• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,165
Gentrified Brooklyn


ElhRZr1WkAAIeJI


Damn.

"We have the greatest respect for the journalist Glenn Greenwald used to be"
 

Ignatz Mouse

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,741
I mean, sure, him going all in on the Hunter Biden stuff seems appropriately like his big break from reality moment, but he's also seemingly had some pretty decent positions on issues and I think that while it seems like he went head over hills too far in attacking the Russian interference, I do think some of his criticisms land there just based upon the bit I've been reading up about him and those stories (I think mainstream news media's decisions to run wild with crazy ass Russian stories definitely obscured some of the reality, and I'd agree there were bad tendencies to come off with Russophobic language and opinions as someone who has studied the region quite extensively myself). Like, clearly an individual trending downward and choosing increasingly poor hills to die on including the classic "censorship to a fault" one that catches far too many usually smarter than that people...

But like, "Fuck you, scum of the earth type responses" feel a bit wild for someone who just lost the plot and tanked his own reputation to the point of de-platforming himself.

Long story short, he's run interference on every bit of news about Trump corruption (particularly related to Russia, but not exclusively) since Trump won.

Yeah, he deserves vitriol.
 

Nola

Member
Oct 29, 2017
8,083
This is stupid, he's just an idiot. Plenty of idiots in the media and on Twitter with bad takes, vast majority of them are not 'Russian agents'.
Sounded like one doesnt mean you are one, but he unequivocally carried the water for them during the lead up to and in the aftermath of 2016. Up to Today.

Including unironically acting as a guest of honor at an RT panel on fake news where he spent the entire time, at an RT panel on fake news, decrying US journalism And the US intelligence community. Again, at a panel hosted by RT, where he spent all of his time focusing on American intelligence and supposed news censorship.
 
OP
OP
Mezentine

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,978
Hunter Biden isn't running for President, lmao. I don't care what he is or isn't doing lest he's killing people on his father's orders or something crazy.

In a battle of the children: Hunter vs Ivanka, Don Jr, Jared.... in terms of who really been out there doing dirt....that's really the angle Biden's political opponents are taking?!?

Just seems irrelevant.
The American voter seems to agree with you lol
 

BlueTsunami

Member
Oct 29, 2017
8,512


I love that some people are tut tutting this response as unprofessional (on Twitter) . It sounds more like The Intercept knows Greenwald will form his own unfiltered Alex Jones like venture and decided to let it be known to the world the hack he's become. The letter will stick like stink to his credibility.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Sounded like one doesnt mean you are one, but he unequivocally carried the water for them during the lead up to and in the aftermath of 2016.

Including unironically acting as a guest of honor at an RT panel on fake news where he spent the entire time, at an RT panel on fake news, decrying US journalism.
Greenwald is the kind of person who is so ego-centric that he will go anywhere that will give him praise regardless of the source. Hence why he shows up on Fucker Carlson's White Power Hour, why he goes on Joe Rogan's show, etc. It makes him worthless as a journalist because he cares more about being agreed with than he does about the truth, and it's led him down a spiral of taking increasingly insane positions he refuses to ever back down from.

He's not a Russian agent because he will do that shit for free to serve his own ego.
 

gozu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,359
America
Hardly seems like he's worth the absolute vitriol this thread is spitting out towards him. He's a journalist with some seemingly bad takes, but he absolutely did manage to be on the money with others from what I've seen. Just seems like he's insanely critical of modern centrist Democrats and the Russia Investigation and that's why people are so quick to spit fire against him. I'm not super familiar with his work or him, so I'm just going off of what I've read in the past 20 minutes, but uh, why is he a hell spawn that deserves all this hate and effort?

He's been harmful and is trying to be even more harmful now with his nonsense. I'm glad he resigned and he can fuck off. I don't think him principled or honorable. Just a selfish contrarian.
 

Kernel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,896
I don't know where Glenn went off track, at times I've thought of him as a really great investigative journalist, but recently man I don't get it. It seems he spends so much time catering to these really weird viewpoints and whining about freeze peach on Twitter. It's really disappointing.

Like you're really going to go out because of this stupid ass Hunter Biden story?

