Borderline 2 minutes. Softest major in the history of playoff hockey.
You sure about that?
Borderline 2 minutes. Softest major in the history of playoff hockey.
You sound like the NHL department of player safety. You're supposed to penalize the play, not the results. Not that it ever happens that way.
The results were disastrous but the play was not a 5 minute major.
Yea that cross-check was unnecessary but hardly vicious
Can't believe that decided the series
Ok everyone that whole game was unreal and we'll remember it forever but let's not lose sight of the the biggest news of the day in hockey, this tweet:
That didn't decide the series, the Vegas shitty pk did.Yea that cross-check was unnecessary but hardly vicious
Can't believe that decided the series
THANK YOU!The penalty was too harsh for the infraction, I agree, but that loss is all on Vegas. Even if you get a 5 minute major, there's no way that you should allow 4 straight goals within a span of 4 minutes. And Vegas had a chance to win it in OT but didn't.
That's not even mentioning the fact that they had a 3-1 series lead that they gave up.
Jones played his ass off after everyone gave up on him. Credit to PDB for sticking with him.
Sharks are so banged up right now. We have, what, 3 actually healthy NHL defensemen right now?
I dont think anyone is saying the penalty cost Vegas the series (how can you say that when you blow a 3-1 series lead?). But it still shouldn't have been a major under any circumstances.
Tim Way Rule 609. Cross-Checking. ... (a) A minor or a major penalty shall be assessed for cross-checking an opponent. (b) A major plus a game misconduct penalty shall be assessed to any player who injures an opponent as a result of cross-checking .Got a chance to watch the penalty again, it might not have been a penalty at all if Pavelski had not fallen so awkward. Worthy of a minor but not a major. To give up 4 goals on a five minute major is insane. There were only 4 power play goals total in all six games of the DAL/NSH series.
Borderline 2 minutes. Softest major in the history of playoff hockey.
Tim Way Rule 609. Cross-Checking. ... (a) A minor or a major penalty shall be assessed for cross-checking an opponent. (b) A major plus a game misconduct penalty shall be assessed to any player who injures an opponent as a result of cross-checking .
I can go either way.
How fitting would it be if the Leafs season ended on Tavares turnover?
I have been watching hockey for 40 years and I have NEVER seen anything like what I seeing now lol.
"They offered me a one-year deal worth one million. My gut was screaming: "Don't take it, you've got one chance, if it doesn't go well, you're done in the NHL!"
"I told my agent: 'I don't want to play in Detroit for Mike Babcock, I don't trust him. Call him back and tell him thank you, we'll get back to you.'
"My agent then told me the GM put a 15-minute time limit on the offer. I needed to make up my mind in 15 minutes or he was gonna pull the offer off the table. This was July 1st, free agency had just started 10 minutes prior. I called the GM and told him: 'Ken, Mike Commodore here, I like you, you're a good guy. Is it you who wants me or the coach?' Ken Holland said that he wanted me and so did Babcock. So I told him that I would love to play for Ken, and I would love to play for the red wings, but that I didn't trust the coach from previous experience. So I called the coach, by now I had 10 minutes left.
"I called him: 'Babs, Mike Commodore here. Please be honest with me, do you want me on your hockey team or not?' He said he did. I wanted to know if I'd get an opportunity. I told him I am not looking for anything special, but that I needed to know if I was gonna get a fair shot and a chance to play. He said 'I want you on my team. You will get a fair chance. We need someone physical on the back end with a right shot. I want you. You will play.'
"I hung up the phone, five minutes left. My gut screamed 'Say No!' This coach screwed me over nine years ago. He buried me in the paper after I had a good camp in Anaheim. He buried me so I would look bad so he could then play his boy from juniors who was an undrafted rookie at camp that year ... Kurt Sauer. Six years later when I finally had a chance to take a shot back at him publicly I did so in the paper when I was in Columbus. But then I started to think about Detroit, a good team, always makes the playoffs, get to play with great players, and about maybe getting the opportunity. So I took Mike Babcock's word and I signed the contract, thirty minutes into free agency. I signed the [expletive] contract faster than when I was a 'hot commodity' four years earlier. I was one of the first players gone that year in free agency. Off the board July 1st.
"I went to camp in Detroit, and got scratched out. I did injure my knee a bit so I missed couple of days in camp and the first four games. I got back as if it was nothing major. I came back, and the team won its first five games. I got scratched, but okay, the team was winning. We lost seven in a row, then I wasn't even close to playing. Scratch, scratch.
