Why is everyone just ignoring this post?Excuse me - I don't know why we have a different reviewer on the show now - I'm not looped in on that at all - but I really am not OK with this insinuation and I don't think other folks should be either. Always open to criticism when we get something wrong but I think that criticism should be based in fact and not dark accusations.
D+ Monsters at Work: 5/10
Netflix's Dynasty Warriors: 2/10
The Tomorrow War: 3/10
Loki Ep 4 Review: 5/10
Black Widow Review: 7/10
Godzilla Singular Point: 5/10
Atari VCS Review: 5/10
Those are from the last few days - you don't have to go digging through the archives to find them. And for the record the same critic that gave Ep 4 a 5/10 gave Eps 1-3 all individually 7/10s.
In my 10 years at IGN and my 5+ years writing for other outlets big and small I have NEVER witnessed or experienced any pressure to score anything in any way other than the score I felt it should be given.
Again, I have no insight into why Loki now has a different reviewer - but I'm uncomfortable that so many immediately jump to an extremely serious accusation of... corruption? A lack of editorial independence? It just.... isn't true. And no one seems to care that it isn't true. Everyone seems very content to just slide by comments like this.
how the hell did The Tomorrow War get that high of a score? did the score come up against a problem and it looked off in the distance for 1 second and immediately solve it with the help of a random dark skinned black male?Excuse me - I don't know why we have a different reviewer on the show now - I'm not looped in on that at all - but I really am not OK with this insinuation and I don't think other folks should be either. Always open to criticism when we get something wrong but I think that criticism should be based in fact and not dark accusations.
D+ Monsters at Work: 5/10
Netflix's Dynasty Warriors: 2/10
The Tomorrow War: 3/10
Loki Ep 4 Review: 5/10
Black Widow Review: 7/10
Godzilla Singular Point: 5/10
Atari VCS Review: 5/10
Those are from the last few days - you don't have to go digging through the archives to find them. And for the record the same critic that gave Ep 4 a 5/10 gave Eps 1-3 all individually 7/10s.
In my 10 years at IGN and my 5+ years writing for other outlets big and small I have NEVER witnessed or experienced any pressure to score anything in any way other than the score I felt it should be given.
Again, I have no insight into why Loki now has a different reviewer - but I'm uncomfortable that so many immediately jump to an extremely serious accusation of... corruption? A lack of editorial independence? It just.... isn't true. And no one seems to care that it isn't true. Everyone seems very content to just slide by comments like this.
I'm personally not jumping to anything. I'm just mostly pointing out the problem with toxic people who live in a fantasy world, and think they are doing a just cause for mega corporations profiting off of them by harassing people who dare say something negative.
I really would recommend reading more of his work if that's your impression of him
Seriously, this show is just about watching Loki be Loki and having fun with that, its got no appeal to me beyond that, and feels so disconnected from the MCU it's just a filler story for now.
Yeah I kind of meant like that second suggestion multiple reviewers for one show and they give their own score. I could have sworn IGN did something like that for some of their games. I could be wrong tho haven't visited that site in years.
Excuse me - I don't know why we have a different reviewer on the show now - I'm not looped in on that at all - but I really am not OK with this insinuation and I don't think other folks should be either. Always open to criticism when we get something wrong but I think that criticism should be based in fact and not dark accusations.
D+ Monsters at Work: 5/10
Netflix's Dynasty Warriors: 2/10
The Tomorrow War: 3/10
Loki Ep 4 Review: 5/10
Black Widow Review: 7/10
Godzilla Singular Point: 5/10
Atari VCS Review: 5/10
Those are from the last few days - you don't have to go digging through the archives to find them. And for the record the same critic that gave Ep 4 a 5/10 gave Eps 1-3 all individually 7/10s.
In my 10 years at IGN and my 5+ years writing for other outlets big and small I have NEVER witnessed or experienced any pressure to score anything in any way other than the score I felt it should be given.
Again, I have no insight into why Loki now has a different reviewer - but I'm uncomfortable that so many immediately jump to an extremely serious accusation of... corruption? A lack of editorial independence? It just.... isn't true. And no one seems to care that it isn't true. Everyone seems very content to just slide by comments like this.
I mean, check out some of the game reviews out there who dare to be critical of a tentpole franchise. People lose their shit because their favorite plastic box/phone/game or movie franchise/whatever has any amount of criticism put against it. It's wild.
Me too. The only thing I can think is that if they acknowledge him it doesn't back up their narrative.
When all is one with the Mouse the nonbelievers will be judged and Small Worlded for eternity.
Seriously. I always think about why fanbases for things like this are so repellent and pedantic, and then I think about the root, "fanbase."
There's no way for someone to be unbiased, though. You can't have objective reviews. But I'm wondering what bias are you suspecting?
You really want objective reviews, then just read a plot synopsis. Tell me one example of an objective review.
Can we please not bring personal opinions about the media into question here. The reviewer has all the right to give any piece of media whether it be a game, movie or show whatever score they want and that is absolutely not the issue here. The issue is that this particular reviewer was forced out because of fan backlash which is unacceptable
