• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

skullmuffins

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,426

Netherscourge

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,937
He sure seems calm and confident about the situation.

Even thanking the LAPD for their professionalism.

He's not taking the Trump "Witch Hunt" approach.
 

Kurdel

Member
Nov 7, 2017
12,157
How would somebody get false domestic abuse charges filed? Like, a crime that by definition requires the victim and perpetrator to know each other intimately? Do you think police would just do that without proof of a relationship? (Genuine questions I have no idea how this works)

I don't live in California and have no idea how the system works over there.

From the reports she seems to have gone to the police, then Avenatti went to the police, then he paid bail. From the descriptions it all seems to have been quick, so I doubt the police completed a full investigation and evidence gathering before arresting Avenatti. And considering the specific charge, I am sure she will be able to prove they were an item, that doesn't proclude any notions that there is foul play here (beyond of course, the allegations).
 
Oct 27, 2017
4,432
Then why did you say:



Someone went to the police and told them Avenatti assaulted them. He was arrested for it. You say you believe him over the "suspected assault".

No, I said "I'm not believing anyone".

Then the part you cut out said something about him finally being booked strongly swaying me in that direction, didn't it?

I think it's too early.

(Also, from the stories we've heard, the victim didn't go to the cops.) And the 'suspected assault' were the cops words while he was being held, since I believe it was reported by a 3rd party.

Now to catch up see if anything developed last couple hours.
 
Last edited:

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079

entrydenied

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
7,569
Yeah, since it's filed under domestic abuse, wouldn't the person have to know Avenatti in some capacity? Unless there's a long con. I know that with Worl's previous debacle and him participating in the conversation, along with Stormy's previous arrest for that weird ass rule (pun not intended), it makes it seem like it's possible to that it's a setup. But that's also one of the things that the alt-right Post Truth culture has managed to do, which it to throw the world and everything in it into a big Schrodinger's box.

I also doubt that they would actually arrest and book him if they haven't actually seen the victim.
 
Oct 26, 2017
520
I'm not sure what the plot here would be, though. Wohl sets up some woman to actually get beat up by Avenatti or fake injuries and claim it was him, and then claims credit for the setup on twitter immediately after news breaks of his arrest?

It definitely doesn't make much sense, but neither did his last plot. The fact that there was enough to go on for an actual arrest does up the credibility quite a bit, but Wohl is a known bad actor, so I'm going to need more information before I know where i land on this
 

entrydenied

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
7,569
It definitely doesn't make much sense, but neither did his last plot. The fact that there was enough to go on for an actual arrest does up the credibility quite a bit, but Wohl is a known bad actor, so I'm going to need more information before I know where i land on this

Yeah if it were a setup wouldn't it be more likely that it'll just be assault and not domestic abuse?
 

Deleted member 135

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,682
Yeah if it were a setup wouldn't it be more likely that it'll just be assault and not domestic abuse?
Domestic abuse allegations in California mandate an arrest, regardless of circumstances of accusations.


We just need to wait, we are all discussing this over scraps of information in a sea of disinformation.
 
Oct 25, 2017
16,738
This is the LAPD, not some backwater sheriff fiefdom. If the LAPD is going to arrest a white guy with $50K bail, there's probably some circumstantial evidence or probable cause they had beyond some twitter hoax.

Avenatti deserves due process but I'm exercising my public opinion by saying good riddance. He served Stormy Daniels well early on but clearly the fame got to him and started playing the reality show game like Trump with the need to constantly feed his ego instead of just sticking to the facts and serving his clients.

Until further information or details are announced I'm going to assume there's something to the arrest due to the bail amount. I'm not going to start believing conspiracy theories just because Republicans are evil until there's actual evidence of an ulterior plot.

Thank you
 

Slaythe

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,861
That did come to bind briefly too (well, not specifically Surefire, but some people actually capable), but it's a bit far fetched this would all be a setup as his wife could so easily deny it, as she has. Right now i'd wager perhaps a girlfriend and the initial reporting was mistaken, but this is all an interesting development.


Okay but this is coming from the guy who used HIS OWN PHOTO as the boss of his fake company ..............................
 