Glenn Greenwald is a cautionary tale what happens when you oppose US imperialism so much you'll support anyone who's even remotely against it(or appears to be)
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,680
Greenwald said:
One outcome is that the Biden campaign concluded, rationally, that there is no need for the front-running presidential candidate to address even the most basic and relevant questions raised by these materials. Rather than condemn Biden for ignoring these questions -- the natural instinct of a healthy press when it comes to a presidential election -- journalists have instead led the way in concocting excuses to justify his silence.
Two paragraphs in and my eyes are already rolling out of their sockets
 

Orb

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,465
USA
Two paragraphs in and my eyes are already rolling out of their sockets
His tone is a little bit more conspiratorial and combative than I'd like but he lays out some good points that are incontrovertible.

For example, you see many posts in this thread calling the laptop stuff "Russian disinformation" despite the fact that multiple investigative parties have said that there is literally zero evidence of this.
 
His stuff on Brazil is great, and I will never deny that he's committed to his positions on anti-imperialism and free speech absolutism, but man something about modern left–liberalism and anti-Trumpism just drives him bonkers and to contrarian extremes.
Greenwald has some well-founded criticisms of the national security state and DC establishment (I share many of them), but it's been clear to me for several years that being anti-establishment is the center of his whole worldview, so to the extent that they are against Trump, he ends up defending Trump.

But in the last year or so he seems to have gone beyond even that to parroting what even he should be able to identify as obvious misinformation.
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,680
So he adds nothing to the story other than complaining how other news outlets covered it, and leaning in on the "but why won't the campaign address these very important questions?" concern trolling.
Okay then...
 

caliph95

Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,203
How can someone be so good in regards to Brazil and anti imperialism not so great in regards almost everything else
 

Newlib

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,822
His tone is a little bit more conspiratorial and combative than I'd like but he lays out some good points that are incontrovertible.

For example, you see many posts in this thread calling the laptop stuff "Russian disinformation" despite the fact that multiple investigative parties have said that there is literally zero evidence of this.

Except Rudy has been working with a known Russian source on his investigation and this material had been floating around the Ukraine for nearly two years only to magically appear in a laptop that has a completely preposterous explanation.
 

Book One

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,823


man.

lots of people recognized Greenwald's collapse for a while now, though I know he had a lot of defenders around here that tried to fight it. Clearly The Intercept itself saw his spiral too.

But trying to help legitimize Trump's Hunter Biden bullshit should pretty much tell you all you need to know about what he is now (and what his defenders are all about)
 

Orb

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,465
USA
Uh huh....so you're saying Hunter Biden is never going to be President?

Glenn bags another big game!
I believe the truth is important and thus far we have no evidence to believe that the laptop is Russian disinformation. No one in Biden's camp has ever claimed the emails and texts aren't real. Both of those factual statements lead me to believe we should be okay with raising questions about the information laid out in the leaked material. If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,328
I believe the truth is important and thus far we have no evidence to believe that the laptop is Russian disinformation. No one in Biden's camp has ever claimed the emails and texts aren't real. Both of those factual statements lead me to believe we should be okay with raising questions about the information laid out in the leaked material. If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked.

Biden never denied his son eating children either... we better start asking that question too
 

Cat Party

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,426
I believe the truth is important and thus far we have no evidence to believe that the laptop is Russian disinformation. No one in Biden's camp has ever claimed the emails and texts aren't real. Both of those factual statements lead me to believe we should be okay with raising questions about the information laid out in the leaked material. If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked.
You could have just posted "I'm just asking questions" and saved us all some time.
 

cameron

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
23,831
I believe the truth is important and thus far we have no evidence to believe that the laptop is Russian disinformation. No one in Biden's camp has ever claimed the emails and texts aren't real. Both of those factual statements lead me to believe we should be okay with raising questions about the information laid out in the leaked material. If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked.
What are the questions you want raised from the leaked emails and photos?
 

iksenpets

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,502
Dallas, TX
He tweeted the emails he was sent "censoring" him, and I don't think this helps his case at all. This reads like completely benign criticism of an overheated article.
 

