Remeniscient of those old chinese knockoff MacBooks from the aughts.
I'm not even an Apple fanboy, but the problem when copying or closely replicating Apple's signature design style is when you make small alterations or take liberties to get a specific feature onto it, it ends up looking worse than if you designed something yourself without a lot of "influence" and didn't try to hamfist those requirements into the design. It doesn't look "premium" it makes it look cheap and worse than it would have if you didnt try to to design something very close to Apple's design standard.
Like this button, either a power button, finger print reader, or something:
It looks bad, it looks out of place, it's a thin metal something when nothing else follows that pattern. You've got this smooth metal frame and then just... this oddly place thing in the middle of it. It looks worse than if you didn't try to replicate thee rest of the design and designed around this requirement.
Same thing with the huge bottom bezel, the weird blue button, and anything else. I'm sure the bezel is there because it's a big computer but the screen size is set to some specific aspect ratio, so to make everything line up they just make the bezel huge, but it looks weird, it looks like a mistake. THe blue button is probably Samsung's BIXBY button, or something, so they make this really consistently designed keyboard but then have this out of place weird blue button that is probably there just because some exec is like "How can we advertise our redundant, virtually-gauranteed-to-be-forgotten-and-replaced virtual assistant on all of our hardware?" Same with, IMO, the off-center track pad. I know the track pad is off center to line it up with the qwerty section of the keyboard, but there's a real Apple doesn't put numberpads on their keyboards, because you have to make design compromises to do it and it
looks bad. Even if you get functionality by having a numberpad there, they make the decision that design symmetry or typing balance is better than the benefit of having redundant keys.
There's nothing really wrong with imitating something that has a signature, iconic design. It happens a lot. BUt if you're not that iconic designer, then the affordances you make end up making your product look worse than if you didn't try to capture that signature design. For instance, when Hyundai and Kia made those cars that looked a lot like a Jaguar S-type, a lot of people would see it and be like "... is that a jaguar...?" But then you'd look closer and realize, no, a budget Korean car trying to look a Jaguar, and it'd look worse than when Hyundai or Kia just designed their own cars.
IT's like "Ok... let's take the tapering shape of the Jaguar, the grill, the general design of the lights, the sculpted hood, ... oh, but we also need those shitty fog lamps... and we need a space for bumpers and we gotta get as much air into the engine as possible to keep it cool on a budget ... we're only paying our designers $9,000 year... so... MAKE IT WORK PEOPLE."