Men are not negatively impacted by sexualized designs of women and I don't see how you could even bring it up as if they are. Even your examples go over everything negative women experience but don't touch on a single issue men face from it.I don't believe this one bit. Sexualization of female characters in media has detrimental effects on both women and men. While I acknowledge women are in the receiving end for the ridicule, impossible standards, and negative stereotypes; it's an issue I firmly believe men also need to take stand on as well to make a real difference.
You have to stop looking at my posts outlining the flaws I see in yours or anyone's justifications of Jill's design as a means for me to police the way they should think. I'm not trying to convert or strong-arm you or anyone into my way of thinking or anything. I'm in an online discussion board pointing out how I feel and discern the things being pointed out. I disagreed with your claim that the game provided a good enough context for Jill's attire and you responded and we went back and forth.
And finally, just because I labelled Capcom's design decision to dress Jill that way for RE3 as sexist trash doesn't mean the other even more reprehensible designs out there will be spared from the criticism. You're free to go through my post history where I voice my opinion on those designs as well if you felt I'm unfairly targeting RE3.
Fuck the objectified trash from RE3 and retcon it for the remake.
I didn't do this on purpose, I swear! :P Instead of trying to use the RE3 CG render, I was trying to use the REmake version of it so that people would see it at its best. I really didn't realize this was a fan render, I'll get a better one! Sorry for the lateness of it, but hey, better late than never!I suspect OP used official renders for all but RE3, in which he used an out of proportion fan render because he knew it would otherwise win. ;)
I didn't do this on purpose, I swear! :P Instead of trying to use the RE3 CG render, I was trying to use the REmake version of it so that people would see it at its best. I really didn't realize this was a fan render, I'll get a better one! Sorry for the lateness of it, but hey, better late than never!
For the record, I adore almost all of Jill's outfits. But there is definitely one I think of as the defining outfit. I won't reveal it yet since I don't want to influence the polling. :)
My problem with Jill besides her STARS uniform is they give her a decent costume but then you see the concept were more interesting.
they chose the left
They chose
Every headgear and hairstyle in the concept art is far better than the final design.
Honestly that Revelations Concept Jill could have tied the STARS uniform for me.
I really want that beret w/headphones or bandana w/headphones design in the next Jill game.
Only thing I've seen of 5's isDo we have that for RE5?
I think her BSAA outfit to be outstanding.
STARS uniform with beret from REmake will always be Best Jill.
I don't know if it's just me, but I feel like the cap bring the whole look together.It's my favorite as well, but without the cap.
Although if we consider alternate outfits then my favorite would be this one from RE3:
Here is a study done showcasing the effects of objectified content to male brains. I already said in the previous post women face more of the issues I didn't deny it. But I'm not going to dismiss the negative impacts it has on men as well.Men are not negatively impacted by sexualized designs of women and I don't see how you could even bring it up as if they are. Even your examples go over everything negative women experience but don't touch on a single issue men face from it.
I never once claimed you or any other group of people have to agree with me. Merely making a rebuttal at comment you made does not mean I'm forcing you to agree with me.Should men speak out against problematic designs? Yes but this does not mean any time you criticize or label something problematic that women are going to agree with you and even if you don't like hearing it topics regarding sexualization is mainly about our feelings considering the way it impacts us.
Neither do I. A sexualized design is fine as well for me as long as it has relevance and context.Not all of us view sexualized designs as inherently bad but because there is such an imbalance that impacts us we are more critical of how they are designed and presented.
And like I said earlier, just because it doesn't go as bad as a game like Dead or Alive with creepy angle shots and compromising positions doesn't exempt it from criticism. I've already said I'm basing my judgement of Capcom's justification of the design based on what they've presented. And from the prologue screenshots they have presented Jill as intentionally leaving to escape her predicament in that outfit.So again, Jill's outfit is impractical and definitely designed with fanservice in mind but I don't mind because it is still a normal outfit and for me is justified by the story which is a zombie apocalypse and has a massive tyrant hunting her. The game never goes out of it's way to put her in compromising positions or gross poses.
