-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Resident Evil 3 Review Thread
- Thread starter Dusk Golem
- Start date
I'd still like to see an RE4 remake on the RE engine. Nobody's taking away your ability to play the original on GameCube, Wii, PS2, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One, and PC.
I suspected as much when they merged the concept of the boss into the Gammas.
I don't mind knowing this because at least now I won't be disappointed when I go through the whole game and he never shows up.
Remakes tend to become the "real" version of a game bar some exceptions. I'd rather not let RE4 be tainted by a game trying to ruin it for "realism."
RE4 is not going to be ruined retroactively because of a remake.
Lmao they gonna go back and change RE4's source code in every version if they remake it?
I would like to put as a "definite experience", unfortunately it seems this is not the case here.
Yeah, my school had the internet in the library around the same time. It was only ~2 computers and we never used them.
CAPCOM isn't going to be like Blizzard and replace RE4 with REmake 4.
The negatives I'm reading don't seem huge to me. Its length is on par with other RE games, and it doesn't have two campaigns... which it never did.
Overall, the reviews are good, but I haven't read a review where I feel the reviewer justified a particularly low score. They read more like these reviewers never play average or even bad games, and stick strictly to the big budget AAA scene.
Overall, the reviews are good, but I haven't read a review where I feel the reviewer justified a particularly low score. They read more like these reviewers never play average or even bad games, and stick strictly to the big budget AAA scene.
Not what I said but ok.
I mean in terms of what is regarded as the main and most important one. Like if there's any future reference the remake would be what's considered "canon."
I fully admit it's my own hang up but I don't want to see an RE4 that's trying to be "realistic and serious."
Thanks for the answer. Will see by myself how it plays out when it releases.
Yeah... I was just commenting from a post a few posts up from my original that made a bullet-point list of things that seemingly didn't make it. That's the one main thing that stuck out to me. To be honest I'm glad I know now so I won't be disappointed this weekend.
We still begging capcom for Vergil, they'll probably give resistance one update and bounce.
It all started when they dressed Nemesis in stitched up trash bags. Shame they couldn't nail the dynamic nature of the Nemesis encounters, I was thinking they had good shot of topping even RE2 Remake. Even so, can't wait to play though it myself and Resistance has been a blast.
did you preorder from amazon? When did you get the preorder code?
Was it really dynamic? From what i remember on ps1, it was also scripted. Just well placed and more frequent.
Should have really done something like Outbreak rather than the cheap Dead by Daylight type knockoff, but Capcom gonna Capcpom.
Saw tons of youtubers saying that it was dynamic back in the days and downgraded the remake because of that...
See:
That's a better way to put it, but the first time playing the original, Nemesis felt like like a constant unpredictable threat, especially since he was so frequently optional to fight. Sounds like in the remake you face him more often in a closed boss fight environment.
It's not "cursed." The original RE3 was a good game that wasn't as good as RE2. The same seems to apply to the remake.
Was watching Eurogamer and they said
are cut and now I'm upset. I was already kind of upset about the short play time, but I was hoping to see those realized in the RE engine. I thought they were confirmed to be in. I'm a huge RE/horror fan, but I'm tempted to cancel for now. =/
spiders
I mean aside from 4 and 6 the whole series is short and 4 on a second run is not that long once you know what to do. The whole series is 8 hours or less aside from two games
These reviews are very disappointing for me since i have a fond spot for the original RE3, it's probably gonna be a good game but expectations were very high since the RE2 remake was pretty good. With all the mentions of iconic places being cut from the original ,nemesis not being an ever present threat focus and showing in scripted moments, this RE3 remake is definitely not day 1 material. Will buy it eventually. though.
Don't want to add to the hyperbole, but just like RE2 remake... these are short games that are an enjoyable session or two. Always an easy purchase once they hit 50% off.
When a hyped up AAA game gets below a 90 on Metacritic, people react with hyperbole.
The fact is that the game has gotten largely good reviews with some great reviews and a couple poor reviews.
How long is 5? Isn't 5 almost as long as 4? But yeah, people are complaining a lot about length when the majority of the series is extremely short, intentionally. It isn't till 4 when that changed a bit and then 7 went back to being like 2 hours once you know where everything is. It's nothing new so I'm confused.
I am a bit shocked to see so many people canceling pre-orders. Namely because I've consistently seen the game for 10-20% off when pre-ordering. Seeing the game for such a lower price even before release tells me that capcom knew people would be upset with length and vent about the time to price ratio