Let's just say my company uses the height of conferencing tech with Webex and without video cams and locks down only approved softwareWhat program do y'all use? There's ones where you can see both cursors on screen so pointing to things shouldn't be an issue. Also being able to record the videos for reference so the new employee can learn with a guide without fully taking up your time can be a huge plus.
If productivity isn't reduced, and onboarding isn't compromised, then a company wouldn't have a financial incentive to force working in an office right?
I'm not sure why people think that companies would even want offices if WFH was just as productive. Wouldn't companies save ungodly amounts of money by not having big campuses?
I'm obviously excluding those who don't have the means, in that case the company should help provide the means or let people have the option to sit in an office space that provides them. But it doesn't have to be some people are unproductive therefore we have to cater to those people. Also obviously like others have said it greatly differs by industry but I think the flexibility is something everyone should strive for as best in class. Just the realities that meetings/companies are becoming more global in the people they work with and even the teams in the business.This is a really myopic take, as not everyone has the same life circumstance.
From personal experience of myself and colleagues in my team:
...
-Specifically during lockdown, but it still happens, colleagues will call you beyond office time because you're home anyways (less free time)
-No clear distinction between an office and home environment (like the aforementioned having family around and working naked) means you can end up working more hours than scheduled (boost in productivty but less free time)
I'm all for working from home, but there are clear downsides
A lot of places are accounting for people having to care for children while working. And then there are surely some employees who are fully ghosting.Is anyone factoring in the current state of the world into people's productivity?
I agree, and I do the same as you, but most of my colleagues keep asking for questions in the team group or discuss changes/developments and so on, sometimes even up to 2 hours after we're supposed to be done working, so they clearly suffer from the second point and end up enabling the first point. I only answer phone calls from my CEO beyond working hours (and I probably could avoid doing so if I wanted to be picky), and 10mins after my working day is done I'm already playing videogames, but the vast majority of my colleagues seem to suffer from both. Not sure if you're IT-development-savvy, but a guy on my team even pushed some code to GIT at 2AM and we didn't even have any pressing deadlines (and that day he worked like 6 hours of overtime). This is Italy in a very worker-friendly company, I can't even imagine what's going on in Accenture or in more rough environments/contract situationsNot to specifically pick on you, but I've seen these two sentiments a few times on this thread and I'm confused why these would be considered issues.
If someone calls me beyond office time, they are shit out of luck until tomorrow. Just because I'm home doesn't mean I'm available to someone.
I'm also perplexed how one can work more hours than scheduled unless you are either determined to or lose track of time. I am not a charity, so I don't work for free. If I work over hours, I expect to be compensated for that time in the form of extra money or leaving early, etc. My free time is important to me. If losing track of time is an issue, set an alarm on your phone to let you know when to clock off. Then clock off. :p
I can't imagine only WFH 2 days a week than again I don't see any reason to go back into the office full time ever. I'd rather WFH most days.I'm 3 days in the office and 2 days WFH. It's perfect for me. I can't imagine doing WFH full time.
I think it particularly makes sense when it comes to newer employees. Best solution when possible, imo, would be a hybrid setup. Get enough meeting time, training time in, but don't be there so much that it turns into an office grind.Companies Start to Think Remote Work Isn’t So Great After All
Projects take longer. Collaboration is harder. And training new workers is a struggle. “This is not going to be sustainable.”www.wsj.com
This reflects my experience as well. People have adapted to work, but productivity is down quite a bit. More junior employees, people who are shier/neurodivergent/introverted/who require more direction and feedback never get a chance to speak up and/or learn. It really benefits people who are already more outgoing and willing to speak over others or people who already hold positions of seniority. No one really asks casual questions and learns stuff through osmosis. Brainstorming and getting feedback on ideas is much harder. Perhaps for lone wolf workers this is a no-difference or even an improvement, but a lot of people who depend on others have been struggling. Teams are becoming more distanced and people aren't as aware of what each other are doing. People are getting much more fatigued in meetings and it's much harder to communicate. I know some view this work from home situation as a boon overall, and it should definitely be available as an option going forward, for many it has been quite challenging. Let alone the people with kids at home that they have to take care of.
Of course, people should absolutely be given the option to work in the environment they prefer once this is all over.
Just to be super crystal clear, no one should be asked to go back to the office before it is 100% safe. This thread isn't about that. That's not even up for debate. It's about how it's been challenging to adapt to these new conditions.
I feel that some are going to paint this as "managers want to lord over their employees" but it's much more than that, individual contributors are struggling as well