What exactly do you find about my statements that is pushing? You're making rebuttals to my arguments the same way, if you're going to accuse me of something how am I any different from you then? Also, wearing an attire is substantially longer than putting shoes on? Have you ever seen the movie Terminator? Do you remember the scene when Kyle Reese is running from the cops? It takes less than 15 seconds for him to put an attire on himself:The only reason these chain of responses happened is because you thought it was outrageous that she had time to put boots on which takes like 10 seconds meanwhile an outfit change for practical reasons would have taken much longer and this continued because we started disagreeing with story justification. You can feel the design is problematic without pushing that onto people who don't. Saying people are making up scenarios which no one has done because you don't personally feel a zombie apocalypse means there is urgency is dismissive.
It's not asking which you prefer, it's asking which is the most iconic, which tends to mean what most people would recognize. You could put any number of characters in the STARS outfit, because its a uniform and forgettable whereas the "tubetop" is definitively her thing.
Women face pretty much 95% of the issues that come from sexualization. One example that only impacts a mans brain and not how they are treated or perceived is not valid enough for me to agree with bringing them up as being able to talk over women on what is or isn't sexist.Here is a study done showcasing the effects of objectified content to male brains. I already said in the previous post women face more of the issues I didn't deny it. But I'm not going to dismiss the negative impacts it has on men as well.
You are incredibly dismissive and aggressive about people who like or defend the design. Stop acting as if you accept other people who don't find it problematic.I never once claimed you or any other group of people have to agree with me. Merely making a rebuttal at comment you made does not mean I'm forcing you to agree with me.
It's about the caliber of response I expect from people that defend that excuse for a character design.
Of course the design can be criticized but that doesn't mean all criticisms are true or bad. You took something from the opening that I and others didn't. An infection spreading quickly and her discussing her last escape is a sign to me this is urgent to her but I also can look past the fact that RE has horribly cheesy writing and opened with a shot to look cool rather than express the urgency that is evident from the setting. I also think that scene isn't completely unlikely. For arguments sake, she sat down to put her boots on quickly and then loaded her gun or she had her ammo stashed under the bed and loaded it while sitting down. Her sitting down doesn't make it impossible to be urgent in a situation but I can agree it's not the best way to depict urgency.Neither do I. A sexualized design is fine as well for me as long as it has relevance and context.
And like I said earlier, just because it doesn't go as bad as a game like Dead or Alive with creepy angle shots and compromising positions doesn't exempt it from criticism. I've already said I'm basing my judgement of Capcom's justification of the design based on what they've presented. And from the prologue screenshots they have presented Jill as intentionally leaving to escape her predicament in that outfit.
What?What exactly do you find about my statements that is pushing? You're making rebuttals to my arguments the same way, if you're going to accuse me of something how am I any different from you then? Also, wearing an attire is substantially longer than putting shoes on? Have you ever seen the movie Terminator? Do you remember the scene when Kyle Reese is running from the cops? It takes less than 15 seconds for him to put an attire on himself:
I fail to see why it would take so much longer for Jill.
Why? Because you think the costume is tasteless or because you think the STARS one is more popular? I think both reasonings are debatable.
A game which is widely considered a minor entry in the series.
It's not asking which you prefer, it's asking which is the most iconic, which tends to mean what most people would recognize. You could put any number of characters in the STARS outfit, because its a uniform and forgettable whereas the "tubetop" is definitively her thing.
I think of Jill I think of the tube top. And this is despite the fact I've never even played RE3. Obviously a lot of other people agree.The iconic Jill Valentine is a badass with a beret, not that look that screams "I'm a tenth grader in 1994 just a few minutes away from putting in my butterfly clips."
The tube top is ridiculous. Someone remind me if they explain why she's wearing that in the game. Do the zombies invade Raccoon City while she's out shopping at the mall with her gal pals? I guess that'd make sense. Please don't tell me that's her new uniform or something...
I'm not looking at it from a sexuality angle myself, just a practicality one, and I believe Jill looks plain silly in that outfit. It would not fit the more grounded, gritty tone that REmake 2 ran with (that will very likely persist into REmake 3). I love Sheva and Sherry's fanservice outfits from 5 and 6, so it ain't got nothing to do with being prudish. It's just a somewhat goofy outfit for Jill to be wearing, considering the circumstances. Leon and Claire got huge upgrades to their classic looks, in my eyes, so I'm sure Jill will get the same treatment.Yes while she is wearing those clothes zombies had in fact invaded the city. The mansion incident was in July and RE3 takes place in September. Nothing had happened till then with them probably assuming the incident in the Arklay mountains was end of it.
I hope they keep this outfit in 3's remake just to hear people like you complain. Sounds rather prudish to me.