• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,336
wherever
Bernie doesn't need Virginia or North Carolina to do well on Super Tuesday. He definitely needs to keep his losses to single digits though.

The best case scenario for Bernie is for Biden to get below 15 percent statewide in California. If that happens (and no one else is viable), Bernie will get receive all statewide delegates from California.

I didn't say anything about North Carolina, that's almost assuredly going to Biden. As for Virginia, Bernie actually polls pretty well there and it'd be a big upset for a state most would expect Biden to carry. Biden's polling seems to hover around 13-15 points in Cali and that's not factoring a boost from South Carolina. I could see late undecideds breaking to Biden after SC and Pete out of the race putting him over viability.
 

metalslimer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,569
Honestly, I'm of the mind that Bernie walks into the convention with a plurality, not a majority, and has to make some concessions to get the moderates on board, and ultimately ends up as the nominee.

Still gonna be incredibly messy though.

The thing in this messy scenario though is if dems cave and put M4A (bernies version)in the party platform. I have always felt like that was going to be the messiest and most contentious issue in any "healing" process
 

Deleted member 4346

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,976
Honestly, I'm of the mind that Bernie walks into the convention with a plurality, not a majority, and has to make some concessions to get the moderates on board, and ultimately ends up as the nominee.

Still gonna be incredibly messy though.

This seems the likely scenario. The best result is that Sanders gets a commanding lead Tuesday and carries that to a majority, because I wonder what concessions Bernie can give and not alienate his own movement.
 

Lump

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,207
So, North Korea just launched "something" at South Korea.

The Dow is going to be a bloodbath tomorrow and Trump is going to panic.



Time to send our coins to North Korea to remind them that there's supposed to be peace.

4000.jpg
 

GoldenEye 007

Roll Tide, Y'all!
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,833
Texas
This seems the likely scenario. The best result is that Sanders gets a commanding lead Tuesday and carries that to a majority, because I wonder what concessions Bernie can give and not alienate his own movement.
I think that would have to be essentially a public option - M4A Who want it. Allow it to be a plan as a choice alongside existing employer offers - obviously if you're a contractor or otherwise don't have insurance through work, you can opt into a Medicare plan at any age at the appropriate income-based pricing. But in the legislation, he'll have to make it competitive where workers and employers would prefer people go to that plan due to it being one larger pool - reducing individual costs over existing pricing/offers. That means competitive pricing for employees and less needed subsidies on the part of employers.

That's a compromise I think that's quite reasonable while still having a chance to revolutionize the healthcare industry.
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
I don't think so. If anyone can find any instance of this ever happening, I'd love to know.
The sample size of democratic primaries is tiny. The sample size of democratic primaries with this many candidates hitting viability is much smaller. Not even to mention the delegate counts haven't remained the same over time.
 

Crocodile

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,119
I wished I liked Biden or Sanders more. Both kind of suck in their own ways and I feel put off by either "surging" :/

I will at least say, to Sanders defense, this notion of "OMG HE CAN'T POSSIBLY WIN SO WE GOTTA PANIC AND SCREAM" seems unwarranted. For a lot of Dem elites, I feel they are making an electablity argument but they are doing it more based on their feelings than straight facts (like say Sanders was consistently trailing Trump by like 7 points in every poll then it would make more sense to put the brakes on him).

So my predictions from two weeks ago are mostly coming true:
www.resetera.com

US PoliEra 2020 |OT 2| Dershowitz says "Quid Pro Quo on the Go?" [See Staff Post]

I'm going to make bold (most likely wrong) predictions. - Biden will squeak out a 2nd place finish in Iowa, staying his political execution. - Bloomberg will qualify for the Wednesday debate - Bloomberg will under-perform in the debate - The combination of a mediocre debate and negative...

I pretty much nailed it except for Booty getting out before Super Tuesday. Keep in mind these predictions seemed mostly outlandish two weeks ago.

I don't recall exactly what I said a few weeks ago so maybe I gotta eat some crow but nothing about the above ever seemed outlandish. It was more a "best case scenario for Biden" not a "when pigs fly" scenario.

Warren has been doing the Lord's work ever since she flayed Bloomberg on national TV.

She's definitely more ideologically closer to Sanders but I bet she's also wary of a Bernie Presidency. Warren at least wraps her strong progressive plans/ideals with a layer of pragmatism. I honestly believe she could have easily chosen to run in the outer edge of the moderate lane but she went for a different strat in the late spring early / summer. I honestly don't know if it was a mistake or not. Kamala and Beto occupied the squishy middle and they got almost no traction in the crowded field. Warren actually made it to election day unlike the other two.

It's just Warren often gets painted as Far Left, but aside from her utter disdain for Wall-street, she actually could have positioned as a Lefty-Moderate / Pragmatic Progressive if she hadn't gone all-in for M4A in the summer. I can easily see her quietly trying to drain blood from Sanders over the next month to stop him from getting a plurality of delegates.

