• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Pretty great on Amazon. They're preparing for the automation wave. The training is completely voluntary too.

This is where capitalism shines.

They still need to be broken up tho.

U.S. companies are increasingly paying up to retrain workers as new technologies transform the workplace and companies struggle to recruit talent in one of the hottest job markets in decades.

Amazon.com Inc. is the latest example of a large employer committing to help its workers gain new skills. The online retailer said Thursday it plans to spend $700 million over about six years to retrain a third of its U.S. workforce as automation, machine learning and other technology upends the way many of its employees do their jobs.

Companies as varied as AT&T Inc., Walmart Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Accenture PLC have embarked on efforts to prepare workers for new roles. At a time of historically low unemployment, coupled with rapid digital transformation that requires high-tech job skills, more U.S. companies said they want to help their employees transition to new positions—and they have their bottom line squarely in focus.
 

Speevy

Member
Oct 26, 2017
19,395
Lesson 1: How to run from one end of the warehouse to the other in 8 seconds without dropping a pre-assembled desk.
 

effingvic

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,380
Amazon will teach people how to piss and shit inside their bodies so they dont have to ever take bathroom breaks.
 
OP
OP
entremet

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Easy. Mutual edification. Amazon benefits with a more skilled workforce and workers are more skilled and thus command more in the employment market.

Employee training is has been dying in the last 30 years. This is a good thing. Low unemployment helps here.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Its kinda true. They will spend far less money training their existing employees to perform work that people that have degrees would and pay them far less than that same group.
Companies did lots of inhouse training for decades based off of things like entrance exams. The "entry level requires a degree and 5000 hours of professional photoshop experience" thing is a very much a modern construct and a company like Amazon re-embracing teaching its employees important new workplace skills is a good thing.

And yes, Amazon might not pay as well for hiring in house- but that's the nature of promotion from within - those employees should be able to jump to another job in the future leveraging those skills for a pay increase.
 

leder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,111
I am a strident Amazon critic, but this is a move in the right direction. The modern trend of corporations gutting employee training programs while simultaneously complaining about how they can't fill their open reqs is one of my hobby horses.
 

Dyle

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
30,058
Good for them, but I'm sure they've run the numbers and recognized that this will help their bottom line eventually anyway, it isn't an act of charity. The good pr and improvements to employee morale are surely worth more than the $700 million price tag
 

Spoit

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,045
But seriously, which third of their workforce. Retraining their programmers to build even more Machine Learning and automation tech probably doesn't help
 

Deleted member 5334

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,815
unknown.png
 

VariantX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,917
Columbia, SC
Who's getting this training is what I want to know, the tech guys and office workers at the mid/top level or the thousands of warehouse workers and delivery drivers?
 

Sensei

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
6,574
Entrement youre always posting these damn paywalled articles lol and i cant ever read the whole thing
 

devilhawk

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,536
Amazon (really both in the tech and warehouse sides) has such massive turnover that they won't need to retrain anybody. They'll just slowly train new hires as they shift more towards automation. So this article isn't really saying much.
 
OP
OP
entremet

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Entrement youre always posting these damn paywalled articles lol and i cant ever read the whole thing
Lol. You're on the few that reads them or tries lol.

I'll post alternate versions going forward. Usually the WSJ gets these "exclusives".
 

Darknight

"I'd buy that for a dollar!"
Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,918
Its kinda true. They will spend far less money training their existing employees to perform work that people that have degrees would and pay them far less than that same group.
Theoretically, depending on what they are training them for, those skills could be used elsewhere so it's in Amazon's interest to pay them enough to retain their investment. Otherwise they just spent money training people to leave for other companies.
 
OP
OP
entremet

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Do anecdotes overrule statistics in your world view?
Nah. I know capitalism isn't perfect but it's the best of available systems.

Also, I'm for breaking up the big tech companies and taxing them fairly, which they are not.

Moreover, I am for more compassionate capitalism similar to the Nordic countries.

Until we get a example of full bore socialism working IRL, I'll remain skeptical.

Besides, it will never happen and I'll rather work in reality.

I know there is vocal contingent against capitalism here. That's cool. We can be friends and disagree!
 

Kurdel

Member
Nov 7, 2017
12,157
I'll hear about the beauty of capitalism when they pay fucking taxes thank you very much
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
I too love when corporations sometimes throw us a bone in a way that only serves their interests to solve problems they're creating.
 

SugarNoodles

Member
Nov 3, 2017
8,625
Portland, OR
Nah. I know capitalism isn't perfect but it's the best of available systems.

Also, I'm for breaking up the big tech companies and taxing them fairly, which they are not.

Moreover, I am for more compassionate capitalism similar to the Nordic countries.

Until we get a example of full bore socialism working IRL, I'll remain skeptical.

Besides, it will never happen and I'll rather work in reality.

I know there is vocal contingent against capitalism here. That's cool. We can be friends and disagree!
Why do you need an example of "full bore socialism" working if you clearly dont need an example of "full bore capitalism" working?
 
