guessing China. Either way yeah thats huge.Smuggling and violating US embargoes??? This seems like a potentially bigger deal than "just" the harassment issues. What country could this be referring to?
guessing China. Either way yeah thats huge.Smuggling and violating US embargoes??? This seems like a potentially bigger deal than "just" the harassment issues. What country could this be referring to?
I certainly agree with this. I don't know how anyone could look at Facebook alone and think that big tech are a bunch of benevolent technocrats. At absolute best, they're fine with releasing their creations onto the world and being completely apathetic toward the resultant destruction and suffering.My point about capitalism is less a specific critique on the system, but how it feels like in the US we go in cycles of where specific industries get an outsized focus because of their success and as a result you get pretty much the newer version of those assholes getting attracted to it because of the opportunities and lack of regulation because no one wants to fuck with the golden goose.
Reason I bring it up is because tech still pushes this image that they are solely an altruistic force and that money is magically somehow secondary yet we fall into the same trappings as big US industries of old where internally it's a fucked up boys club.
The behavior here is no different then the abhorrent behavior skewered in various media properties about 80's bankers, but because it's not a guy in a 2k suit with coke residue on his mustache but instead a guy in Old Navy jeans they successfully sell themselves as a fair, equitable and ethical place to work.
That later is imho why it makes it more difficult to stamp out than the former. You see it in a bunch of the Activision/Blizzard stuff; where people are like 'It was fucked up, but I thought we were doing good things, and I didn't want to rock the boat'. It gives them cover. At least in the past people wore their shitty behavior on their sleeves here we have an industry that's continually about presenting a pristine image. Like it's not crazy this happened at Apple, the most vain about this image out of all tech
The percentage of the workforce that's full of creepers isn't as relevant as the positions these creepers hold within the corporate power structure. The company's best interests are essentially its stock price which continues to rise and rewards these higher ups disproportionately compared to their inferiors. The only harm comes from having bad PR like this thread which will blow over eventually, so from Apple's perspective things seem to be going fine.My point was that it doesn't really seem to be in a "company's best interests" to have the company be a playground for abusive sociopaths unless they're such a high percentage of the workforce that they're indispensable, which is what I was asking in my original post regarding Silicon Valley.
Yep, people will be upset and still preorder the new iPhone in a few months. It will take massive reporting and backlash for them to address abuse in their ranks it seems.The only harm comes from having bad PR like this thread which will blow over eventually, so from Apple's perspective things seem to be going fine.
Yeah, basically at the end of the day as long as earnings stay up there isn't much of an incentive for a company to care about this type of situation beyond bad PR. Like seemingly 99% of corporate inclusivity, it only matters to the organization as long as its (a) good PR [and helps profits], (b) does not directly or indirectly harm profits, and (c) does not require deviating much from the status quo.The percentage of the workforce that's full of creepers isn't as relevant as the positions these creepers hold within the corporate power structure. The company's best interests are essentially its stock price which continues to rise and rewards these higher ups disproportionately compared to their inferiors. The only harm comes from having bad PR like this thread which will blow over eventually, so from Apple's perspective things seem to be going fine.
Well, the harm would be having a completely dysfunctional corporate culture that destroys/drives off talent in an industry with a talent shortage.The percentage of the workforce that's full of creepers isn't as relevant as the positions these creepers hold within the corporate power structure. The company's best interests are essentially its stock price which continues to rise and rewards these higher ups disproportionately compared to their inferiors. The only harm comes from having bad PR like this thread which will blow over eventually, so from Apple's perspective things seem to be going fine.
always the cringiest people in the office, hate all of this.
I certainly agree with this. I don't know how anyone could look at Facebook alone and think that big tech are a bunch of benevolent technocrats. At absolute best, they're fine with releasing their creations onto the world and being completely apathetic toward the resultant destruction and suffering.
Just some casual EAR violations as a side hustle, no biggie.
Smuggling and violating US embargoes??? This seems like a potentially bigger deal than "just" the harassment issues. What country could this be referring to?
This might be why she's actually on leave. That's…yeah. The harassment is obviously fucking terrible but this….the legal implications of this are bad
Smuggling and violating US embargoes??? This seems like a potentially bigger deal than "just" the harassment issues. What country could this be referring to?
The short version is yes things are that bad because a company can fire you long before any legal consequences happen. For example, here's the timeline for the National Labor Relations Board's complaints against Google:Are the labor laws in the US that bad? Does the Department of Labor do anything?
It's not about who's creating the value, it's about who's receiving it. The situation is a net positive for these people because they can have a grand old party at work with their buddies while getting huge compensation packages.Well, the harm would be having a completely dysfunctional corporate culture that destroys/drives off talent in an industry with a talent shortage.
If I were a hypothetical, completely amoral CEO who couldn't care less about human rights or dignity and only cared about profit, I still can't imagine thinking it's a net positive to have 5% of my employees turn the company into a abusive hellhole, unless that 5% were somehow creating 95% of the value and everyone else was completely interchangeable.