Deleted member 17092

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
20,360
Does CA have a bond/bail system where the bail is 50k but that means you really only have to pay 5k for bond and as long as you don't skip your hearings you're good? Either way thats a pretty high bail/bond. I would assume they have a pretty solid case.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,290
wherever
Don' t know why you cut their post there to try to put them on the spot...

Because that was the part of the post I was responding to?

Just like I'm doing now?

I didn't delete the original post, anyone can go back and read the whole thing. You can follow the little arrows through the whole conversation

Although I don't see how quoting this in full

he doesn't strike me as a physical abuser but I've been surprised before

Changes my original question
 

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079
Domestic abuse allegations in California mandate an arrest, regardless of circumstances of accusations.


We just need to wait, we are all discussing this over scraps of information in a sea of disinformation.
Your first statement is disinformation. Arrest is mandatory if they believe domestic violence occurred. We also know she has made allegations to the police and has injury.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,414
Phoenix
Does CA have a bond/bail system where the bail is 50k but that means you really only have to pay 5k for bond and as long as you don't skip your hearings you're good? Either way thats a pretty high bail/bond. I would assume they have a pretty solid case.
Most likely. I think it works that way in most states. I know it does in AZ. You need to come up with 10%. But you still need to cover the rest with collateral. I'm sure that's easy for a lawyer with assets.
 

Commedieu

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
15,025
Does CA have a bond/bail system where the bail is 50k but that means you really only have to pay 5k for bond and as long as you don't skip your hearings you're good? Either way thats a pretty high bail/bond. I would assume they have a pretty solid case.

I had to pay my full bail...

lawyer fucked me.
 
Oct 27, 2017
936
I never threw my support behind Avenatti (go as far back into my posting history as you want, it's not there), but all the crowing itt about how people 'told us so' and how Avenatti supporters should be ashamed of themselves is disingenuous as all fuck. You might have called him a fraud, a grifter, but I'd love to see evidence of someone predicting he's a woman beater before this story broke. Y'all are full of shit, and people are allowed to withdraw their support after this without being shamed for supporting an abuser before there was ever any evidence that he was one.
 
Oct 27, 2017
4,432
Your first statement is disinformation. Arrest is mandatory if they believe domestic violence occurred. We also know she has made allegations to the police and has injury.

Is it?

Before I saw this I was looking to see if that's true, found this:

"
Many law enforcement agencies now mandate that all domestic violence calls must end in the arrest of one or both of the parties involved. The police will attempt to determine who the aggressor is and then will arrest this party. The police will be looking for injuries, no matter how slight. In some cases, the person who actually called 911 will end up being arrested for domestic violence. The police will ask the victim if he or she wants an emergency protective order and will also ask if he or she wants to press charges. Even if the victim indicates that he or she does not want to press charges, the police will still make the arrest. The arrested party will be taken to jail and will be required to post bond in order to be released. If there were children present at the time of the incident, a copy of the arrest report will be sent to the Department of Public Social Services which will launch its own investigation.

Domestic Violence Investigations
Once a suspect has been arrested on suspicion of a domestic violence offense and is released from custody, he or she will be provided a future court date. Most police agencies have dedicated domestic violence units or detectives who investigate these types of offenses. Once an arrest report has been generated, a detective will be assigned to conduct an investigation. In many cases the detective will follow up with the alleged victim and may take additional statements from the victim, suspect or any other witness who was present. The suspect, through his or her attorney, can also present evidence to the detective.

If the detective believes that there is enough evidence to charge the suspect, the case will be submitted to the appropriate prosecuting agency for filing consideration. The detective will typically make a recommendation regarding what charges, if any, would be appropriate and whether or not the suspect should be charged with a felony or a misdemeanor. The detective may recommend that the suspect be charged with corporal injury to a spouse in violation of California Penal Code Section 273.5(a) PC, domestic battery pursuant to California Penal Code Section 243(e)(1) PC or one of several other domestic violence charges. The prosecution may conduct its own investigation when determining what, if any, charges to file."

So I'll probably wait til he's charged by the detective, assuming it follows the path outlined above. Or until we hear from the woman of course, but that may not happen in a DV case.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
He sure seems calm and confident about the situation.

Even thanking the LAPD for their professionalism.

He's not taking the Trump "Witch Hunt" approach.
He's still a lawyer at the end of the day. He should be an expert at remaining calm under legal pressures even if he's guilty.
 