Distantmantra

Member
Oct 26, 2017
11,175
Seattle
I believe the truth is important and thus far we have no evidence to believe that the laptop is Russian disinformation. No one in Biden's camp has ever claimed the emails and texts aren't real. Both of those factual statements lead me to believe we should be okay with raising questions about the information laid out in the leaked material. If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked.

As soon as the Biden campaign directly responds to any of it regardless of the answer, it will be used against them. If it's not real and they can't produce anything significantly damming, the best course of action is not to give it power. Seems pretty obvious.
 

Newlib

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,822
Do you believe the laptop is Russian disinformation? If so, what leads you to this belief other than a gut feeling?

What do you think disinformation means? It's very clearly information that Russian sources are filtering through Rudy who is attempting to pass off through sympathetic outlets.
 

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,165
Gentrified Brooklyn
His tone is a little bit more conspiratorial and combative than I'd like but he lays out some good points that are incontrovertible.

For example, you see many posts in this thread calling the laptop stuff "Russian disinformation" despite the fact that multiple investigative parties have said that there is literally zero evidence of this.

Yeah, but that's not really a gotcha moment is it? The basic assumption is that since everyone agrees that there is an active disinformation campaign regarding Russia that this kinda gets dumped into the pile. Which is lazy journalism that's been a mainstay this election cycle (back to the Trump Pee tape!) but doesn't prove that there's a conspiracy to discount the story. Just that the US has a hard-on for making Russia the boogeyman. Which I mean, America?
 

Zastava

Member
Feb 19, 2018
2,108
London


Glenn Greenwald said:
Willis references a post by Kevin Drum at Washington Monthly, which quotes a letter from anti-illegal-immigration Congressman Tom Tancredo to his supporters in which Rep. Tancredo asks for help in what Tancredo calls the "struggle to preserve our national identity against the tide of illegal immigrants flooding the United States." In response to Tancredo's letter, Willis snidely writes:

Hey, Tom Tancredo . . . Just say "white power" and get it off your chest.

So, there's Willis' self-satisfied decree, in its vapid entirety. According to Willis (and many of Drum's commentators, if not Drum himself), anyone who believes that it's important for a nation to be comprised of citizens who have at least some joint national allegiance and a minimal common foundation -- never mind a common language in which they can communicate with one another -- is a White Supremacist bigot.....

.....

Snidely spitting out the "racist" insult as part of the illegal immigration debate is nothing more than a cheap and lazy way to irrationally smear people who espouse a certain view for the purpose of shutting down debate. And in this case, the smear Willis attempts -- that to believe in the importance of "national identity" is to make you a "white power" racist -- does not withstand even the most minimal scrutiny.....

......

Current illegal immigration – whereby unmanageably endless hordes of people pour over the border in numbers far too large to assimilate, and who consequently have no need, motivation or ability to assimilate – renders impossible the preservation of any national identity.

Who can be shocked someone who wrote this (and these are just excerpts, the whole thing is fucking long) would end up caping for white nationalists and a wannabe fascist.
 
OP
OP
Mezentine

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,978
He tweeted the emails he was sent "censoring" him, and I don't think this helps his case at all. This reads like completely benign criticism of an overheated article.

You know I was about a third of the way into doing a chunk by chunk breakdown of this piece, but its too long, so I'll just say: when your opening thousand words state, essentially, that Biden isn't corrupt, that all the attempts to corrupt him failed, and that no actual misconduct or financial malfeasance took place, you're not standing on the sturdiest of ground for your "biggest story of the election" claim
 

cameron

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
23,831
Do you believe the laptop is Russian disinformation? If so, what leads you to this belief other than a gut feeling?
It's not. It's does get disseminated by Russian troll farms, right-wing clowns, and chapo degenerates though. Some of the leaked personal content was shopped around in Ukraine last year. Rudy and his ilk went for it.

Now that's settled. What are the questions you want raised from the leaked emails and photos?

