He is but he looks too different from the comics Kang, imo.What's wrong with Jonathan Majors? He's awesome in everything I've seen him in so far.
He is but he looks too different from the comics Kang, imo.What's wrong with Jonathan Majors? He's awesome in everything I've seen him in so far.
I think the shows are entirely skippable. When Kang is introduced in the film universe for example, it will be as if it was for the first time for sure. Way more people watch the movies than the shows.
Especially shit like Ms Marvel which had very lower viewership numbers. You almost have to reboot her in film form if she is to become a notable part of the movies because the vast majority will be like...what?
Shows will just be some extra shades for the super fans that watched them. Passive references. Even the new captain America film, it helps to know the personal struggle for the new cap that it showed in the tv show but ultimately you don't have to.
Hopefully that's the case going forward and they don't double down on intertwining the shows and the movies too much like WandaVision -> Multiverse of Madness, because I honestly feel that the shows are not up to par so far (mind you, I only watched up till Moon Knight). I don't want to be forced to watch every single show to understand the upcoming MCU movies tbh.
In Loki yeah, but the Ant-Man poster shows he'll be much more comic accurate in that.
In Loki yeah, but the Ant-Man poster shows he'll be much more comic accurate in that.
Uhhhhh…Would've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :
That face does not scream peaceful or wise to me.....Uh not at all, very different faces. The worst thing about Majors Kang is that his expression is constantly ¨peaceful/wise¨ in every showing, he doesnt look like a threat at all.
Would've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :
Um that wasn't recent. Kang has been know to be Nathaniel Richards for a very, very, very long time in the comics.There is. A recent issue of Fantastic Four exploited Reed and Kang having similar DNA.
Would've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :
....Uh not at all, very different faces. The worst thing about Majors Kang is that his expression is constantly ¨peaceful/wise¨ in every showing, he doesnt look like a threat at all.
Would've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :
It doesn't matter, I don't think most of the actors have the same sort of face shapes as their comic counterpartWould've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :
It doesn't matter, I don't think most of the actors have the same sort of face shapes as their comic counterpart
Am I not allowed to have preferences like everyone else?I'm holding back my judgment until we get a better look at his knees.
You are allowed. It's just a real weird preference and people are gonna comment on it
Is it really a weird preference to want an actor to look more similar to the character they're interpreting?You are allowed. It's just a real weird preference and people are gonna comment on it
lol you can have any preference you want, but that doesn't mean people can't criticize your opinion, especially when it's such an incredibly minor nitpick
It's weird to fixate on his nose not being sharp enough, yeahIs it really a weird preference to want an actor to look more similar to the character they're interpreting?
It really isn't.
Iwata is not who said please be excited.This is going to be a really tiresome post to see over amd over the next few days. Phase 4 literally *isn't* building up into anything and just ends. If anything, this panel was Marvel pulling an Iwata and going "please be excited"
I don't get it, Robert Downey Junior didn't look that much like the old Tony Stark comics facial wise. I bet Kang in the comics ends up looking more like Jonathan Majors.
Kang is often quite stoic he's not always a raging madman. Majors can do it all.
Depends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.I don't get it, Robert Downey Junior didn't look that much like the old Tony Stark comics facial wise. I bet Kang in the comics ends up looking more like Jonathan Majors.
Chill.This has nothing to do with him being black.They could've picked a different black actor and I wouldn't have cared.I know we're not criticizing Jonathan Major's very phenotypically Black nose.
I know that's not what's happening.
I know the fuck not.
Chill.This has nothing to do with him being black.They could've picked another black actor and I wouldn't have cared.
He has dark hair and he's white but not really.Depends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.
Looked enough like 2000s that it was fine, 2010s took a very odd turn thoughDepends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.
As I said before, this has nothing to do with him being black so chill.And I don't care about that.
You have based your total criticism of Jonathan Major's ability to play this part on his very Black nose. You made that choice.
Depends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.
💀💀💀Depends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.
If your complaint is about his nose then yes. Especially since smaller details like that always changes depending on the artist in the comic.Is it really a weird preference to want an actor to look more similar to the character they're interpreting?
Dude has like four different noses across six pictures and even more different jawlinesDepends which Tony Stark you're talking about and I think Robert looks similar to most of them.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.Now if any of you want to keep discussing about this, feel free to PM me instead of derailing the whole thread.
Would've preferred someone with a sharper nose, so he'd look something like this :