I'm so terrified of ending up like this. I'm going to be in school until I'm at least 29, most likely 30. I never wanted things to end up like this.
That happens. You aren't a leech like this guy.I'm so terrified of ending up like this. I'm going to be in school until I'm at least 29, most likely 30. I never wanted things to end up like this.
http://i./i/newpix/2018/05/22/17/4C887EF600000578-0-image-a-31_1527007385723.jpg
Okay yeah, that's pretty much spot on with what I was thinking.
Yeah she got luckyYep, but it's a gamble. Once you enter housing court, you might never be able to rent in NY again.
Jesus lolhttp://i./i/newpix/2018/05/22/17/4C887EF600000578-0-image-a-31_1527007385723.jpg
Okay yeah, that's pretty much spot on with what I was thinking.
No hats in court.
Nothing so extravagant. I went to school until I turned 24 and I'm going back either this September or in January because I can't find a job in my field.
It's just a bummer when you set expectations for yourself, that I'd have a good job and my own place by this point in my life, and fail to meet them.
Downsizing is very common now. Most often it's required for retirement.I've know multiple people now that had a similar issue and in every case the solution was to sell their house and get a smaller place where the children weren't too keen in moving into. That's one way I guess.
I feel like your post only makes an argument for why we should blame the parents.
This guy looks exactly how I imagined.
Yep, I was able to save around 120k. Enough for 20% down on two houses.
Shit like this happens all the time. Most court proceedings are affluent white families trying to use the letter of the law as personal punishment against their relatives. People airing out their fuckin' dirty laundry doesn't deserve to be evening news.
In New York State, you can't just kick a family member out. He had a legal right to stay there until he didn't. The child seemed to be the one to bring the law into the proceedings, not the parents.
If it was up to the parents, they would be paying for his katana collection to be sitting in his studio apartment or some storage facility somewhere going off the earlier eviction notices.
You can't force the dude to go to therapy unless he is an imminent health risk. You can't force the dude to get a job. You can't force the dude to go to school. You can't force the dude to get his own place. What else are they supposed to do?
NY has some pretty tough tenant protection laws. You can't just put people on the street.
As long as you talk to your folks and help around the house as much as you can, you'll be as far away from this person as possible.
Maybe if you didn't buy up all the housing as 'investments' your children could afford to move out of your house and into their own, Boomers.
American parents sure are cold blood people.
I am glad i was born in Asia.
Our current house was originally owned by my grandparents then later passed down to my parents and it will later pass down to me and my siblings.
I just found out that this dead beat has a kid too. He expects his parents to carry him for life but doesn't want to support his own kid at all.
"Michael said that his issues with his parents, Mark and Christina, are tied to his custody battle over his son," Daily Mail reported. "Michael says he lost custody of his son, whose age he wouldn't disclose, back in September. The boy now lives with his mother full time, who Michael says he was never married to, or in a relationship with."
Daily Mail said he explained "his job at the moment was getting his son back." He told the British news site that he lived in his own apartment more than eight years ago but moved in with his parents when he lost a job. Daily Mail reported that Rotondo dropped out of community college and switched from engineering because he "couldn't hack the math."
Jesus Christ son, he's been a grown man for 12 years. You can't just leach off your family for your whole life.
It's strange to me too, but then I know my situation was unique. My parents were more than happy letting me stay with them as long as I wanted. Granted, I never wasn't working or wasn't in school while I lived there. I even brought up possibly giving my parents money one time and my father got angry (and my father never gets angry) accusing me of thinking he was some horrible parent ho only thought about money. I moved out when I got married at 28. Honestly it was great. I was able to save a lot of money and gave my wife and I a huge head start in life together.
Nope, at some point you have to take responsibility yourself for what a piece of shit you are. His time has arrived.I feel like your post only makes an argument for why we should blame the parents.
I wish rebound kids could see things from their parents point of view.
When you stay you rob your parents of their golden years together without you.
Get out of the way and let them live their lives. They sacrificed so much to raise you do not try and string out their sacrifice, because an additional adult not pulling their weight(no matter how much they love you) at home is a sacrifice.
If you love your parents, let them live again.
I get wanting your grown, 30 year old, son to move out or get a job.Jesus Christ son, he's been a grown man for 12 years. You can't just leach off your family for your whole life.
I don't think paying rent really had anything to do with this.
The guy had no job and seemingly no interest in doing anything with his life. At some point it obviously became too much for the parents to continue to support.
Greenwood listened quietly to Michael Rotondo's argument that he was entitled to six months more time. He gently corrected Rotondo by pointing to an appellate court decision ruling that family members don't get special treatment absent rare circumstances. And he praised Rotondo for his legal research.
Greenwood credited Rotondo's legal research in finding a prior case that appeared to show that family members get six months before an eviction. Rotondo dismissed his work as a simple internet search that took only minutes.
Greenwood provided a copy of the appellate court decision that overrode the case that Rotondo cited. Rotondo maintained that what Greenwood was doing was wrong.
And a child that he doesn't seem to want to take responsibility for. He got to go.
Michael says he lost custody of his son, whose age he wouldn't disclose, back in September. The boy now lives with his mother full time, who Michael says he was never married to, or in a relationship with.
He says he immediately filed an appeal as a 'poor person' so that his court fees could be waived going forward. But he says his parents complicated matters when they said he needed a job and health insurance if he was to continue living with them.
Michael refused, saying that his job at the moment was getting his son back.
When they offered to pay for his health insurance, Michael explained that he couldn't take that money because it would compromise getting the 'poor person' status.
"The Post and Daily Mail also note that Rotondo has another legal case running: He's suing Best Buy, claiming that he was wrongly fired for refusing to work on Saturdays."
Turns out the 6 months eviction doesn't apply, his parents are free to use normal eviction standards.
But supposedly he does!
Nevermind that he would never get custody without any kind of income...