What a bummer. If they put more effort into this and had a better selection of games, I would have been all over it. I can dust off my PSTV and have a better PS1 player than this.
Yes but those visual changes and edits were made for censorship/localization purporses and here Nintendo lost a great opportunity to be both a solid collection and nostalgia ridden item and be a good educational outlet at the same time.
Mgs without vibration is gonna make psycho-mantis look goofy AF.
Did not expect much, yet I leave dissappointed.
Yes but that doesn't mean there isn't a bunch of great games on it. People are going to bitch about anything and the ps1 has such a diverse lineup that it won't please everyone since we all want different games on it.have you seen the tepid (i'm being generous here) response to game lineup?
Yeah. Really weird decision there.That's a worrying quote. Makes me wonder if some games are 50hz
Yeah, my guess is Sony has already planned for a superior version of the PS1 Classic to release after the first wave (with dual shock and a better selection of games).I feel like they're almost definitely making a revised model next year for about $130 with a better lineup and dualshocks to compete with N64 Classic's enviable release.
Yes but that doesn't mean there isn't a bunch of great games on it. People are going to bitch about anything and the ps1 has such a diverse lineup that it won't please everyone since we all want different games on it.
Pretty much like all these classic machines, all about novelty and nostalgia factor.
We still don't know how is the input lag on this thing.They feel soupy in the hand - though that's as much the fault of modern displays compared to the more responsive CRTs these games were designed for than anything else.
ok? doesn't change my point at all if anything it's exactly what I said.It's certainly not going to please Gran Turismo, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Tomb Raider and Medievil fans I can say that much.
Sound like Sony doesn't care about PS1 legacy and just want some quick buck after the retro plug & play console rise in popularity.
NES/SNES classic are good but they are the only good plug and play consoles i guess. Oh, i heard SNK mini is decent too.
How was the SNES CLASSIC better than the NES CLASSIC?
I think both were awesome :)
ok? doesn't change my point at all if anything it's exactly what I said.
How was the SNES CLASSIC better than the NES CLASSIC?
I think both were awesome :)
It'll be for multi-language support. Shame that there's no option to switch between the two though, or that English speaking countries in PAL-land can't have the NTSC versions.
Sony doesn't give a fuck of their games:
Oh boy this is really sad Digital Foundry and My Life in Gaming on this should be fun
Yeah, my guess is Sony has already planned for a superior version of the PS1 Classic to release after the first wave (with dual shock and a better selection of games).
ok? doesn't change my point at all if anything it's exactly what I said.
This thing has got to be my biggest gaming disappointment of the year... easily. The PS1 is my all-time favourite console, there is no other system I have such sheer nostalgia and fond memories of, but the PlayStation Classic feels like such a wasted opportunity. Based on these articles, it's clearly just some hastily-cobbled together cash grab. I mean, when the full list emerged, my stomach sank anyway - I can't say I'm particularly eager to pay £90 for a device with Battle Arena Toshinden, Cool Boarders 2, Rainbow Six and Rayman on it - but these new details have cemented how lacklustre a product this is. Only one save state, 50Hz version of games, the cruddy interface and general lack of options. Seems like Sony doesn't give a fuck about their legacy enough to do their first ever console justice.
I'll cancel my pre-order, put that money towards a PSVR investment and hope that the hacking scene comes through later down the line. Fucks sake Sony, come on.
Anyhoo, this is a nice quote from the Eurogamer article that made me feel all fuzzy inside...
Jumping Flash! felt so ground-breaking back in '96 (when I played it... I think). Where's that VR sequel?!
If sony owned the ip than it would be equivalent but chances are the reason it's not is because of the remaster.Crash Bandicoot is literally the best selling series on the damn console in the USA. not having the mascot of the console on the system is very much analogous to not having a SMB representation on the NES Classic.
I don't know why you have to pretend to speak down to me, I'm not telling anyone they can't be dissapointed and I stand by the fact nobody was every going to be happy by the lineup. Heck there are other games I wish were on it.I know. I'm just extrapolating your point by specifying just who exactly could be disappointed by this console's games. You may even have heard of 1 or 2 of those franchises as well I reckon.
I know. I'm just extrapolating your point by specifying just who exactly could be disappointed by this console's games. You may even have heard of 1 or 2 of those franchises as well I reckon.
If sony owned the ip than it would be equivalent but chances are the reason it's not is because of the remaster.
How about a proper CRT filter for any of this? How hard is it to get something like CRT Easy Mode setup for a system like this?
Nintendo didn't bother as well on their NES classic the emulator is nothing more than the BSD version of Higan stripped of all of the other cores (so GB / GBC / GBA / SNES)
Same story with the SNES classic it's nothing more than the SNES core of the BSD version of Higan that has been slightly repurposed.
Thanks for the idea, but the UK store only has Parasite Eve 2.You could get a PS Vita, PSTV, PSP, or PS3 at less than the price of a Classic and play that right now.
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP9000-NPUJ00662_00-0000000000000001
both destruction derby and coolboarders are great games though. I understand wanting other games on it but again there are reasons why they are not on.i mean, the franchises you mentioned are pretty key and would do a good job in appealing to the casual/lapsed gamer market that the NES/SNES classic did.
see above. consumers aren't going to care about licensing deals, they're going to care about being able to play the games they remember on the system. i'm sure casual gamers are dying to play the first destruction derby and a coolboarders game over Crash or Gran Turismo.
Most PS1 games are barely sufferable nowadays anyways. Most of them aged way worse than SNES or even some NES games.
The 60Hz Resident Evil games on the PlayStation Store weren't because they wanted to "offer a better performance". Those were games that were published in Europe by Virgin Interactive, under license from Capcom. Since Virgin had imploded, there was no license to publish the European version of those games. Capcom got around that by publishing the US versions instead.I don't understand the decision to release PAL isos, anyway. I mean, italian users here and Sony had no problem on putting on PSN US versions of RE1, 2 and 3, yes they miss the italian language but they come with 60 Hz at least, so they sacrificed the language to offer a better performance.
It's just you.Maybe it's just me but it seems the gaming press is being way more harsher on Sony for this than Nintendo.
I really don't get why Nintendo is the only company allowed to make classic consoles.
Lol, people brought you like 5 valid reasons and you ignore all of them to go "it's just my opinion man." Feels over reals.