• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

What was FIFA World Cup 2018 Goal of the Tournament?

  • Nacho v Portugal

    Votes: 1 3.0%
  • C. Ronaldo v Spain

    Votes: 1 3.0%
  • B. Pavard v Argentina

    Votes: 25 75.8%
  • N. Chadli v Japan

    Votes: 5 15.2%
  • D. Cheryshev v Croatia

    Votes: 1 3.0%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .

Kylo Rey

Banned
Dec 17, 2017
3,442
it was a handball for a simple reason:
Croatian players did nothing to talk to the referee.
They knew.
 

Hadok

Member
Feb 14, 2018
5,838
DiLC-eSW4AIR3MG.jpg

DiLDAagW0AUMlvC.jpg
 

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
It was a handball because the precedent was set earlier during the group stage where VAR awarded penatlies for even softer and limper low hanging arms then this.

if you are going to awarded it for one limp arm in Iran x Portugal, than you awarded for a all handballs no matter what.

I don't like it, but the VAR precedent is set.

if people don't like it, then it should be reviewed for future tournaments.

But if we start looking at "intent" we then open it up to interpretation

 

Sirolf

Chicken Chaser
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
438
Le Mans , France
User Banned (1 Day): Inflammatory generalizations towards another member
Not the first time d9b has an anti-french resentment..I remember arguing with him on Macron .
 

Vinimaw

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,069
Problem is: if you change the rule players will start to defend while stretching their arms, arguing that they didn't move them and it was not intentional when the ball hits them.
There's a reason why this rule works the way it does, and why yesterday's action had to be a penalty.
That's my point actually. They need to remove the "deliberate" from the rule. If the hand touch the ball and the arm is not sticked to the body then it's penalty.
Most of the time the players don't want to stop the ball with the hand, and i'm sure it was the case here, Mandzukic is not that stupid and it goes really fast but there was a penalty based only on the fact that the ball trajectory was changed a lot.
 

Shito

Member
Oct 26, 2017
329
That's my point actually. They need to remove the "deliberate" from the rule. If the hand touch the ball and the arm is not sticked to the body then it's penalty.
Most of the time the players don't want to stop the ball with the hand, and i'm sure it was the case here, Mandzukic is not that stupid and it goes really fast but there was a penalty based only on the fact that the ball trajectory was changed a lot.
Oh, ok, I didn't get that from your post!
Yeah we do agree on that part, then! :)
 

Iceternal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,502
It was a handball because the precedent was set earlier during the group stage where VAR awarded penatlies for even softer and limper low hanging arms then this.

if you are going to awarded it for one limp arm in Iran x Portugal, than you awarded for a all handballs no matter what.

I don't like it, but the VAR precedent is set.

if people don't like it, then it should be reviewed for future tournaments.

But if we start looking at "intent" we then open it up to interpretation

He moved his hand towards the ball when it was close, it's not like his arm was up and in the direction of the ball beforehand. We can never know intent, unless we create a mind probing machine...
 

VincentMatts

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,664
Canada
Who cares, Croatia was only able to score one goal. Remove the "controversial" goals and that's still 2-1.

France wins.

Yeah France wins anyway. Its not as if they won the WC on that goal.

Stick your arms to your body or don't complain

To me that was a penalty. The guy is clearly looking at the ball coming and moving his arm down towards the ball hoping to deflect it. If he wasnt looking at the ball, its one thing. He clearly was. He knew what he was doing.

When people dont wanna to touch the ball with their arms, they move their arms away from the ball, not towards it.
 

Mass_Pincup

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
7,139
That's not how that works. Change one event, and the whole chain of following events is completely changed.

I know, that's why the "it should've been 2-2" is dumb.

No one knows what would've happen if those "controversial goals" (personally I think both were ok) didn't happen. For all that we know, France could've scored more than that.

Croatia would have gone in ahead at HT. Llrois' mistake could have handed them the trophy.

What could have been on another day

Lloris' mistake wouldn't happen because he would not try that without the 3 goal lead with only 15min left.

We could also say that Croatia wouldn't score because the drive to equalize wouldn't be there.

It's pointless to do this kind of things and while Croatia played well, France was way more clinical in their offense.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,567
Why even talk about the penality.

The Griezmann dive that led to the 1:0 was a 100% wrong decision by the ref. It doesn't matter what happend after. The ref massively impacted the game with a wrong decision that led to an early goal
 

jaxom

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
122
Why even talk about the penality.

The Griezmann dive that led to the 1:0 was a 100% wrong decision by the ref. It doesn't matter what happend after. The ref massively impacted the game with a wrong decision that led to an early goal


There was a lot of referee errors on BOTH sides, it's just that France managed to capitalize on this one.

