Hopefully they smooth out the frame rate, it's kind of rough.
Other than that, I like what I'm playing so far.
Other than that, I like what I'm playing so far.
I don't know how long is it. I just got the Gallery music playing now lol
Thinking about how frequentlyDid the first mission, had a blast! Played on handheld and it does look blurry, but I'll try it on the TV later. The world itself looks beautiful and it was so fun exploring the small section around the castle. When I ran into Lon Lon Ranch I was so excited! Link and Impa are very fun to play, still have to get used to Impa's moveset, didn't quite get how to absorb symbols. Can't wait to play more though!
Some story spoilers...
Time travelling and trying to change the future, huh? This is so overused so I'm not exactly thrilled it's being introduced here, but we'll see what happens!
If you look closely, when the little one opens the portal the guardian sends some malice tru' the portal. Later you can see the malice activates a guardian.
This is why the guardians wake up in a corrupted state.
Nah. I still think it's gonna follow everyone dying. Just it's gonna be a bit more convoluted which I didn't want.Yeah if all or most of what we're imagining turns out to be true, I'll be pretty pissed. If it had just been revealed as a BotW fanservice sequel from the start I wouldn't care, but why lead us to believe it's a canon prequel only to change events for fanservice? They could have made a story between BotW and BotW2 with dimension hopping Champions having to defeat the Yiga and Mystery Sorcerer and been much more straightforward about it. Instead I fear we won't get those moments everyone was excited about: the Champions might live, Link might live, Zelda might not get to fight Ganon... I hope I'm wrong.
Thank you
They're absolutely not missing a chance to throw in some BotW2 stingers. Even I thought that and I've always thought this game would be extremely faithfulNah. I still think it's gonna follow everyone dying. Just it's gonna be a bit more convoluted which I didn't want.
in fact. The new time travel stuff actually leads me to believe it's somehow will tie to BOTW2 which I didn't think it would before.
I don't really see the problem with it given that time travel in general is a staple of the franchise and used heavily so often that this is just an extension of that.Who knows. But there's a few different things I've been thinking of:
-- I've suspected for a while AoC's entire framing device may be that it's a flashback being told to Link by Zelda & whatever other survivors are still around after BotW. If that's the case (and it's possible that might not be revealed until the ending cutscene, or something), then there's a chance we're getting Unreliable Narration and the events depicted in AoC will not match up exactly with the actual backstory of BotW.
-- It's been clear that Nintendo/Koei was going to have to do something to explain the use of runes and slate powers in AoC, since that runs directly counter to how they're portrayed in BotW. Time travel, while probably not ideal by any fan's standards, is one easy way to do that. Time travel is a well that both Nintendo and Koei have drawn from many times before, so they're quite used to it as a way to solve their story-related problems.
-- Nintendo likely got cold feet at the idea of the ending not featuring Link. Not only does he not participate in the final battle, he won't even be present for the last several missions. I just don't think, when they sat down to draw up the game, they could stomach the idea of that. We all know how protective they are of Link. The idea of killing him off and having the last several missions not involve him was probably more than they could bear.
-- Since a huge part of the appeal of these warriors games, and Hyrule Warriors as our direct antecedent to AoC, is the vast number of characters, including time travel is an easy way to expand what would otherwise be a fairly limited cast.
We'll see what happens, but these are all things I'm suspecting may have factored into the decision to go the FF7R route (speaking of, I wonder how annoyed Nintendo/Koei might be that Nomura had the same idea and brought it to market first with FF7R. Think of how much more attention this storyline trick would have gotten if we hadn't already seen it earlier this very year!).
I hope this is the case, would explain why it's in a box in Zelda's room yet nobody has ever seen it before.While I didn't expect the mini guardian to appear the way it did I'm almost certain that thecurrent time version of it was the thing spying on them from behind the tree, which will be reprogrammed and boxed up after the the time travel version sacrifices itself for Zelda, ensuring a stable loop.
I don't see how it's not canon when the website for the game says stuff like "this is the only way to experience first hand what happened 100 years ago"I don't really see the problem with it given that time travel in general is a staple of the franchise and used heavily so often that this is just an extension of that.
We haven't seen any data thus far to insinuate that there's going to be "happy" endings for everything but the short answer to that is this is not canon (or is it? Who knows.)
If they change things in the plot to fit this new scenario at least it's established from the first cutscenes what's going on versus FF7R's approach of "Hey here's some spoopy ghosts but also lol here's a bunch of random extra shit."
I think the "tone" of the first scene was such that we'll still have either heavy moments or bad ends for everyone involved, and even if we don't, we know it's not canon due to the way BOTW plays out. If I end up being wrong and they cancel out BOTW then yeah we can talk, but I don't think they're stupid enough to do that.
If anything this will be used to bring in more characters and more things into the game to play with and more spinoff chapters, which I don't see as a problem so long as there's a "true" ending that matches the original intent.
I mean "this is the only way to experience it" still doesn't equate to canon and/or doesn't equate to alternate timeline of events.I don't see how it's not canon when the website for the game says stuff like "this is the only way to experience first hand what happened 100 years ago"
And FF7R was advertised as a remake. I hope Nintendo isn't pulling a fast one on us here, would really make me wish they didn't bother and just made a Hyrule Warriors 2 if they did that.I don't see how it's not canon when the website for the game says stuff like "this is the only way to experience first hand what happened 100 years ago"
Oh yeah, if there's alternate endings and stuff that's fine. But I want the original story chronicled here at leastI mean "this is the only way to experience it" still doesn't equate to canon and/or doesn't equate to alternate timeline of events.
We'll just have to see in the main game. Compared to FF7R redoing an entire story I know and character beats and motivations, adding in some runes and towers and slightly altering events (as of now) is far less of a transgression to me, especially in a franchise that uses time as often it does.
Even if this is "canon" it being an alternate timeline by way of time travelling eggbot still leaves them with a completely separate group of events to play with that will be similar to the canon events (hopefully) in the big beats.
I mean we know Akkala at least gets wrecked. Even if there's a "good end" and "true end" to all the missions I'll still enjoy it. Having bad guy missions and alternate "bad guys win" scenarios isn't a deal breaker for me personally.
The attachment to "canon" in a series that constantly stomps on and/or changes its canon was long since lost on me.
from that first teaser FF7R definitely seemed like it was going to reimagine a lot. The tone of AoC has always been "you know that story in the background of BotW? We're gonna show it to you"And FF7R was advertised as a remake. I hope Nintendo isn't pulling a fast one on us here, would really make me wish they didn't bother and just made a Hyrule Warriors 2 if they did that.
I won't be able to play until later tonight. How is everyone feeling about what they played?
Very fun and a instant buy for me. I walked in with low expectations and had fun. I need a game like this. This also shot my desire for BOTW2 like crazy lolI won't be able to play until later tonight. How is everyone feeling about what they played?
Do you think the final build will be any better?
We don't know, it could go either way.Just jumped into the thread - wait, what?
so this isn't the canon prequel we were expecting? It's some alt reality thing?
Also yeah damn, this runs badly. Not a good look for a Zelda game.
We don't know. There's several ways to pull of a time travel story(one being alt timeline, another is it already happened and the main results cannot be changed). Too little to know for sureJust jumped into the thread - wait, what?
so this isn't the canon prequel we were expecting? It's some alt reality thing?
Why are people thinking it's non canon? I haven't touched the demo.
If it's not canon I won't be picking it up, as I've had my fill of HW with the first one
Why are people thinking it's non canon? I haven't touched the demo.
If it's not canon I won't be picking it up, as I've had my fill of HW with the first one