And should Ilhan Omar respond to every right-wing nonsense aimed at her? As you said "If those questions lead to nothingburgers, that's fine. But we shouldn't be afraid of having the questions asked", correct?
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,680
You know I was about a third of the way into doing a chunk by chunk breakdown of this piece, but its too long, so I'll just say: when your opening thousand words state, essentially, that Biden isn't corrupt, that all the attempts to corrupt him failed, and that no actual misconduct or financial malfeasance took place, you're not standing on the sturdiest of ground for your "biggest story of the election" claim
The "biggest story" to him is how he perceives the media as killing a story presented as a charge with no credibility. Tells you all you really need to know.
I'd be happy this fuckface has left but he's just gonna start a patreon and as shown on this page, likely have sadsacks supporting his fucking delusions.
Gotta get in on that grift money.
 

Nola

Member
Oct 29, 2017
8,083
His tone is a little bit more conspiratorial and combative than I'd like but he lays out some good points that are incontrovertible.

For example, you see many posts in this thread calling the laptop stuff "Russian disinformation" despite the fact that multiple investigative parties have said that there is literally zero evidence of this.
I dont think you understand what disinformation is. It doesn't have to be proven to be originated by shady Russian backroom plotting to be used as such. However, 50 intelligence agents have signed a letter saying this story has all the hallmarks and redflags.

Whether this has tentacles into the GRU, time will tell, but we already know they are attempting to coordinate and signal boost messaging on this and so far there is zero information that corroborates the allegations this shop owner has made. Yet for some reason Greenwald is passionately calling justified skepticism and smart editorial restraint to not signal boost allegations hat have not been independently verified as censorship.
 

IggyChooChoo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,230
I feel like we'll be seeing The Intercept and other journalists push back hard against this part about how to establish "high levels of confidence in the materials:
With an archive of this size, one can never independently authenticate every word in every last document unless the subject of the reporting voluntarily confirms it in advance, which they rarely do. What has been done with similar archives is journalists obtain enough verification to create high levels of journalistic confidence in the materials. Some of the materials provided by the source can be independently confirmed, proving genuine access by the source to a hard drive, a telephone, or a database. Other parties in email chains can confirm the authenticity of the email or text conversations in which they participated. One investigates non-public facts contained in the documents to determine that they conform to what the documents reflect. Technology specialists can examine the materials to ensure no signs of forgeries are detected.

On that subject it seems that:
  • Journalists have not gotten access to the actual files themselves, nor the hardware the files are stored on, so their validity can't be independently confirmed that way
  • No technology specialists have examined the files or the hardware
  • Non-public facts may confirm that the documents are real; however, none are introduced in the article
So the full basis for establishing "high levels of confidence in the materials" seems to be:
  • The word of Bobolinski vouching for the email chains he was on
  • That the pictures of Hunter seem real, with Glenn asserting "their authenticity is not in doubt"
  • That Biden hasn't denied the materials
Am I missing something here?
 

Orb

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,465
USA
Now that's settled. What are the questions you want raised from the leaked emails and photos?
I don't care about the photos at all. I don't think anyone does. Regarding the texts and emails, I think it's fair to ask the question of whether connections to Joe were used as a bargaining chip by the Biden family in dealings with foreign countries. And if so, how much did Joe know about it or was involved in it? I think those are fair questions to ask.
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,680
I feel like we'll be seeing The Intercept and other journalists push back hard against this part about how to establish "high levels of confidence in the materials:


On that subject it seems that:
  • Journalists have not gotten access to the actual files themselves, nor the hardware the files are stored on, so their validity can't be independently confirmed that way
  • No technology specialists have examined the files or the hardware
  • Non-public facts may confirm that the documents are real; however, none are introduced in the article
So the full basis for establishing "high levels of confidence in the materials" seems to be:
  • The word of Bobolinski vouching for the email chains he was on
  • That the pictures of Hunter seem real, with Glenn asserting "their authenticity is not in doubt"
  • That Biden hasn't denied the materials
Am I missing something here?
Nope, I think you just about nailed it.
 

cameron

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
23,831
I don't care about the photos at all. I don't think anyone does. Regarding the texts and emails, I think it's fair to ask the question of whether connections to Joe were used as a bargaining chip by the Biden family in dealings with foreign countries. And if so, how much did Joe know about it or was involved in it? I think those are fair questions to ask.
What deal? When did it happen?