will be there. It's the best museum exhibition I've ever seen due to the clever use of situational audio. It's hard to believe that it's been 3 years since I saw it at MCA Chicago