I mean yes, Warren was the best candidate running and what you said is exactly why I liked her the most. But alas...
 

Allard

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,937
Has any candidate overcome a 100+ Delegate lead deficit?

Wasn't Clinton actually lead Obama after Super Tuesday? The big story was she was winning, but not by as much as she should and all the 'coming' states were awful for her which is why some at the time saw the writing on the wall.
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
My predictions from a few weeks ago are kinda halfsies. I guessed the same person wouldn't win both Iowa and NH and that Bernie would win NH. Which... sorta? Butti technically won Iowa. I also guessed Biden would win Nevada. Goose egg on that. South carolina was a gimme.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,336
wherever
From back in January:

My optimistic prediction is that Bernie wins Iowa and NH while Biden finishes 3rd/4th. Bernie takes Nevada as Biden's electability narrative falls apart and support shifts away from him. He likely still wins SC regardless but it's a much closer competition on Super Tuesday.

My pessimistic prediction is that Bernie loses Iowa, maybe wins New Hampshire, Biden gets Nevada and SC and effectively ends the race on Super Tuesday.

My optimistic prediction came pretty close to reality!
 

The Namekian

Member
Nov 5, 2017
4,893
New York City
I would hope not lol, what's the point of having a VP that is openly against your key policy proposal!

to get the nomination wrapped up...... then again this may have been a message in preparation for a brokered convention.
A true progressive queen. Lmao

I think I say this every couple of days she owes nothing to Bernie politically
Yep sounds like it




Maybe Kim will give Trump another nice big enveloped letter


Do we as a country even have the bandwidth to deal with this in the media? Like it feels like Kim saying don't forget about me........ also has NK been hit with covid 19 cause so has?
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,956
Nah, what he is trying to do is fracture the party. He's riling up Sanders voters so that if he doesn't get the nomination, all the Bernie supporters will stay home because they'll feel slighted.
And he also doesn't want to face Biden. They're not mutually exclusive.

Example #1000000 why no one likes de Blasio
de Blasio is less popular than Bloomberg amongst NYC Democrats. Lol, what a shit.
 

SSF1991

Member
Jun 19, 2018
3,263
New California poll.

It still has Pete in it, but part of it was done after the South Carolina primary:



#California @EmersonPolling/@NXSTMediaGroup Poll (2/29-3/1):
Sanders 38%
Biden 21%
Warren 16%
Bloomberg 11%
Buttigieg 7%
Klobuchar 5%
Steyer 2%
Gabbard 1%
emersonpolling.reportablenews.com

Emerson Polling

California 2020: Sanders Positioned to Capture California on Super Tuesday

Biden and Warren would be viable if this poll were to become the actual results.

But uh...damn Bernie's numbers are huge.
 

The Namekian

Member
Nov 5, 2017
4,893
New York City


Right now she is getting her "activist" on more than her politician role and honestly in a lot of ways AOC is doing political performance art. However, like I have said if they "rob" Bernie I think this wing of the party buckles down and starts campaigns where they can legit win. They don't need many house seats to make everybody miserable. Bernie's Street team working local elections with righteous would make things a lot more hectic.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,336
wherever

What are you on about.

My optimistic prediction is that Bernie wins Iowa and NH while Biden finishes 3rd/4th. Bernie takes Nevada as Biden's electability narrative falls apart and support shifts away from him. He likely still wins SC regardless but it's a much closer competition on Super Tuesday.

Bernie didn't technically win Iowa but everything else seems pretty close to what happened!
 

TorianElecdra

Member
Feb 25, 2020
2,520
New California poll.

It still has Pete in it, but part of it was done after the South Carolina primary:



#California @EmersonPolling/@NXSTMediaGroup Poll (2/29-3/1):
Sanders 38%
Biden 21%
Warren 16%
Bloomberg 11%
Buttigieg 7%
Klobuchar 5%
Steyer 2%
Gabbard 1%
emersonpolling.reportablenews.com

Emerson Polling

California 2020: Sanders Positioned to Capture California on Super Tuesday

Biden and Warren would be viable if this poll were to become the actual results.

But uh...damn Bernie's numbers are huge.


BEST POLLSTER of the primary will be correct again.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
Of voters who said that they decided on their vote just today, a majority (54%) have decided on Biden. Conversely, of voters who decided more than a month ago, a majority (53%) have chosen Sanders.

Ya, I think Biden definitely has momentum. And, like, 21% would be a really good result for Biden. If Bloomberg could either reach viability or crater further and give another 2-3 points to Biden that would be good. Obviously, viability is the bare minimum, but if he can hit the mid 20s that would be big for him, I think.
 

Uzuzu

Member
Nov 18, 2017
530
New California poll.

It still has Pete in it, but part of it was done after the South Carolina primary:



#California @EmersonPolling/@NXSTMediaGroup Poll (2/29-3/1):
Sanders 38%
Biden 21%
Warren 16%
Bloomberg 11%
Buttigieg 7%
Klobuchar 5%
Steyer 2%
Gabbard 1%
emersonpolling.reportablenews.com

Emerson Polling

California 2020: Sanders Positioned to Capture California on Super Tuesday

Biden and Warren would be viable if this poll were to become the actual results.

