Luke Skywalker repeatedly tried to kill his father.Agreed.
Luke being shook enough at a moment's notice to pull his lightsaber and almost stab Han and Leia's kid, his nephew and student, in his sleep after we've all seen the lengths he went to first try to bring Vader, the man who caused countless hurt and deaths, back to the light side, is a bit unbelievable for many old SW fans.
It's ok that others think his actions during TLJ are justified. But it's also ok that some of us still feel Luke wouldn't react that way.
Looking back I'm probably viewing it from the perspective of having played the Shadow Broker dlc + romancing her where it all ties together better. I forgot that there's not a lot of context in the original base game. I know people who don't romance her have also felt like the game kind of 'forces' Liara on their Shepard at times and I've had to look at interactions with her differently because of that. I romance her every time so her loyalty to Shepard made sense in a way but I would imagine some of her actions come off as obsessive to a player who romanced someone else.Fair enough. But I think if you compare Liara with the other squadmates from ME1 you can notice a big difference. Wrex becoming more involved with the Krogans make sense, Garrus becoming a sort of vigilante makes sense, Tali becoming more involved with the Quarians (and the Geth) make sense. No one would have guessed Liara would have gone from a naive archeologist to a hardened information broker. Simply being on the Normandy for a while for don't come close to justify as I see it.
And about the Asari, I can see where your comment is coming from. I might be mistaken but as I remember it an Asari life is divided in three stages of roughly 300 years each. In the first they are very exploratory and adventurous. They are more family oriented in the second stage and in the third they are matriarchs. I always got the feeling change in an Asari life is a slow process (hence the "stable" in my previous post), which is the opposite of the Salarians. Which is one more reason why I think Liara development is in fact not a development, but a rupture.
Not really. Rey almost gives into the darkside multiple times in Episode 8. The difference is Episode 9 makes it less subtle.Rey in TROS is a completely different character who wnt from being able to resist the darkside consistently to being constantly prone to it in order to justify the worst plot twist of the film. Also, Finn, also Poe. The film starts by completely ignoring the new equilibriums established at the end of the last film.
That's fair. I am fine with calling it a "figuring out the character" as opposed to a full on rewrite. I mean, she didn't start as Lisa Simpson then become Homer or anything.I have some reservations about Sweet Dee. The observation that she was written differently in S1 is a perfect and correct one, and there was indeed changes to how the character was written in S2. But even ignoring the fact that the first season of Sunny is experimental in many ways (there are many plot points that are dropped and/or retconned) I'd argue Dee was already quite unhinged in the first season.
Sure there were moments you could totally see that voice of reason part that she had to play, but you could also see the "real" Dee a lot. Her mortal disgust of old people for example, her drunkness, the intervention she and Dennis do on Charlie... I mean, in the Gun Fever episode she has a more moderate attitude about gun control and in the end of the episode is screaming for Dennis to shoot Charlie in the face.
I see it more as "ironing out the creases" than a rewriting.
2 aside, to me 1 + 3-5 are pretty much in line, especially since he goes from 19 to 40 with things happening.Devil May Cry the thread
Dante (DMC1): Bad ass pre-uncle
Dante (DMC2): Anti-Social soulless expression extraordinaire
Dante (DMC3): Punk rock band member
Oh yeah. I forgot about this series and hearing about that a few times. I never manged to finish it. It got to a point where it felt like it was dragging on in what I believe was the last arc. Started and ditched the sequel series as well.
Sounds like a pretty messy ending. They didn't really ever specify the person who he ended up with did they? I think his granddaughter was there at some point near the start but never specified who her ancestor was aside from Negi. Wait, so is UQ holder sort of like a continuation in a different timeline?yeah, the magical world arc was insanely long and had like a dozen sub arcs.
what followed was very rushed and you ended up with several cut arcs that were to follow as the author was trying to beat the implement of some new law that was anti ettchi/lolicon/etc.
Result was you had a sudden time skip and then that was it, no real ending. We didn't get a canon ending until several years later when UQ holder had it as a recap of what happened in the "asuna returns" timeline that's canon to negima, rather then the "asuna sleeps" timeline that UQ holder is based off.
