That's how I always viewed it. Just being honest.i think you're being intentionally obtuse. you know it's not one game just split into three.
It might help to note that I didn't grow up with ff7, so I don't have that nostalgia
That's how I always viewed it. Just being honest.i think you're being intentionally obtuse. you know it's not one game just split into three.
I guess I didn't see it like that, it's a remake of a game thats not a trilogy
Nice. 😮
That's a bit of bummer.To 7R, no. The mechanics are unique to the game. The closest thing to 7R's gameplay is probably Star Ocean.
Assuming ff7 is broken into 3 parts, and that's not counting all the special editions, and what's likely a complete edition after all parts are out.
Why? Just cause it's ff7? It also doesn't help that marketing is misleading, and I wouldn't blame you if you thought you got the full game in April.
Catch me on that "buying on Steam sale six months after PC launch" shit.you can just wait until the games are discounted if you don't want to pay the premium. hell if you wait long enough you can probably get all 3 games for 60 or less.
Tbf there are aspects of Ff7 that could easily point to a trilogy/more games in a whole story . Having just played that game for the first time, that game speeds through a lot of story beats that could (and should) be given more time to breathe which I think the remake could very well enhance with this method. So many towns that you spend 20 minutes in to never care about afterwards.I guess I didn't see it like that, it's a remake of a game thats not a trilogy
Mass Effect was absolutely sold as the beginning of a franchise. The only difference with FF7R is that it's drawing from existing source material. It's not even a remake in the traditional sense, it's an adaptation within the same medium.I feel like the stories of games such as Mass Effect and FFXIII were always meant to be told in multiple parts, but they never tell consumers that. Otherwise, we'd get threads like this asking why it wasn't all one game to begin with. That's not even taking into consideration development costs to tell the story they want to tell in the way they want to tell it.
That's how I always viewed it. Just being honest.
It might help to note that I didn't grow up with ff7, so I don't have that nostalgia
I mean yeah, but looking at how long it has taken them, I'd imagine they're large games and have a lot of effort poured into them... I really don't care at this point lmaoWouldn't you rather one full game? Why the special treatment here? I only see greedy money signs
And funny enough, I'm sure there will be a complete edition to further cash in after all parts are out
Here's a hot take, I don't think they're going to finish the game, and if they do, it won't be like the original at all in terms of scale.
Here's a hot take, I don't think they're going to finish the game, and if they do, it won't be like the original at all in terms of scale.
Was it? Awesome. I only played part 2. :)Mass Effect was absolutely sold as the beginning of a franchise. The only difference with FF7R is that it's drawing from existing source material. It's not even a remake in the traditional sense, it's an adaptation within the same medium.
It's probably going to be wildly successful. What reason would they have to not finish it? It's probably priority number 1 at Square. They have every incentive to finish it.
and people will want that last part a lot, it has some of the most wanted moments for fans i imagineIt's probably going to be wildly successful. What reason would they have to not finish it? It's probably priority number 1 at Square. They have every incentive to finish it.
Here's a hot take, I don't think they're going to finish the game, and if they do, it won't be like the original at all in terms of scale.
It's going to be be finished, and it's going to be so successful we'll get more additions to the ff7 compilation.
This.If each part is of a significant length (15 - 20+ hours?), sure.
It's not though. Why are you making such a terrible argument? Is it on purpose? Even after people have corrected you and explained the reason.It's one game tho, broken down to 3 cause.... Why pay once right, so old school, let's cash in on fans 3 times over lol
This isn't an interesting topic because there's like 5 of these every time any new info about the game is released. Everyone has their opinions set either way already and pretty much every discussion point is widely known now.
It's fine for you to not like it, but it's extremely disingenuous to frame it as paying 3x for the same game.
That's an older message at this point. Yes, I can see where people are coming from nowIt's not though. Why are you making such a terrible argument? Is it on purpose? Even after people have corrected you and explained the reason.
Yeah it's a reimagining, I just wish they'd call it that than remake. It's like calling GOW PS4 "GOW Remake" you go in expecting God of War 1 remade, not split up, made into a new series that consist of one game's story, and a whole reboot. You at least expect to at least face Ares at the end of the first game, not have a multi game chase to fight him like the old game.Feels more like a reimagining to me, but I'm sure this wouldn't be the first time a developer set out from the get go to produce a trilogy of games to tell the overall story.
We'll just have to wait until the first part comes out to tell wether this is just a way to milk us, or it feels like a complete game of a series.
Again. I can kinda see that reasoning now. But to me, this seemed like 1 game, broken down to 3. They aren't calling it a trilogy. Just episodic. Episodic games are not $60 each. And, the source material is 1 game, not 3.
Again. I can kinda see that reasoning now. But to me, this seemed like 1 game, broken down to 3. They aren't calling it a trilogy. Just episodic. Episodic games are not $60 each. And, the source material is 1 game, not 3.