Haha so you mean it was even creepier?When I made that gif I made tiny edits to the length and speed to reduce the amount of uncanny valley lol
Still, nice work. It looks really well made.
Haha so you mean it was even creepier?When I made that gif I made tiny edits to the length and speed to reduce the amount of uncanny valley lol
Work now?I tiny clear square? 😋
Sadly the image appears broken for me. :(
"Everything is political" comes from a very academic place but it is legitimate. Anyone who has done any cultural studies or an Art degree would be able to take you through it line and verse because it's drilled into them but basically it comes from the same place as everything Man made is cultural/culture (read political) and everything not is natural/nature.Look I'm a big fan of cyberpunk (especially when it has something to say) and while the "traditional" setup can't be apolitical it's perfectly possible for cyberpunk to have nothing to say. It can be as shallow as any other genre, it doesn't have to address transhumanism or corporations or wealth inequality. It's immensely limiting, for whats already a niche genre, for people to trot out "It's cyberpunk lol" as if anything in the genre has a responsibility to say something or that it should all be rehashed Blade Runner. Cyberpunk fiction can absolutely be apolitical, I mean the world setup this game is shilling cant be so in that context its nonsense but the genre is not inherently political. I mean based on the ludicrously narrow definitions people are throwing around you'd have to fuck out half of Bruce Sterling's seminal Mirrorshades anthology.
As an aside political is starting to feel like a nonsense term. I don't think we quite need to start busting out dictionary definitions like a previous poster but the term has become so nebulous that it wouldnt be surprising that confusion over it springs up e.g. if a piece of art has strong themes and commentary about society is that a social stance or a political one? Is it both? I think most people would have their own answer to that question and all would likely be correct. In short if it was anyone else given the language barrier some benefit of the doubt might be in order. But to be clear I think CDPR, given their appalling track record, deserve absolutely no such concession and I personally have zero doubt what market they are trying to attract with comments like this.
interesting use of this image...so we can't talk about the game at all until its released then?
Nope. Maybe it's a problem with my device. Thanks anyway. :)
No it's not my animation I just made the gif.Haha so you mean it was even creepier?
Still, nice work. It looks really well made.
Ah I see.No it's not my animation I just made the gif.
Give me the Ellie rig ND i'll create memes
He has praised 77 as near perfect adaptation of his work, stuff he has dreamed about for long time.
If only, there is so much potential.No it's not my animation I just made the gif.
Give me the Ellie rig ND i'll create memes
Let's remember some "non political" games
EA "not making any political statements" about WW2 in Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 will change the name of a new, premium German WW2 avatar, but says it isn't making any political statements with the game.www.eurogamer.net
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 ‘is not making any political statements’
A game about the next Civil War refuses to take a sidewww.polygon.com
The Outer Worlds Is Not A "Politically Charged" Game, Co-Director Says
It's supposed to be fun and humorous, Leonard Boyarsky says; get all the details here.www.gamespot.com
Infinity Ward says Modern Warfare isn't political
Developers want to examine topics like colonialism, proxy wars, and power imbalance in a totally non-political way.www.pcgamer.com
yes? Ok, fuck him too. He used to be cool and punk. But he doesn't making a stand for this kind of bullshit that is opposite to HIS lore is wack.
Hopefully TLOU2 being huge can be influential with thisI think this aversion to wanting to be seen to be saying anything is extremely damaging to the mediums credibility.
Imagine a world where music, film and books were this eager to disassociate themselves from any sort of messaging.
But other developers and Mike have said that cyberpunk is inherently political genre and that 77 isn't shying away from such topics... so umh..?
Even full answer from this interview goes into "we have political stuff" territory as it talks about how they approach designing content. It just sits on the fucking fence and doesn't commit either way which is weak shit, but there is other material out there that makes it sound like 77 will be political.
I hope that the political stuff that he introduced in his games is there in 2077. But come one, you have to admit that this game have some issues about representation.
They mean "political" in the way that GGer's say tlou2 has "political agendas"Is he speaking in general or in relation to the George Floyd case? I've seen other CDPR staff say the opposite in interviews.
If it's specifically about altering content post-George Floyd's death, then that's not really surprising. The game has already been in development for years.
Or maybe, just maybe they have a really bad track record that this is just the latest example of, and in "context" (since all these posts love that word) it adds up to a company that keeps doing bigoted shit, keeps courting bigots-including this statement because that's all it is, a "see gamers were not being political like TLOU2" (where being political meant having non cis/straight people in it, but that's a whole 'nother conversation)-repeatedly to the point it will be a good thing if it's "non-political" because based on the transphobia both from in game stuff that has been seen and their social media I sure as hell don't trust them in deeper themes that are important to me.I'd say we find out how the game is structured and what the message is before grabbing the pitchforks and torches?
