lol I don't know what else to tell you.How do you know its hubris when he's never uttered a single word? Is hubris just the word we use now to excuse illogical character decisions?
lol I don't know what else to tell you.How do you know its hubris when he's never uttered a single word? Is hubris just the word we use now to excuse illogical character decisions?
It doesn't surprise me in the least that critics feelings were mixed about the episode.
Decimating an army of that size is a wet fart? The WW wiped out several cultures and houses on their way to Winterfell and then wiped out even more once they arrived.I mean, the weirdness, mysticism, and power of the WW/Others is literally the first scene of the show. Sorry for expecting more than a wet fart after 8 years (more since I read the books prior).
Well there is atleast one more battle. I think Missandei might be Hand of the Queen if Dany wins. Etc.Definitely agree, yet at the same time I feel that for an episode that was marketed as "this is where stakes get really high and people die", it's stupid that so many named characters survived the total and complete onslaught that was happening around them.
Some of them don't even have a meaningful arc anymore. I mean, what kind of use could someone like Missandei, Grey Worm or Thormund realistically still have to the story?
You learned where the White Walkers came from. You saw where they basically "live". You saw their historic impact on Westeros, and you saw them come into several major conflicts with principal characters. Did you also want the Night King to monologue about his family and his hatred for the World of Man?I mean, the weirdness, mysticism, and power of the WW/Others is literally the first scene of the show. Sorry for expecting more than a wet fart after 8 years (more since I read the books prior).
We're going to have to agree to disagree. It is plainly obvious that they were operating as a vanguard unit. And while the plan was ultimately to survive and funnel the NK into where Bran was, standard military planning and actions were still very much required and appropriate. In that regard, pushing the battle away from Winterfell's front gates 100% makes sense for a variety of reasons.
They got overwhelmed by a massive army they did not anticipate and did not see coming.
Literally replace white walkers or night king with any type of character in any show and see how silly of an argument this is. Knowing the motivations and characters of threats our protagonists face is an incredibly important part of building real drama we care about rather than just eye candy spectacle.I honestly can't sympathize with those who wanted to know more about the White Walkers or Night King. They're a supernatural threat meant to unite most of the cast under a single banner. What purpose is served by knowing why the big zombie horde is doing what they're doing? Feels like unnecessary exposition.
Well, to be fair I think a lot of folks predicted that Melessandra would return for the final fight against the white walkers. I thought that would happen. I just didn't expect this episode to be that final fight, you know?I'm behind, but anyone who "predicted" Melesandra coming back and helping are just big fat phonies who lifted spoilers.
I'm sure a bunch of other well circulated "predictions" are going to happen as well with zero deviation!
Thanks for writing this. I'm still reading through the thread (100+ pages since the start of the episode, WOW) but the number of folks that didn't catch any of that was wild to me.Melisandre told her she'd close many eyes, and she specifically mentioned "Green eyes, Brown eyes, and blue eyes."
Do you remember what Gendry said when she asked him what they were like, and he said "They're like death?"
WELL WHAT DO WE SAY TO THE GOD OF DEATH
Hey, can you name a SINGLE thing that gives you this idea?I don't think the Night King is "gone" gone. We'll see what happens next episode. I smell some fuckery coming.
Exactly.How can Arya take a white walkers face if when killed they disintegrate?
They're not really angry at that. The gif with the toilet flushing is what they're really angry at. Their pet theories are all down the drain.Wait a minute, didn't Arya basically get ninja training in Braavos? Why are people saying that the way she killed the Night King was stupid????
this is why everything else was so dark so they could spend the money these shots :p
The irony is that as beautiful as that is, the dragons-in-fog sequences were among my most irritating. Wasn't really tense; just annoying. "I can't see shit".
He was a First Man who was changed into a Ice Demon via a magical ceremony and he uses a variety of Ice magic lol so to me its not a very big reach that he would be immune to fire. Also we had a few hints in the show that Wight Walkers themselves were immune or highly resistant to the effects of fire and dragonfire. The Night King is the King of the Wights so it would make sense that he has the same resistance.
Also Bran saying "I don't know. Nobody has ever tried it...." when he was asked about it was a dead giveaway to me that he would be immune.
They were way higher up than they were in beyond the wall.I don't understand why the Night King didn't have his top guys throwing ice lances at the dragons while they rode around lost in the blizzard.
They were shown at several points to literally put out fires, even magical ones by proximity alone. It was a nice hope to think it'd be as easy as stopping them with dragonfire or even regular fire like the wights. But seems their literally only weakness is the specific metal that created them in the first place.Can you point out where? I honestly don't remember any hints that they were immune to dragonfire.
He does ride a dragon though.No. There is nothing that states that Targaryens are immune to fire as a rule.
....No. He was a First Man. The Targaryens came to Westeros thousands of years after that.
Also, Targaryens are not immune to fire. Only Dany (and in the books, only in that specific moment where she hatched the dragon eggs...). Remember Viserys?
The Night King being immune to dragonfire is just some silly twist to inflate tension. There's no reason he should be.
Did you also want the Night King to monologue about his family and his hatred for the World of Man?
I probably read these books years before you ever even started the show.
lmao, you are being so childish. there is not an ounce of logic in what you just said.We literally spent 8 seasons with a main character whose entire story was predicated on this battle, and when it happened he didn't do a single thing. Thats fucking hilariously awful writing. People clapping their hands at the spectacle means nothing about the actual substance of the writing.
Standard Military planning would've seen The Unsullied push out to meet the Dead at a midpoint in the battle, with the Trebs behind the rear lines, and the Dothraki waiting in the wings to sweep the mid or rear of the dead once the two fronts were engaged. The reason this didn't happen wasn't because they decided to use the Dothraki as Vanguard and Jon/Dany as Cavalry. The reason it didn't happen is because, for whatever reason, the show just doesn't put much into actual medieval tactics.
