I feel like this also ignores a lot of toxic shit that goes on in the office: microagressions, loneliness, isolation, bullying, sense of being constantly compared to other employees, etc.
The article says that someone will whisper to you what something means. Usually, new employees don't get those kinds of hints, because everyone is just focused on what they need to do. People are incredibly petty in person.
While it may not work for everyone, WFH is great for me. Has been before COVID, will be after.
Yup. The article doesn't go into the drawbacks of the office work life. Getting to know your co-workers is great... when you get along. It's awful when you don't. There's also the downsides of getting along too well. Work inappropriate relationships, cliques, long periods of distraction due to conversation, etc...
I don't think that any of the people interviewed are intentionally ignoring these things but since working in person has existed since work has existed, it's taken as a given that these things will happen and that remote work lessens these occurrences isn't being taken into account yet.
I'm also curious as to why there's a strong view that apps like Slack, Zoom, or even Discord don't allow for socialization. Moment to moment questions and such shouldn't be any less likely through a message sent over text and it would seem to support better productivity overall. For more group based collaboration work, Ventrilo/Mumble/Teamspeak with PTT should suffice well in giving workers the ability to contribute and collaborate moment-to-moment without the lack of privacy that something like a video or open call does.
As for the lack of learning through office osmosis, that seems pretty valid but I'd have to agree with previous posters that suggest this issue is one that seems prevalent because of poor training programs in general. In effect, Executives are relying heavily on their Veteran Workers to train Novices for free on the job to make up for lackluster official training.
In the end I'm really left with the impression that the shortcomings listed in the article are far more of a result of businesses just not being able to adapt completely in a short amount of time to a new work paradigm than having to do with WFH being an objectively less productive arrangement. The only real change that I can see in a general sense is with people who are less productive in a WFH environment due to the office providing an unspoken pressure to compete with your co-workers.