Its football.

And we can replay the match 20 times i'll still put France winning 9 times out of 10 . Croatia played incredibly well and France badly for their normal level ( kante was sick ) , but in the end croatia , with all their beautiful play and ball possession that they had, was rarely really dangerous, less than france even with such a bad game on france side.

Gary Neville said it well , it's like seeing a middleweight and a heavyweight fight, middleweight can dance and do the show, but when the heavyweight punch ...

The better team is the one that make the goals.
 

Kromeo

Member
Oct 27, 2017
17,951
The fact experienced refs can't even agree on whether or not it should be a penalty would suggest it should never have gone to VAR in the first place. The game's done and gone but it is interesting for the future of the technology
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,567
There was a lot of referee errors on BOTH sides, it's just that France managed to capitalize on this one.

Of course

it just sucks when a blatantly obvious dive leads to a 1:0 in the world cup final just to have Croatia come back and then have a controversial penalty give France the lead again.

I have no problem with France winning and they were among the teams I was rooting for but this could have been a much better final game
 
Oct 27, 2017
2,432
That was a fun ride... I'm checking out...Shame next Word Cup is in Qatar.
After all said and done, hope there's no hard feelings and...
Congrats France Era !!! ;)
 

bionic77

Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,900
Of course

it just sucks when a blatantly obvious dive leads to a 1:0 in the world cup final just to have Croatia come back and then have a controversial penalty give France the lead again.

I have no problem with France winning and they were among the teams I was rooting for but this could have been a much better final game
Isn't that part of the game?

He pulled it off beautifully. I think in real time it was impossible for any ref to see that.

At worst it might hurt his rep with future refs who will be slower to award a foul but it helped his country win the WC and I bet almost all players would have tried the same thing if they could get away with it.

All the soccer fans complain about it all the time but I feel like literally everyone does it. And nothing is done to address it so we may as well get used to it.
 

jaxom

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
122
Of course

it just sucks when a blatantly obvious dive leads to a 1:0 in the world cup final just to have Croatia come back and then have a controversial penalty give France the lead again.


I agree it was not the way anybody was seeing the first half of the match, but the penalty was not controversial ;) we don't know if the defender was voluntarily cheating or made a stupid mistake ( the gif pushes more for the former reason), but it's on him on both cases.
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,734
That's my point actually. They need to remove the "deliberate" from the rule. If the hand touch the ball and the arm is not sticked to the body then it's penalty.
Most of the time the players don't want to stop the ball with the hand, and i'm sure it was the case here, Mandzukic is not that stupid and it goes really fast but there was a penalty based only on the fact that the ball trajectory was changed a lot.

So then what happens when you have this scenario again?

unknown.png


That's still a penalty? Seems ultra harsh for a ball-to-hand that the player had no control over. This is why I don't think the solution is to get rid of the "deliberate" wording.
 

Charamiwa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,075
This thread is a bummer. Though we'd be talking about the French team arriving home and the crowd at the Champs.
 

Madjaba

Banned
May 16, 2018
90
So then what happens when you have this scenario again?

unknown.png


That's still a penalty? Seems ultra harsh for a ball-to-hand that the player had no control over. This is why I don't think the solution is to get rid of the "deliberate" wording.

Problem is that the course of the ball is modified. Leaving it up to interpretation is what makes it so hard for people to know exactly if something can be considered as a fault or not.

As hard as it can look, I think that any change of trajectory with a "forbidden" part of the body which prevent a potential goal opportunity (as in any situation where the offensive can take advantage of the initial course of the ball) shall be whistled.

Yeah sometimes it's hard but at least it could bring consistency to those kind of calls.
 

Regulus Tera

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,458
24 hours later, it's actually kinda scary how France never looked in a hurry. They only really went down vs Argentina for 9 minutes, and besides the Belgium match they always seemed in control of play. There hasn't been been such a thoroughly "comfortable" performance from a Champion since 2002.
 

Wazzy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,070
Why even talk about the penality.

The Griezmann dive that led to the 1:0 was a 100% wrong decision by the ref. It doesn't matter what happend after. The ref massively impacted the game with a wrong decision that led to an early goal
That didn't impact the game. Croatia were awarded a free kick from a weak call and equalized.
24 hours later, it's actually kinda scary how France never looked in a hurry. They only really went down vs Argentina for 9 minutes, and besides the Belgium match they always seemed in control of play. There hasn't been been such a thoroughly "comfortable" performance from a Champion since 2002.
Yup. People were shitting on them after every single game but they never look threatened throughout this World Cup.