"Finally, it was mid-November,Ian White got a puck to the face and was going to miss a week, we went on a road trip. A four-game road trip, and I thought to myself that this was my chance. I played three games, no two games, I think, three minutes a night… The only time I touched the ice was when the fourth line was on, and the faceoff was in the neutral zone. I was opening the doors for Lidström, that's all I was doing, being a cheerleader.
"Bab then met with me, said he was calling up guys from minors, and scratched me until Christmas. Then the GM forced the coach to play me; I played fifteen games, I fought, I played the best I could with the ice time I was getting. And then I got traded (to Tampa) because Ken Holland felt bad. "
I'm not getting why people are like "well Vegas shouldn't have let in four goals in four minutes." That's called as a minor, it's 3-1 Vegas, and game goes on at 5v5 where Vegas had the edge in nearly all cases: http://moneypuck.com/g.htm?id=2018030187
Without a doubt Gallant should have called a timeout after one or two given the hand he was dealt, and ultimately you gotta play and not choke a series and goal lead, but I'm don't think I agree that we can say the Shorks scoring for is a forgone conclusion without the major. Maybe I'm over thinking it and it is what it is.
Basically what im saying. Sharks don't get that major, they don't win
Basically what im saying. Sharks don't get that major, they don't win
Basically what im saying. Sharks don't get that major, they don't win
Vegas doesnt cross check a guy in the face and cause an injury, they dont get that 5 minute major.
I'm not going to say it was a good call. I will say it makes up for the bad call that happened in Game 2. The series could have been different if the terrible call in Game 2 wasn't called so this to me makes up for that. Plus despite the call, Vegas still blew a 3-1 series lead and they blew a 3-0 goal lead in just a couple minutes. It's not like it was a one goal game and that made the difference. There was a huge gap to overcome still and they did it.Basically what im saying. Sharks don't get that major, they don't win
That might account for the Sharks winning Game 7 but not the series.
I'm not going to say it was a good call. I will say it makes up for the bad call that happened in Game 2. The series could have been different if the terrible call in Game 2 wasn't called so this to me makes up for that. Plus despite the call, Vegas still blew a 3-1 series lead and they blew a 3-0 goal lead in just a couple minutes. It's not like it was a one goal game and that made the difference. There was a huge gap to overcome still and they did it.
I question the legitimacy of your PhD.Vegas doesnt cross check a guy in the face and cause an injury, they dont get that 5 minute major.
Last year they had the lovable underdog role. This year they had expectations. That's the biggest difference.So what was the deal with Vegas this year anyways? They added Patches, Stastny and Stone (at the deadline) and didn't lose too much from last year (Just Perron mostly?). Fleury was healthier this season too but they end up with 16 less points and out in the first round? Did they hit a bad injury bug somewhere along the way or did the league just catch up to them?
They got off to a pretty poor start to the season while Nate Schmidt was suspended, which probably accounts for most of that difference in the regular season. They were really good for most of the rest of the season after that, aside from a fairly weak February. And they were only eliminated in the first round by the narrowest of margins in just about the craziest way imaginable.So what was the deal with Vegas this year anyways? They added Patches, Stastny and Stone (at the deadline) and didn't lose too much from last year (Just Perron mostly?). Fleury was healthier this season too but they end up with 16 less points and out in the first round? Did they hit a bad injury bug somewhere along the way or did the league just catch up to them?
Gary Bettman confirmed VGK will not be part of the expansion draft for SeattleIs Vegas going to be exempt for the expansion draft for Seattle?
EDIT: Nevermind, I thought they were starting within the next couple years. Not starting until 2021-2022 season, feels like a long time from now.
Is Vegas going to be exempt for the expansion draft for Seattle?
EDIT: Nevermind, I thought they were starting within the next couple years. Not starting until 2021-2022 season, feels like a long time from now.
Gary Bettman confirmed VGK will not be part of the expansion draft for Seattle
they didn't expect them to have such a stacked team by now.Completely exempt seems kinda crazy, maybe a different structure but they will be going into their 5th full season that year. Seems like enough time.
Completely exempt seems kinda crazy, maybe a different structure but they will be going into their 5th full season that year. Seems like enough time.
The GMs were informed that any potential future Seattle expansion draft will be conducted under the same conditions as Vegas, and there's an interesting caveat: The Golden Knights aren't likely to be part of the Seattle process at all, according to a source.
There's no reason to expect them to be put in position to lose a player because they're not going to be sharing in the $650-million fee the Oak View Group will be asked to pay if/when the NHL accepts its expansion application. That was part of the deal the league struck with Golden Knights owner Bill Foley when he was granted the 31st franchise.
As a result, the Original 30 will eventually receive $21.67-million apiece from Seattle after cashing $16.67-million cheques from Vegas