But uh...damn Bernie's numbers are huge.

I actually think only Bernie and Biden will be viable in california, probably similar numbers as SC but flipped. I think Warren's pitch to make it to the convention and "see what happen's" will turn off voters. I was for Bernie in 2016 in the primary but ended up voting for Clinton as it got closer to the convention and it was clear he wouldn't win without some undemocratic reliance on the party to choose him as the candidate. People don't like voting for losers.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
I'm disclaimaring this with SUPER SMALL SAMPLE SIZE DO NOT INFER ANYTHING OTHER THAN CONVERSATION

If you look at the crosstabs in that Emerson poll, it breaks it down by if folks have already voted vs. promising to vote.
Biden and Warren basically meet their overall topline numbers, that is 20.1% of people who have already voted voted for Biden (he's getting 21% in the poll) and 16.6% of people who have already voted voted for her (her topline is 16.1%)

Bernie is doing 4 points worse than his topline among people who have already voted....BUT the big one? Bloomberg. He's getting 10% in the topline...but only 6.5% of the early vote. I really think he's going to be a nonfactor overall.
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,666
Warren lost a lot of respect from me in the past few weeks. From the convention thing to the super PAC thing as well as the unity candidate call. Really not sure what's going on in her camp but it has been severely disappointing as have been her results. Feels like a younger Warren would have dropped out by now and endorsed another candidate. It's going to be a sad day when she loses in her own home state.

I want to see hungry "fuck Bloomberg" Warren, not "let's see what happens at the convention!" Warren.


It's worth noting that Bloomberg has NOT bought ads past Super Tuesday. I am hoping that he sees the writing on the wall and thinks that he is just flushing money down the toilet.


Crazy scenario for Warren winning the nomination:

*Bloomberg drops out, Warren starts to rack up delegates with Klob and Buttiegeg out.
*It is now a 3 person race between Bernie, Biden and Warren.
*Bernie suffers a heart attack and is forced to drop out of the race completely, endorses Warren as he steps down and pledges to give all of his delegates to her.
*Convention happens, Bernie + Warren has more delegates than Biden. Bernie Bros throw a hissy fit and demand that the progressive candidate be pushed over the top. Warren is declared the nominee and Obama comes out to endorse her.
 
Last edited:

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
14,771
Yeah, I do wonder if Warren fades hard before Tuesday.

And those Emerson numbers would be an insurmountable delegate haul for Bernie because of the CD numbers. There are only 144 statewide delegates. There are 271 CD delegates.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,336
wherever
Warren lost a lot of respect from me in the past few weeks. From the convention thing to the super PAC thing as well as the unity candidate call. Really not sure what's going on in her camp but it has been severely disappointing as have been her results. Feels like a younger Warren would have dropped out by now and endorsed another candidate. It's going to be a sad day when she loses in her own home state.

I want to see hungry "fuck Bloomberg" Warren, not "let's see what happens at the convention!" Warren.


It's worth noting that Bloomberg has NOT bought ads past Super Tuesday. I am hoping that he sees the writing on the wall and thinks that he is just flushing money down the toilet.

I'm just hoping if she loses MA that it'll be a wakeup call for Warren

Her convention strategy is moronic, this is quickly becoming a two person race so someone will get a majority or at least very close to it
 
Oct 25, 2017
13,147
The moderate lane is quickly consolidating. I hope to God Warren knows what to do. This go to the convention strategy is idiotic and a massive disservice to her staff.
 

Dr. Benton Quest

Resettlement Advisor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,377
Good lawd at those Cali numbers.

How does Sanders not run away with this whole thing by the time the convention rolls around?
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,666
So are we going to be adding up Bernie + Warren numbers vs Biden post Super Tuesday and do a progressive fusion or nah?
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
So are we going to be adding up Bernie + Warren numbers vs Biden post Super Tuesday and do a progressive fusion or nah?
I mean, that phase already happened long in the past. I mean you had people in previous versions of this thread making a case that Warren and Sanders could beat Biden's popular vote through a contested convention stacking on.
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,666
The moderate lane is quickly consolidating. I hope to God Warren knows what to do. This go to the convention strategy is idiotic and a massive disservice to her staff.
The only outcome I see is her trying to secure the white liberal vote delegates and do a last minute drop into endorsement for Sanders which could push him over the top. Pete and Klob dropping out helps her numbers quite a bit in northeastern states.
 

Teggy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,892
Teggy

Futures going higher can be attributed to hopes of coordinated Central Bank easing coming, also the expectation that the virus is seasonal means it's temporary (for this season), Apple said at the end of last week their Chinese production is almost back to normal, the CFR may be lower than initially suggested (see South Korea's stats), and the market has already fallen 15%.

thanks for the details
 
Status
Not open for further replies.