She doesn't give in at all, that's the red herring is that she gets exposed to it but it has nothing to offer her. She's the polar opposite of Luke in that regard.Not really. Rey almost gives into the darkside multiple times in Episode 8. The difference is Episode 9 makes it less subtle.
What's frustrating is that Bakugo never gets much better. They simply reveal more to show why he's an asshole....but he's still an asshole.
Once Luke found out Vader was his dad, he tried to kill him repeatedly? We watched very different movies then. Because I remember him surrendering himself, repeatedly trying NOT to fight him even in the throne room, only snapping when his sister was mentioned, and still threw his own lightsaber to the side.Luke Skywalker repeatedly tried to kill his father.
I think what it really comes down to is that some people were expecting a deified version of Luke Skywalker for the sequel trilogy. That after the character's initial struggle in the OT, they would have overcome their flaws completely and become a paragon type figure.
Instead, the ST fully rejected that entirely. Not only keeping Luke's flaws and inner conflicts, but pushing them to the furthest possible extreme. Resulting in probably the most challenging story you could ever really tell with the character.
But it is still Luke's flaws. Luke's inner conflicts. While I can understand those who felt TLJ went too far, I think it's very hard to really argue it isn't ultimately in character. Not without ignoring large chunks of Luke's character in the OT.
I agree but -abandons ship-
It's not hugely uncommon for a Doctor's personality to evolve over time, just noticeable quite how stark Twelfth's is.Capaldi was my first Doctor in the new series. I did not realize that this was not normal.
TO be fair ,the manga does point that out so its canon in the story that he becomes a bit more lightheartedJoJo part 3, Avdol starts as a stoic badass. The comes back as a goofy catchphrase guy. Then hes just there to react to the shit everyone else does for the rest of the show.
Luke Skywalker repeatedly tried to kill his father.
I think what it really comes down to is that some people were expecting a deified version of Luke Skywalker for the sequel trilogy. That after the character's initial struggle in the OT, they would have overcome their flaws completely and become a paragon type figure.
Instead, the ST fully rejected that entirely. Not only keeping Luke's flaws and inner conflicts, but pushing them to the furthest possible extreme. Resulting in probably the most challenging story you could ever really tell with the character.
But it is still Luke's flaws. Luke's inner conflicts. While I can understand those who felt TLJ went too far, I think it's very hard to really argue it isn't ultimately in character. Not without ignoring large chunks of Luke's character in the OT.
Lol smart move around apparently
Once Luke found out Vader was his dad, he tried to kill him repeatedly? We watched very different movies then. Because I remember him surrendering himself, repeatedly trying NOT to fight him even in the throne room, only snapping when his sister was mentioned, and still threw his own lightsaber to the side.
edit: He kept saying felt the good within him. Luke crazy, but he was right in the end.
Sounds like a pretty messy ending. They didn't really ever specify the person who he ended up with did they? I think his granddaughter was there at some point near the start but never specified who her ancestor was aside from Negi. Wait, so is UQ holder sort of like a continuation in a different timeline?
Awesome! Thanks for the informationyes, UQ holder states whom Negi finally ended up with who was pretty obvious from Negima's final few Chapters.
UQ holder is a direct sequel to one of the timelines established in Negima, that is the one where Asuna went to sleep for like 100 years and thus wasn't available for the fight against the mage of the beginning.
Chao had sent her back in time to when she went to sleep, allowing Asuna to effect the final battle in a new timeline. That's the one that's canon for negima.
In between snapping at the mention of his sister and throwing away his weapon, Luke tries to kill his father multiple times.Once Luke found out Vader was his dad, he tried to kill him repeatedly? We watched very different movies then. Because I remember him surrendering himself, repeatedly trying NOT to fight him even in the throne room, only snapping when his sister was mentioned, and still threw his own lightsaber to the side.
edit: He kept saying felt the good within him. Luke crazy, but he was right in the end.
Yeah, it's a perfectly natural throughline.Luke is impulsive, especially when it comes to his loved ones.
In RotJ, at the mere mention of his sister, he goes absolutely nuts and wrecks Vader's shit before coming to his senses and stopping himself from killing him.
In TLJ, caught up in a vision of a future in which Kylo Ren kills all the loved ones, Luke pulls out his lightsaber before coming to his senses and stopping himself from killing him.
