That's how I see it too. But you know how this is gonna go...yup this is clearly what she's referring to
We only get two choices, would be much better if we had two "actual" choices. You know, two choices that actually want the country to remain whole
And if there were a true Republican party the Democrats could lean a lot farther left without worrying about Trumpy bullshit getting voted in
I'd certainly prefer multiple ranked choices, or two left parties, or dozens of other options. But twisting what she's saying and pretending it's somehow "wrong" isn't helping anything
Sadly, most of the effort to replace FPTP in this country has been for ranked choice voting (IRV), which still leads to a two-party system for winner-take-all elections.The odds of this happening with our First-Past-The-Post( aka single-member plurality) voting system is slim to none. If we changed the way we voted it'd be a lot more probable and possible.
We need strong opposition. One party rule is dangerous. We don't necessarily need the GOP.
Daily reminder that Democrats suck as much as Republicans, they're only less transparent about it
We need strong opposition. One party rule is dangerous. We don't necessarily need the GOP.
Absolutely not.Daily reminder that Democrats suck as much as Republicans, they're only less transparent about it
Is she right that we should respect having a pro-life position, too? She says it right in that clip.She's right, if the pre-1960's GOP was still around the country would be in a much better place. The southern strategy has morphed them into the Neo-confederacy and the consequences are on full display.
Absolutely, and having something like ranked voting or better would be the first major change toward that progress.Perhaps, but she is implying the current Republican party is not the true party. Hence, "take back".
The odds of this happening with our First-Past-The-Post( aka single-member plurality) voting system is slim to none. If we changed the way we voted it'd be a lot more probable and possible.
Ranked choice ultimately solves nothing. We need either proportional voting, or a voting system that actually eliminates the spoiler effect (i.e. a system that passes the favorite betrayal criterion).She could also advocate for something like this by pushing for ranked-choice voting, but this would hurt her grift from getting money from the donor class that keeps her in power.
On the other hand, this is true. This is a troubling reality, where this leads to a new normal of:In her defense if they don't start stop the bleeding it's gonna be the Qanon party sooner than later.
Daily reminder that Democrats suck as much as Republicans, they're only less transparent about it
On the other hand, this is true. This is a troubling reality, where this leads to a new normal of:
Republican Party --> Qanon Party
Democratic Party --> Moderate Republicans/Moderate Democrats/Progressives
And that Democratic Party will never get anything progressive done.... like ever.
This is about the best option out there. Current moderate Democrats might as well be Republicans at this point. The problem is we need more fresh blood to drive a more Progressive arm.It needs the Republican party dissolved so that the Democratic party can split the moderate wing and progressive wing into its own parties.
It's backhanded shade about how the modern republican party is weak and spineless. She's scolding them for refusing to govern in language that's deliberately chosen to sound appealing to people who usually vote Republican but might be swayed to vote Democrat this time around. And looking at how things have regressed in the last 20+ years, when the Republican party was "weak", not electorally but morally, she's right, if they're going to be one of the two political parties, which they are essentially guaranteed to be, it certainly would be better if they were morally strong and were willing to do the right thing rather than acting as a nihilistic death cult.Why is the most powerful democrat in office supporting republicans during a presidential election?
Moderates were still a thing, especially in state elections. Nationally, the Southern Baptists types took over the party. But you had moderates (currently known as democrats lol) all over the Northeast, winning elections.The devil you know...
Fuck Reagan, Ike was the end for non sociopathic GOP.
True, but there is some upside to IRV even it's not the best option.Sadly, most of the effort to replace FPTP in this country has been for ranked choice voting (IRV), which still leads to a two-party system for winner-take-all elections.
In her defense if they don't start stop the bleeding it's gonna be the Qanon party sooner than later.
This is the dream scenario, where no one caters to the conspiracy theorists and racists anymore, but I fear that orgs like Fox News will continue to prop up the husk of the Republican Party as it Casper slides into Qanon/Proud Nazis.It needs the Republican party dissolved so that the Democratic party can split the moderate wing and progressive wing into its own parties.
Is she right that we should respect having a pro-life position, too? She says it right in that clip.
It's backhanded shade about how the modern republican party is weak and spineless. She's scolding them for refusing to govern in language that's deliberately chosen to sound appealing to people who usually vote Republican but might be swayed to vote Democrat this time around. And looking at how things have regressed in the last 20+ years, when the Republican party was "weak", not electorally but morally, she's right, if they're going to be one of the two political parties, which they are essentially guaranteed to be, it certainly would be better if they were morally strong and were willing to do the right thing rather than acting as a nihilistic death cult.
Sounds like an appeal to the less insane members of the party to go against the current leaders instead of going along with them just to own the libs. An appeal to Rebublican voters who might be swayed to vote Democrat and to Senators to grow a spine.Why is the most powerful democrat in office supporting republicans during a presidential election?
She thinks they're not the Republican Party anymore.Does she not think the Republican Party is strong now? The stronger they are, the worse they make the lives of all but the very rich.
We need strong opposition. One party rule is dangerous. We don't necessarily need the GOP.
In her defense if they don't start stop the bleeding it's gonna be the Qanon party sooner than later.
Daily reminder that Democrats suck as much as Republicans, they're only less transparent about it
It's slightly better than FPTP, but it has a history of being passed, and then later repealed after it horribly fucks up an election, like in Burlington, where the candidate most voters preferred to any of the other candidate lost.True, but there is some upside to IRV even it's not the best option.