But I get that is not as exciting as jumping to conclusions and spewing hate based on a Google translate article from a questionable source begging for clicks.
Is he speaking in general or in relation to the George Floyd case? I've seen other CDPR staff say the opposite in interviews.
If it's specifically about altering content post-George Floyd's death, then that's not really surprising. The game has already been in development for years.
If that's the case, I'm not really sure what he was expected to say. Of course they aren't going to alter the game at this point.Question was directly about Floyd's death and current BLM movement spawned from it, https://www.resetera.com/threads/cd...litical-statement.255558/page-2#post-40759326
Saying cyberpunk can be apolitical is as silly as saying punk can be apolitical. The whole genre of punk music is based on fighting the system. Much in the same way cyberpunk is sci-fi with a clear intent of exploring the woes of (future) societies in some worst case scenarios. If it has none of that, then it's not cyberpunk it's something else.Look I'm a big fan of cyberpunk (especially when it has something to say) and while the "traditional" setup can't be apolitical it's perfectly possible for cyberpunk to have nothing to say. It can be as shallow as any other genre, it doesn't have to address transhumanism or corporations or wealth inequality. It's immensely limiting, for whats already a niche genre, for people to trot out "It's cyberpunk lol" as if anything in the genre has a responsibility to say something or that it should all be rehashed Blade Runner. Cyberpunk fiction can absolutely be apolitical, I mean the world setup this game is shilling cant be so in that context its nonsense but the genre is not inherently political. I mean based on the ludicrously narrow definitions people are throwing around you'd have to fuck out half of Bruce Sterling's seminal Mirrorshades anthology.
As an aside political is starting to feel like a nonsense term. I don't think we quite need to start busting out dictionary definitions like a previous poster but the term has become so nebulous that it wouldnt be surprising that confusion over it springs up e.g. if a piece of art has strong themes and commentary about society is that a social stance or a political one? Is it both? I think most people would have their own answer to that question and all would likely be correct. In short if it was anyone else given the language barrier some benefit of the doubt might be in order. But to be clear I think CDPR, given their appalling track record, deserve absolutely no such concession and I personally have zero doubt what market they are trying to attract with comments like this.
If that's the case, I'm not really sure what he was expected to say. Of course they aren't going to alter the game at this point.
I don't think that means the game is going to be entirely devoid of political and social commentary.
I don't think anyone thinks this game doesn't have politics in it. But if their attitude is to not push political messaging, people are just justifiably sceptical they will have done any kind of decent job at creating a noteworthy cyberpunk gameEven the clip-chimped paragraph OP trotted out for this dumpster-fire of a thread starts with the sentence: "Anyway, I think you saw elements in the game that touch it, so you could find out for yourself." Like, literally and explicitly stating that the game story includes commentary on racial politics.
Twisting someone stating that their game is not a targeted political screed into "LOL THIS GAME NO POLITIX" is the height of disingenuous fuckery.
It's basically what happened to the legacy of Bob Marley and the Reggae genre. Sad to see.Unfornately it seems like they basically just took the surface of level of something like your avatar and decided that is what cyberpunk is. "Badass dudes and hot chicks with robot parts and guns! And neon lights!"
Bigots think that adding a gay or trans character in a story makes it political.what is a political statement? I have not played last of us 2 but i have seen this word in that thread many times.
Yeah, they have some amazing messaging issues and keep shoving that foot into their mouths. Edit: They should just reset their social media team as issues there go beyond just CMs doing tweeting.
When it comes to representation in the game itself I do think they should decouple gendered pronoun from voice choice. That they aren't separated is pretty mind blowing as it's such obvious thing to do, especially if your goal with CC is trying to be inclusive. Using non-gendered pronouns gets trickier as they don't exist at all in some languages they localized into, but having option for languages that have them would been nice.
Talking about e.g. trans issues themselves I want to see how they actually handle such topics in the game. Those few ads that have come out do leave bad taste when observed on their own, but I want to also see if there is something actually there when it comes to talking about it.
When it comes to other topics as capitalism, socialism, religions, government powers, censorship etc. we have basically nothing to even speculate on at this point.
Having lgbt characters is a poltical agenda accoring to bigoted fucks.what is a political statement? I have not played last of us 2 but i have seen this word in that thread many times.
honestly this is the most I've eve
I was willing to give them slack with the "they are very polish" when doing press around the the Witcher 3. But now? Fuck that Witcher 3 was a huge success. They have offices all around the world and they want to play in the Big Leagues of AAA. They need to start acting like it.Bad statement but what do you expect I suppose. I bet the game is actually political as hell, & I it'll probably be really good. They just don't want to alienate any chuds. Worth noting that CDPR is very Polish... it's not exactly surprising at all that they are very middle of the road at best with their statements and outright offensive at worst.
Doesn't he dislike the Bladerunner movies too?