This.I don't know who to ask, so I'm asking out in the open. Hopefully that's not against the rules:
Can the mods just make a separate thread for the "language" discussion? If people wanna have that debate, cool. I can't stop them. But at least take it somewhere else so the rest of us can talk about the actual game. Thank you.
Again, if me asking openly like this is against the rules, my apologies.
This is almost surely a direct result of the trans joke on Twitter. I think if this had been released without that tweet, people would have been more inclined to ignore it.Era is descending into the worst type of ultra-politically correct, don't dare offend anyone, ever culture. This isn't meaningful discourse and it's getting completely out of control.
If people are unable to grasp the specific context of language and themes in a futureal dystopic video game and feel the need to overanalyse and disproportionately relate everything back to modern society and gender-identity issues (which are of course very real and scary), every one is going to have a bad time.
It's a fucking video game, and a brilliant looking one at that. Move on.
I get the feeling the press saw something different to this. It's the only explanation I can come up with. Maybe that's why the video took so long to be shown publicly? They were re-recording the demo with console visuals and the press saw something closer to high end PC?
It at least gives us a more realistic idea of how it will look. Instead of having another Witcher 3/watchdogs situation.
At this point it's clear that the argument over the language has overshadowed the discussion of the Gameplay demo. So i think (and other) it would be best to split the subjects. That way the can both be focused on separately.You all could have used these posts to talk about the game you know. It's not like anyone is stopping you.
Because gamers™ cannot handle discussions about social issues.Why is it that this pedantry is fine, while discussion about the actual dialogue in the game needs to be segmented off?
What a weird thing to say. That's like saying another country uses bitch or fuck in a non cursing way so everyone who does acknowledge it as a curse in their culture should grow up and not be offended. Cultures are different just because something is not offensive to you doesn't mean that other people should just get over it.
And that doesn't even change the fact that cunt can be used in a negative way in your country.
You can still say something along the lines of "son of a bitch", "fucker" or something else that doesn't have that connotation, really. It has the same effect and removes that connotation.
Because gamers™ cannot handle discussions about social issues.
I literally just want to relax and have fun and maybe, y'know, escape from every day problems in a VIDEO GAME.
Well, I think the fact that I had to specify I was talking about the game when asking someone what their argument was should answer that question. People were arguing over the actual meaning of the word "pussy". Doesn't really have anything to do with the game at that point, imo.I know people are tired about the language discussion, and by all means I don't think it's a huge issue in the grand scheme of things, but I don't really get why conversation about the dialogue in a story heavy game is a separate issue when most of the thread will actually be people arguing pedantry over the lighting, or the tech specs, or the way the gunplay feels. Why is it that this pedantry is fine, while discussion about the actual dialogue in the game needs to be segmented off?
Wasn't really digging the VO actress for V. Also, the writing wasn't really what I expected. It's not egregiously bad, but I expected more after the Witcher 3.this sold me on the perspective decision within the first few minutes. there's a certain claustrophobic feeling about those interiors that you can't get in 3rd person.
in terms of writing, this wasn't quite the tone I was expecting from the Witcher 3 team's next game but it won me over by the end.
Yea most people are gonna ignore people who just want to argue than discuss. Nothing to do with gender. This childish behaviour "I've won HAHAHA", yea thats gonna cause you to end up on ignore lists.HAH. You're SO good at listening to women. You definitely proved that.
Dont buy the game then. Not all games are made for you. I dont play CoD, counterstrike, etc cause i find such glorification of fake-realistic gun violence in a real world setting gross. It doesn't make me relax, cause it just makes me think of all the awful stuff happening in the world right now.Yeah except it's a fucking VIDEO GAME. I do not want nor expect a 1:1 representation of reality in my video games, especially when I literally just want to relax and have fun and maybe, y'know, escape from every day problems in a VIDEO GAME.
Apparently I am not allowed to have this escape because realism or some shit. Ok. Whatever, man.
Because people don't want to listen about controversial topics such as the offensive language used in their favorite hobby.I know people are tired about the language discussion, and by all means I don't think it's a huge issue in the grand scheme of things, but I don't really get why conversation about the dialogue in a story heavy game is a separate issue when most of the thread will actually be people arguing pedantry over lighting vs some other video game. Why is it that this pedantry is fine, while discussion about the actual dialogue in the game needs to be segmented off?