OP
OP
entremet

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Why do you need an example of "full bore socialism" working if you clearly dont need an example of "full bore capitalism" working?
But that's the thing. We don't have full bore capitalism thankfully. Most societies are mixed economies. I do think the US needs some balancing definitely. Like I said the Nordic countries are filthy capitalists too yet the gave robust welfare systems. It's no an either/or scenario.

These are countries that rank high in standard of living in many research studies reliably.
 

Deleted member 5334

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,815
Forgive my earlier post, but I did admittedly find that statement a bit ridiculous.

My issue is it's very clear Amazon is exploiting their work force, and eventually they plan to get rid of a huge chunk of the more human work force if they can automate most of the process. While they'll always have some level of human operators and other areas in Amazon's work force, the fact they're trying to reduce the amount of people who work there, and leave a lot of workers without a job is just...

Plus, Amazon is by no MEANS hurting for income. Plus, as we have been finding out, they still continue to pay 0 taxes. That's a lot of money that arguably could go back into systems that could benefit people. Plus I'm almost certain most of that money doesn't go into the grunt work, by any means.
 

Mammoth Jones

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,371
New York
This is an incredibly pessimistic take lol.

Immigrants defy these every generation.

Facts. And not just immigrants. Nothing perfect but if your job is offering a training program and increases your viability as an employe you're a fool to whine at your desk about capitalism. Take the fucking training and increase your value in that job and the next.
 

TrueSloth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,069
Nah. I know capitalism isn't perfect but it's the best of available systems.

Also, I'm for breaking up the big tech companies and taxing them fairly, which they are not.

Moreover, I am for more compassionate capitalism similar to the Nordic countries.

Until we get a example of full bore socialism working IRL, I'll remain skeptical.

Besides, it will never happen and I'll rather work in reality.

I know there is vocal contingent against capitalism here. That's cool. We can be friends and disagree!
Our system has done a really good job with "capitalism is the best system in the world" propoganda.
 

SugarNoodles

Member
Nov 3, 2017
8,625
Portland, OR
But that's the thing. We don't have full bore capitalism thankfully. Most societies are mixed economies. I do think the US needs some balancing definitely. Like I said the Nordic countries are filthy capitalists too yet the gave robust welfare systems. It's no an either/or scenario.

These are countries that rank high in standard of living in many research studies reliably.
Right, so they keep capitalism in check. So again, why are you asking for examples of "full bore socialism"?
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Our system has done a really good job with "capitalism is the best system in the world" propoganda.
Capitalist mixed economies' economic productivity blowing out attempts at communist/socialism to he point where those countries had to adopt capitalist elements to allow them to actually start catching up isn't "propaganda."
Right, so they keep capitalism in check. So again, why are you asking for examples of "full bore socialism"?
Because many advocates love to talk about an inevitable post-scarcity post-capitalist world with the same religious fervor of a zealot describing the wonders of the inevitable afterlife.
 

Deleted member 25600

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,701
Capitalist mixed economies' economic productivity blowing out attempts at communist/socialism to he point where those countries had to adopt capitalist elements to allow them to actually start catching up isn't "propaganda."

Because many advocates love to talk about an inevitable post-scarcity post-capitalist world with the same religious fervor of a zealot describing the wonders of the inevitable afterlife.
Hmm...yes. I'm sure the CIA had nothing to do with it. It was all due to amazing productivity.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Hmm...yes. I'm sure the CIA had nothing to do with it. It was all due to amazing productivity.
Correct. Capitalism was going to inevitably do itself in because it was so horribly inefficient economically, which only adds to the tragedy of the ill-thought out destrictive interventions of the Cold War era. Vietnam abandoned their attempts at it and started moving towards a capitalist system after only about a decade after the Vietnam War because they rapidly figured out it wasn't working. China and Russia also did the same.

Here's two posts from last week on the topic- https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-hasn't-a-"true"-communist-nation-risen-and-survived.127617/post-22536813

 

Foffy

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
16,400
Not putting much faith into those, knowing most retraining programs fail people.

Sounds more like good marketing and nothing more.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Not putting much faith into those, knowing most retraining programs fail people.

Sounds more like good marketing and nothing more.
Retraining programs are usually attempting to move people to an entirely different industry - this is trying to make it so that they can retain workers in positions that aren't going away, but which will require specialized skills going forward.
 
OP
OP
entremet

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,519
Not putting much faith into those, knowing most retraining programs fail people.

Sounds more like good marketing and nothing more.
The labor market is tight. It's in Amazon's self interest to train current employees and keep them in the Amazon fold than double down on recruiting.

Think from the employer's POV to understand this investment.

Moreover, demographics are not the best as well and the current administration is not pro immigration.
 

Deleted member 25600

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,701
Correct. Capitalism was going to inevitably do itself in because it was so horribly inefficient economically, which only adds to the tragedy of the ill-thought out destrictive interventions of the Cold War era. Vietnam abandoned their attempts at it and started moving towards a capitalist system after only about a decade after the Vietnam War because they rapidly figured out it wasn't working. China and Russia also did the same.

Here's two posts from last week on the topic- https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-hasn't-a-"true"-communist-nation-risen-and-survived.127617/post-22536813

The United States used sanctions and trade embargos!

It's super effective!