Seems pretty consistent to me.
Strictly speaking these are different people (because they're from completely different historical eras!), but they're intended to be the same characters, if that makes sense.
In "The Black Adder":
Prince Edmund is largely an easily-manipulated fool.
Baldrick, his squire, is an intelligent schemer
In "Blackadder II", "Blackadder The Third" and "Blackadder Goes Forth" (along with sundry one-offs):
Lord Blackadder/ Mr E. Blackadder, Butler to the Prince Regent / Captain Blackadder is an intelligent schemer.
Baldrick / Baldrick / Private Baldrick is an easily-manipulated fool.
After the first series, the characters changed personalities. Their stations were always the same relative to one another, Edmund the superior, Baldrick the inferior, but the personalities completely flipped. Baldrick's trademarked "cunning plans" were actually reasonably effective in The Black Adder, but got increasingly ill-judged in later series.
Not unrelatedly, the series really hit the ground running from the second series onwards, with the first series seeming like a weird outlier. Interestingly the pilot, however, has smart Edmund / foolish Baldrick as we are used to from the later series - they got it right the very first time!
Cool interpretation, but that's not how it read to me.She doesn't give in at all, that's the red herring is that she gets exposed to it but it has nothing to offer her. She's the polar opposite of Luke in that regard.
Definitely Cordelia on Angel season 4.
Cordelia from Angel, even though they tried to make sense of the personality change, it still doesn't make sense, but we all know why now she had been written off so poorly like that.
Obligatory, fuck Joss Whedon that piece of shit of a human being.
What isn't consistent is the circumstances?Luke is impulsive, especially when it comes to his loved ones.
In RotJ, at the mere mention of his sister, he goes absolutely nuts and wrecks Vader's shit before coming to his senses and stopping himself from killing him.
In TLJ, caught up in a vision of a future in which Kylo Ren kills all the loved ones, Luke pulls out his lightsaber before coming to his senses and stopping himself from killing him.
Seems pretty consistent to me.
Ehhhh, that sounds kind of iffy right there. I guess you can count each strike in that short fight as a murder attempt. But usually in a fight, a person doesn't count each punch in a fight as getting beat up multiple times. You'd say they just got beat up. But whatever. We agree to disagree :)In between snapping at the mention of his sister and throwing away his weapon, Luke tries to kill his father multiple times.
Tim Roths character in Lie to Me. I forget if it happened in the second or third season. He just turned into an aggressive unlikable dick.
Yeah I was super upset because season 1 showed such great promise.Yeah I just finished watching all 3 seasons and he really became a prick after season one. But the whole show kind of changed after season one, which was a big shame.
Dr. Catherine Halsey in the Halo books written by Eric Nylund compared to those by Karen Traviss.
Dr. Halsey started as a complex tormented genius who shared an authentic motherly relationship with the soldiers she caused to be kidnapped and brutally conditioned as children. She was an interesting figure: a gifted scientist who juxtaposed extreme ambition and cruel and unethical actions with unsparing self-awareness and a powerful current of sympathy for her own human products. She saved humanity by accident, at a terrible cost, and then was driven by fierce loyalty and a crisis of conscience to preserve the lives of her remaining "children."
Then, in the space of one book, Traviss turned Dr. Halsey into a cold, twisted, delusional war criminal who was compared by name to Josef Mengele, relentlessly punished and degraded, and in effect reduced to all of the ugliest aspects of her character. Readers were subjected to extreme tonal whiplash, as a character who used to have a complicated inner life -- serving as a window into the themes and conflicts that make the extended Halo universe so rich -- was almost literally turned into a punching bag over a series of rancorous chapters.
I have heard the explanation that Traviss's books merely show Dr. Halsey from the outside POV of people who have a poor view of her. But the books make a strong point of scapegoating her for sins shared by all of her enablers, and the entire Office of Naval Intelligence, which was responsible for countless other dark operations that Dr. Halsey had little to do with. It seems inconsistent to write her in this way, when some of her contemporaries are written with a much warmer tone, even when they've built careers out of doing monstrous things with less compelling justifications than Dr. Halsey had.
Fortunately Dr. Halsey's characterization was very slightly improved in Halo 5. I wonder if that carried through in the newer books. I hope it does in Halo Infinite.