The simplist solution is to make the RTS Warcraft story self-contained. That way, that development team won't be stepping on anyone's toes from any current (or future) Warcraft expansion.
Wouldn't it just be easier to update the existing game? As mentioned before, it just feels too soon (by Blizzard standards) for a full-on Overwatch 2.Overwatch 2. With a good, short story mode and some permanent co-op PVE mode (more fleshed out horde mode like some of the special events).
Definitely Warcraft 4, although without bastardizing the custom games system as they did in Starcraft 2.
Unless they find some ways to shake up the RTS genre, that's gonna be a no from me, dawgs.
Wouldn't it just be easier to update the existing game? As mentioned before, it just feels too soon (by Blizzard standards) for a full-on Overwatch 2.
Same. It's kinda sad that the only game to look forward to from them is an 13 year old game..Classic is the only thing I care about coming out of blizzard and if they fuck it up in any capacity I'm done with them.
...In order of preference.
Diablo reboot
Diablo 2 Remake ala RE2 Remake
Diablo 4
Warcraft 4
Starcraft Ghost
Please Blizzard
Same. It's kinda sad that the only game to look forward to from them is an 13 year old game..
Classic is the only thing I care about coming out of blizzard and if they fuck it up in any capacity I'm done with them.
Warcraft 3 Reforged?Only game I look forward to from Blizzard is 16 years old. Beat that.
It seems like for better or worse (or more accurately better and worse) classic is going to be as close as possible to a direct copy of the game pre-Burning Crusade. If that's what you are looking for, you shouldn't be disappointed.
Yea ive been following the game, i played the demo, everything sounds good so far but we'll see how things develop a year after its release. It wouldn't surprise me if they tried to implement things like levels boots and character transfers to retail etc. despite them saying they have no plans to go this route. It all depends on how successful/unsuccessful it is and the pressures from activision that could result from that.
I don't even think they should make Diablo 4. I don't think they could make a better Diablo than 2. Just remaster 2.
Why is it too soon? It released 3 years ago. It would be in development for a few years. So you're saying that 5 years in between games is too soon?I can kinda see something along the lines of a massive update, but it's WAY too soon for a straight-up Overwatch sequel.
For a Blizzard game, yeah. They're known to continually update their games for years. I'd personally save Overwatch 2 for when we're well into the next console generation at the earliest. And even then, Blizzard could get away with just updating Overwatch for even longer.Why is it too soon? It released 3 years ago. It would be in development for a few years. So you're saying that 5 years in between games is too soon?