Oh my bad, I was referring to RE8 on my answer. Will edit it to make it clear. Thanks!
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Resident Evil 3 Review Thread
- Thread starter Dusk Golem
- Start date
It's pretty much the expected scenario. Not sure why people are losing it.
Hope RE8 is in FPP though, it seems a breather from tpp wouldn't be a bad thing.
That dlc content was pretty good. Hope we get something like it.
Thanks, really hope Capcom gets on that asapOne of the reviews says the Xbox One X version is rough so it doesn't seem so.
EDIT:
Resident Evil 3 Remake review: Are we ready for pandemic nostalgia?
One year after RE2's remake, Capcom is back—but talk about some awkward timing.arstechnica.com
"Playing on Xbox One X? Wait for a patch."
So it seems like for fans of RE2 Remake that haven't played RE3 this will be a good ride? Many of the criticisms seem to be that it 3 Remake doesn't include all areas or enemies from the original. I think that's fine?
Here is Gameblog's Review, written by yours truly: http://www.gameblog.fr/tests/3635-resident-evil-3-ps4
7/10
7/10
Still day1. Doesn't turn me off at all.
In the last years I have seen a growing shift between me and some reviewers anyways. Some games I thought didn't deserve an 98 got one and some games that deserved a better score only got a 65-75~.
In the end it is about personal taste and it is impossible to let anyone but me speak for it.
(Also higher than 80+ is not bad at all)
In the last years I have seen a growing shift between me and some reviewers anyways. Some games I thought didn't deserve an 98 got one and some games that deserved a better score only got a 65-75~.
In the end it is about personal taste and it is impossible to let anyone but me speak for it.
(Also higher than 80+ is not bad at all)
For the people that are saying it's too short. How long do you guys think the original was?
Like, please. It's perfectly fine.
They cut at least 2 sectors and promised bigger and more explorable Raccoon City, so it's not hard to imagine people expecting it to be longer.
btw. After I saw Carlos' haymaker instead of dodge, I got even saltier that there's no scenario B as him.
The lengths? I read the review and was hit with what I would consider a logical inconsistency right away. For me that calls in to question whether I take the review seriously or not.
If a review is bad but at least well argued then that's cool. In the end I'll make my own mind up on what's good or bad. RE6 was hated and I liked it. Doom Eternal was loved and there are elements in that game I hate. It's like...options and shit.
The original reviewed great. It had 91 ratings on gamerankings at that time
This.
I adored RE2make, but, it was definitely much more of a standard remake than REmake was. Didn't change that much ultimately.
REmake is in a league of it's own. Updating the game with modern graphics and adding genuine twists and surprises that still felt true to the original. That's what these *should* be.
This is where I'm at as well. Mr. X in the original RE2 was a neat idea that the Nemesis perfected in RE3. How RE2R reimagined Mr. X made the potential for Nemesis to have that same level of perfect concept held amazing potential. From reviews it sounds like the people who made RE3R didn't play RE2R and get why Mr. X worked so well in that title, and instead focused on how Nemesis worked in vanilla RE3 and drew inspiration from that.
I don't think many people will agree but i'm here for it, RE7 was perfect.
Still hyped and day 1 because it's my favorite series of all time and I'm a mega fan. That being said, like RE2R, I feel this could have been so much better. Lack of content, cut or not is holding these remakes back from toppling RE4 for me. REmake 1 continues to be the gold standard on how to reimagine a game. RE2R cut so much content that they could have made the 2 campaigns much more unique and RE3R should have been more open on the level of Dark Souls to give us that meaty single player experience.
That Gamexplain review really went to town on the limited content. Apparently the only outdoors city sections are what we say in the demo, and the RPD is a truncated version of what we saw in RE2.
I don't mind Nemesis not stalking you throughout like Mr X as I'm ok with him being a boss character.
They should release an RE2/3 pack at the end of the year. And when they do RE4 remake, they had BETTER not leave anything out from that game.
I don't mind Nemesis not stalking you throughout like Mr X as I'm ok with him being a boss character.
They should release an RE2/3 pack at the end of the year. And when they do RE4 remake, they had BETTER not leave anything out from that game.
Hmm, well it's settled at 80, which is honestly better than I expected after some of the reviews I saw that just dropped. Still definitely picking it up at some point this year, just not day one like I did REmake 2.
People would have been hyped for a low 80s Resident Evil remake a few years ago. Expectations with Capcom's other recent games have gotten crazy.
Nemesis coming into scene via cutscenes. That's been my biggest concern ever since the early preview stuff came out and it looks like I was on the money. smh
Obviously, I'll let my playthrough of the game decide it for me, but this was deflating. I'm officially on the "Capcom let's move the god damn story along" train with RE8
It seems like the remake of 3 stays true to the original in the action department at least so for some this will be the best of the remake trilogy too
Michael Huber of EZA said the first playthrough was 5-6 hours.
Wait to play the new Sewers before you write them off! They're one of the best parts of the new game -- the new Hunter Gammas are super freaky.
As for the Clock tower -- without spoiling anything, a lot of stuff from that sequence have been picked out and added to other parts of the game. There's a lot of "remixing" in the game. I won't pretend the Clock Tower being cut doesn't hurt a bit, but it doesn't feel like there's a gaping hole in the plot or anything.
As for the Clock tower -- without spoiling anything, a lot of stuff from that sequence have been picked out and added to other parts of the game. There's a lot of "remixing" in the game. I won't pretend the Clock Tower being cut doesn't hurt a bit, but it doesn't feel like there's a gaping hole in the plot or anything.
Yeah that's not a bad thing at all. Knowing me it'll take me 10 hours since Claire's campaign in RE2 Remake took me that long my first time while I saw others completing it in 6 hours. What worries me though is that a common complaint is the campaign feels pretty scattershot.
that remains to be seen. A critic isn't exactly gonna go in and replay the game 8 or 9 times for, and with, unlockables. At least, I wouldn't expect them too.
I really don't think it's bad at all. It's in no way shape or form a mess. I adored my hardcore playthrough of it and yes, it feel rushed and some thing have obviously been cut but what is there is absolutely incredible.
It went from a 92 meta to an 80. I expected a step down in terms of response, but 12 points is pretty staggering.
As someone who's never played RE3, cutting areas out of the game is pretty weird and I would rather they just delay it.
Damn what the hell does Capcom have against them? That's twice now.
You called into question whether they had played the original when they said they believed RE3 was inferior to its predecessor even in 1999 because you didn't agree with their statement. Why call their integrity into question?
Honestly I blame games media for that. They rarely use the full scale and because of that, low 80's/ 70s are regarded as low 70's 60s for AAA games. If reviewers were "harsher" across the board, an 80 wouldn't be seen as bad
What does this mean "it went from", it's two different games we're talking about here one is not an extension of the other.
It was just OK-ish, I thought. No cutscenes, no voice acting, recycled locations from the main game, and no playable Marvin. Super low budget content update. Makes sense because it was free, I guess, but I really would have preferred paid DLC if it meant we could've gotten something better (like, an Ada scenario would've been sick).
I don't know what to expect for RE3, in the way of content updates. If I remember correctly, The Ghost Survivors was unveiled around this time pre-launch, if not earlier, and there's been no RE3 equivalent posted to Capcom's social media so far. I really do think they were counting on Resistance to make the entire package "whole".