I think a big part of the problem is that having a FAANG company on your resume is a huge boost to employability so there's even more of an incentive for them to have higher turnover. Amazon in particular is known to be a shitty place to work at even for developers. Last time I checked they're still using stack ranking, which is a terrible management system that pretty much every other major company has stopped doing.Like I definitely see it with Amazon where they run warehouse workers into the ground because "they're all just interchangeable meat puppets anyway," but I just find it interesting that even tech companies have the same attitude when the terrible conditions don't even have a plausible link to output like slave-driving warehouse workers does.
I wonder if there's ever going to be a talent exodus from SV when workers finally realize that they can work at companies that aren't Wolf of Wall Street crossed with Revenge of the Nerds, but maybe money is priority #1 for both sides.
Yep, one of my college friends got a job there after graduation, 5 years later he is now the most senior person on his team because everyone has fled the toxic work environment with that Amazon Endorsement on their resume. He keeps trying but gets sucked back in 😬Amazon in particular is known to be a shitty place to work at even for developers.
I mean, Amazon is known to be toxic but staying at a tech company for 5 years is a pretty long time when the average churn for an engineer is 2.5 years.Yep, one of my college friends got a job there after graduation, 5 years later he is now the most senior person on his team because everyone has fled the toxic work environment with that Amazon Endorsement on their resume. He keeps trying but gets sucked back in 😬
yeah he's been needing to leave for a while. Sounds like he might FINALLY be leaving soon 🤞I mean, Amazon is known to be toxic but staying at a tech company for 5 years is a pretty long time when the average churn for an engineer is 2.5 years.
Yep, people will be upset and still preorder the new iPhone in a few months. It will take massive reporting and backlash for them to address abuse in their ranks it seems.
Aye, unfortunately you'll still get people posting "My new M1 MBA is the best laptop ever made!" or "The new iPhone is just soooo sexy!" and turning a completely blind eye to all of this, and if put on the spot they'll happily take having cool luxury tech gadgets over people being treated with basic human dignity and respect.Hopefully people remember this stuff when the next flashy device comes up for preorder. The more that comes out the worse this company seems jfc
Yep, my current team is the most women I've ever encountered in tech at a company before. Previously I would have 1 random person who might not stick around, but at this company we have I want to say about half the team are women which is surprising (in a good way).And people wonder why so many women don't want to be in (or stay in) tech.
Unfortunately the bigger the company it seems the easier it is for stuff like this to happen since they can all just... blend in and fall into the melting pot.Aye, unfortunately you'll still get people posting "My new M1 MBA is the best laptop ever made!" or "The new iPhone is just soooo sexy!" and turning a completely blind eye to all of this, and if put on the spot they'll happily take having cool luxury tech gadgets over people being treated with basic human dignity and respect.
This lady's story is horrendous. It's mindboggling how any company could allow this sort of shit to take place. I could almost see how it could happen at a tiny tech startup where the HR department is non-existent but Apple is a huge org and should (but obviously doesn't) have robust policies in place to prevent employees being harassed and abused.
I think that's probably true in tech companies but I'm not entirely sure it's true in all corporate cultures. Maybe it's because other, more established or traditional businesses (I'm thinking finance here as that's my industry) are a bit more risk-averse and tend to make sure that they don't leave themselves wide open to costly lawsuits - not that these industries don't have serious problems with bullying, harassment and mistreatment of employees, of course. It feels like tech companies are still a bit like the Wild West though, or are just a bit less mature. There's also the fact that these jobs tend to be in extremely high demand so there's a never-ending conveyor belt of fresh meat to be fed into the grinder.Unfortunately the bigger the company it seems the easier it is for stuff like this to happen since they can all just... blend in and fall into the melting pot.
yeah, believe its referencing this article she published in March
Unless I missed something in that article, it has nothing to do with Apple (?)yeah, believe its referencing this article she published in March
I thought I was dying: My apartment was built on toxic waste
Ashley Gjovik exposes the influence of a powerful corporation against the need for accountability and public safety on her journey to save her life. The challenges she encounters are ongoing for many people in the Bay Area, and they may not even know it yet. Her single victory has been the fight...sfbayview.com
The connection is what Vox will be working on is my guess. They must be related because this is the first item on her timeline of the Apple events.Unless I missed something in that article, it has nothing to do with Apple (?)
I am sorry but something is not right here. Look at her job description in that article from 5 months ago, and her job description as described in the tweets. How do these co exist? Again, unless I am missing something, e.g her Apple job was years ago.The connection is what Vox will be working on is my guess. They must be related because this is the first item on her timeline of the Apple events.
her apple job just ended last week (technically still going but shes on forced "leave")I am sorry but something is not right here. Look at her job description in that article from 5 months ago, and her job description as described in the tweets. How do these co exist? Again, unless I am missing something, e.g her Apple job was years ago.
But in the article that she wrote 5 months ago she describes herself as a law student (?)her apple job just ended last week (technically still going but shes on forced "leave")
In that article she said she was a law student while working a job as a program manager (that job being apple)But in the article that she wrote 5 months ago she describes herself as a law student (?)
Ah found it now, I only saw the description in the end of the article that omits the program manager part.In that article she said she was a law student while working a job as a program manager (that job being apple)