I know people are tired about the language discussion, and by all means I don't think it's a huge issue in the grand scheme of things, but I don't really get why conversation about the dialogue in a story heavy game is a separate issue when most of the thread will actually be people arguing pedantry over the lighting, or the tech specs, or the way the gunplay feels. Why is it that this pedantry is fine, while discussion about the actual dialogue in the game needs to be segmented off?
It's because it's a bigger issue and requires its own separate field to discuss. The demo thread is to encompass all aspects of the demo and the peoples' reactions to it. Segmenting bigger issues allows for more thorough more open and more focused discussions about them rather than filling up a thread where the discussion is all over the place with various aspects of the game.Because gamers™ cannot handle discussions about social issues.
Not to derail this convo further but...son of a bitch? How is that not sexist?You can still say something along the lines of "son of a bitch", "fucker" or something else that doesn't have that connotation, really. It has the same effect and removes that connotation.
The more interesting thing about that detail is that the card that contained the credits and the virus, you can keep it. What does that mean? Can you use it to try and buy a new eye and hand? What happens when that store keeper tries to process the transaction? Same with arms dealers?Okay back to the topic, I think if we got conformation that we could purchase that spider without having to go through the fight I think we will probably be at an acceptable level in terms of gameplay choices.
I completely agree. But that's not why i agree with the sentiment that it should have it's own thread.Because gamers™ cannot handle discussions about social issues.
Sure he has. And on point with what is happening with cyberpunk here. His movies are amazing because he portrays aggressive behavior incredibly. Same here. Some will not tolerate it, which is fine.You say this as if Tarantino hasn't come under fire for some of the exploitative imagery and language in his films.
HAH. You're SO good at listening to women. You definitely proved that.
Yeah except it's a fucking VIDEO GAME. I do not want nor expect a 1:1 representation of reality in my video games, especially when I literally just want to relax and have fun and maybe, y'know, escape from every day problems in a VIDEO GAME.
Apparently I am not allowed to have this escape because realism or some shit. Ok. Whatever, man.
"Ok I have a problem with the dialogue in this game, specifically how try hard it is with it's insults, which also are gendered and derogatory against women in a way that normalizes that kind of thing while also not actually saying anything about the subject. Cool demo though"What social issues are arriving from a scene where two attackers are trying to kill a mob boss?
If we're discussing the gendered connotations of cunt, you can't just then casually imply bitch would be in any way a better alternative.You can still say something along the lines of "son of a bitch", "fucker" or something else that doesn't have that connotation, really. It has the same effect and removes that connotation.
It's because it's a bigger issue and requires its own separate field to discuss. The demo thread is to encompass all aspects of the demo and the peoples' reactions to it. Segmenting bigger issues allows for more thorough more open and more focused discussions about them rather than filling up a thread where the discussion is all over the place with various aspects of the game.
Yeah, I did not like Jackie because of the stereotypical Hollywood spanglish. I'm Hispanic and don't know any Hispanics/Mexicans that speak like that. And then there's the "accent". It doesn't sound like it's a Hispanic VA to me.
Which again. I agree with.If anything, the fact that people are so bothered by the discussion happening in the first place is why such discussions need to be happening.
Are you one of those people who think everything is just "too PC" these days?
You have really misinformed views on sexism.
Everyone should just ignore everything they don't like, then the world would be an awesome place. Ignoring things is the best way to make social progress.
No, that isn't how things work. I mean, don't play the game, sure, but if they want to put a product out there especially after other questionable things like the Twitter debacle and non-apology they can take the heat for their decisions
it's a drastic shift from Geralt's stoic delivery for sureWasn't really digging the VO actress for V. Also, the writing wasn't really what I expected. It's not egregiously bad, but I expected more after the Witcher 3.
This sure says a lot about the medium and how it handles "mature" subject matter.It's a MATURE game, games for years and years and years and years have used this sort of language we aren't all 12.
The quality of dialogue here doesn't even remotely touch Tarantino's work dude, pls stop lmfao.Sure he has. And on point with what is happening with cyberpunk here. His movies are amazing because he portrays aggressive behavior incredibly. Same here. Some will not tolerate it, which is fine.