Remember that Jon and Dany were never supposed to enter the main battle at all. They were supposed to gank NK when he revealed himself. So if Dany doesn't freak out and join the battle forcing Jon to support her, Then the Dothraki just run out and die with the Unsullied holding a severely pushed back line that's set up behind their own Trebs for some reason. It was incredbly tactically unsound and not at all suited for an advance.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-wi...e-of-thrones-books-end-60-minutes-2019-04-15/
April 15th interview with George:
"I don't think Dan and Dave's ending is going to be that different from my ending," says author George R.R. Martin about the HBO series moving beyond his books
i'm just saying I waited years for what this season represents and now feel super deflatedWhile of course you are allowed to criticize, saying shit like this makes you come of as elitist: "Look at me I've read the books and I am more of a fan than you, my opinion matters more" is basically what you are saying and that doesn't help your argument at all.
Dany is a lot of things, but she is not a tactician.
The Dothraki did what the Dothraki do. Charge headlong into battle to inflict shock and awe. (See Loot Train)
I think they expected the undead to behave as infantry as they aren't mounted. They figured they could go in, inflict some damage, and get out. They didn't expect a WALL of undead. You could see it in the Bloodrider's face... he was looking down and straight ahead... and then UP and OH GOD.
So when is Bronn showing up?
How will Varys die?
Who will push Bran's wheelchair, and what will Bran do now? Does he care about who wins the throne? Why did Jon have to know about his parents? Why does not-Bran-anymore care?
Also, remember when Jojen said we would know when it's the end when it would be the end, and he stared at his hand on fire? Is that forgotten or still meaningful?
The irony is that as beautiful as that is, the dragons-in-fog sequences were among my most irritating. Wasn't really tense; just annoying. "I can't see shit".
This very nice still only serves to remind me of that.
whole scene was really weird. there was some good tension with sansa and tyrion, then they decide to do... something, and then... nothing. ok?The Sansa scene actually makes me angry. Like, when she pulled out the knife and the dramatic music swelled I got genuinely emotional thinking she was about to sacrifice herself for her people, an end to her character that would have been totally unexpected and surprising. And then literally nothing happens, nobody important dies, and Sansa isn't seen again until the end when she's perfectly fine.
So disappointing you apparently didn't pay any attention to the fact that she literally spent an entire season training to be a stealthy assassin
Yeah that's fine. But it doesn't explain why the dragons didn't take to the field EARLIER. If the moment the undead wave approached, the dragons took to flight to raze them and later got caught in the blizzard and getting fucked over, forcing the Dothraki to march, then OK.correct. as soon as the dragons entered the fray, the WW's cast that smokey haze spell to make it difficult for the dragons to see their targets, which also caused a breakdown in their planning (Melissandre having to light the fire around Winterfell).
Yeah, sure. But then why would he die to Valyrian steel, which is steel forged in dragonfire? Kinda sketchy but oh well.He was a First Man who was changed into a Ice Demon via a magical ceremony and he uses a variety of Ice magic lol so to me its not a very big reach that he would be immune to fire. Also we had a few hints in the show that Wight Walkers themselves were immune or highly resistant to the effects of fire and dragonfire. The Night King is the King of the Wights so it would make sense that he has the same resistance.
"Visual" delight is right. ;) Call me shallow but when book-Euron looks like this....He is such a visual delight to imagine in the books. How they adapted him to a one-note villain for the show is beyond me. What a waste. Second only to Dawn just being a regular-ass sword.
Same logic can be applied to gun fights where none of the stars die. Hell, Storm Trooper fights. It's a show/movie.
I think the main issue for me is showing the battle as such a huge onslaught, yet miraculously all the named characters survive while more experienced soldiers die by the droves.Well there is atleast one more battle. I think Missandei might be Hand of the Queen if Dany wins. Etc.
Nothing states that only a Targaryen can ride a dragon either.
grrm gave 4 diffrent answers that contradict eachother in his 60 minutes interview.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-wi...e-of-thrones-books-end-60-minutes-2019-04-15/
April 15th interview with George:
"I don't think Dan and Dave's ending is going to be that different from my ending," says author George R.R. Martin about the HBO series moving beyond his books
it says more about the living and their willingness to fight even when the odds are against them... how the white walkers react is open to interpretation, but it's obvious that the NK thought he had winterfell in the bag and he was going to finally kill the 3ER.How is "his hubris killed him" good storytelling though?
When Oberyn was killed because of his hubris, it made sense in the story because he was seeking vengeance and justice, and wanted a public confession. That his hubris led to his downfall is tragic. It's a meaningful character beat.
What about the Night King dying because of his hubris makes this narrative better? Why was there 8 seasons of build up for his hubris to be his downfall? What does that say about him, or the White Walkers, or the Long Night, or anything else about the world?
They got overwhelmed by a massive army they did not anticipate and did not see coming.
Dany is a lot of things, but she is not a tactician.
The Dothraki did what the Dothraki do. Charge headlong into battle to inflict shock and awe. (See Loot Train)
I think they expected the undead to behave as infantry as they aren't mounted. They figured they could go in, inflict some damage, and get out. They didn't expect a WALL of undead. You could see it in the Bloodrider's face... he was looking down and straight ahead... and then UP and OH GOD.
They had no idea what formation or tactics the NK was gonna use.
And it was the first time they saw dead in numbers so high the behaved more like a tidal wave of bones and knives than just zombies here and there. I think they were caught pretty off guard by the sheer numbers.
When has Dany ever been a tactician?
Scary? Yeah
Tenacious? Definitively
Brilliant Military mind? I dunno bout that one, chief.
He's. Not. A. Targaryen.