The point I tried to make was how do they continue the Switch model while giving it the power third party devs need?
Third parties will always make an excuse to not support Nintendo.People are just asking for enough power to have more third party ports, not 8k 120fps.
The point I tried to make was how do they continue the Switch model while giving it the power third party devs need?
I agree with this. Well stated.The stationary console centric bias this forum has is honestly frustrating sometimes.
It should be clear as day Nintendo isn't straying from the handheld hybrid approach, no matter what Sony and Microsoft does. The Switch brings together the two things the company has always been able to sell - portables and software - while still allowing them to exist in an adjacent market virtually unopposed by a direct competitor. The only technological requirements we can (and should) expect from the eventual Switch successor is that it maintains parity with high-end/premium mobile devices.
Nintendo however is never EVER going back to creating stationary home consoles. The 30+ years of sales data where they achieved a 50% success rate during that span, and where it completely bottomed out with the Wii U, is the exact reason why Nintendo went hybrid in the first place.
The point I tried to make was how do they continue the Switch model while giving it the power third party devs need?
Isn't the Switch proof they don't need to do that?The point I tried to make was how do they continue the Switch model while giving it the power third party devs need?
Doomed since 1889, they should have gone third-party at the end of the Meiji era.
Eternal should be out at some point.
pretty much this.Continue to make some of the best games in the industry. That's working for them right now regardless of teraflops.
They will...in the portable domainI want Nintendo to go hardcore again with specs. At least one time. I want a XSX-like Nintendo console.
all their excuses have been valid, even since the N64 nintendo's refusal to play ball with current technology (whether it was standard discs with N64/GC or the poor hardware of wii and beyond) has been a wall for third partiesThird parties will always make an excuse to not support Nintendo.
Nintendo doesn't need to do anything. They have the IPs to remain successful for the next century.
So Nintendo doesn't need 3rd party games? Good lord the hubris sometimes. If anyone should be asking any questions, they should be asking how will Nintendo deal with 3rd parties utilizing the power of SSDs for their games while having to scale down massively for the Switch? Or are we just going to ignore that and posted another "Nintendo is doomed!" meme?
Nintendo have managed quite well without major support from 3rd parties, so no. See: NPD, MC. They are fortunate to have built a gargantuan line-up of successful first party IPs.
You just made me realized...So, they can keep building on this foundation and hopefully have a future model where... joycons don't drift.