Rigby

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
693
We should believe survivors and all women, anyone claiming "it's a conspiracy" should be ashamed of themselves.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
He's still a lawyer at the end of the day. He should be an expert at remaining calm under legal pressures even if he's guilty.
f86.png
 
Oct 28, 2017
5,341
We should believe survivors and all women, anyone claiming "it's a conspiracy" should be ashamed of themselves.

When someone just tried to pay women to make fake sexual allegations against Robert Mueller, not immediately assuming guilt without evidence or an investigation isn't a conspiracy, it's rational.
 

enzo_gt

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,299
Surefire is capitalizing on the pandemonium, I wouldn't believe anything from them even if Avenatti was framed (which there is zero evidence for, so we should stop perpetuating that).

Remember, those who opposite democracy favour chaos and uncertainty, and that's Surefire's role right now. Also, saying that they claimed responsibility is pretty disingenuous.
 

MrToughPants

Member
Oct 30, 2017
2,164
We're told Wednesday afternoon the woman was on the sidewalk on her cellphone with sunglasses covering her eyes, sobbing and screaming on the phone, "I can't believe you did this to me. I'm going to get a restraining order against you."

We're told security brought her inside the building, took her upstairs and Michael showed up 5 minutes later and ran into the building. He screamed repeatedly, "She hit me first." We're told he angrily added, "This is bulls***, this is f***ing bulls***." We're told he tried getting into the elevator but security denied him access.

Sure sounds like something a high profile lawyer would do.
 

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079
Is it?

Before I saw this I was looking to see if that's true, found this:

"
Many law enforcement agencies now mandate that all domestic violence calls must end in the arrest of one or both of the parties involved. The police will attempt to determine who the aggressor is and then will arrest this party. The police will be looking for injuries, no matter how slight. In some cases, the person who actually called 911 will end up being arrested for domestic violence. The police will ask the victim if he or she wants an emergency protective order and will also ask if he or she wants to press charges. Even if the victim indicates that he or she does not want to press charges, the police will still make the arrest. The arrested party will be taken to jail and will be required to post bond in order to be released. If there were children present at the time of the incident, a copy of the arrest report will be sent to the Department of Public Social Services which will launch its own investigation.

Domestic Violence Investigations
Once a suspect has been arrested on suspicion of a domestic violence offense and is released from custody, he or she will be provided a future court date. Most police agencies have dedicated domestic violence units or detectives who investigate these types of offenses. Once an arrest report has been generated, a detective will be assigned to conduct an investigation. In many cases the detective will follow up with the alleged victim and may take additional statements from the victim, suspect or any other witness who was present. The suspect, through his or her attorney, can also present evidence to the detective.

If the detective believes that there is enough evidence to charge the suspect, the case will be submitted to the appropriate prosecuting agency for filing consideration. The detective will typically make a recommendation regarding what charges, if any, would be appropriate and whether or not the suspect should be charged with a felony or a misdemeanor. The detective may recommend that the suspect be charged with corporal injury to a spouse in violation of California Penal Code Section 273.5(a) PC, domestic battery pursuant to California Penal Code Section 243(e)(1) PC or one of several other domestic violence charges. The prosecution may conduct its own investigation when determining what, if any, charges to file."

So I'll probably wait til he's charged by the detective, assuming it follows the path outlined above. Or until we hear from the woman of course, but that may not happen in a DV case.
You do realize there is a difference between some law enforcement agencies and the actual law of California, correct?
 

Jon Carter

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,746
Don't really care who else does it. One person doing a shitty thing doesn't justify someone else doing it.

The point is it's not a shitty thing. It's clearly stated multiple times on the page before you give your money and it's a common thing. It was never meant as a trick, it's just how it works. Somebody who didn't know how these things work made a stink about it thinking it was some shady scam concocted by Avenatti when it wasn't.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,290
wherever
I mean, someone saying their gut has been wrong before is a non negligible thing to ignore

Nobody ignored it. That part of the post doesn't magically disappear from reality if it's not used in a quote. I read the whole post. You read the whole post. The person who wrote the post obviously read it.

when passively aggressively

That seems to be your modus operandi for this entire thread but alright
 
Status
Not open for further replies.