If FSR 2.0 can reach the same results, or even better, with an even lower base resolution, that would be awesome! Reaching the same details from the fidelity mode shouldn't be a problem then, given that the differences were hardly noticeable between the performance RT and 4K modes (according to Digital Foundry).
as long as they can go even lower, we have seen UE5 TSR scaling all the way down from sub 1080p. Insomnaics temporal injection technical is impressive for what it does but downgrade in IQ is still very obvious, IE image softness and distance shimmering on top of reduced fidelity, FSR 2.0 looks like a step up. Ghostwire Tokyo on PC will be interesting to see as it uses the new TSR with multiple preset not the old TAAU based on the pc graphical option. FSR 2.0 will probably be just as good if not better.
The wires on the balloons are a lot worse in native than the other two.
on a 4K tv it's probably a wash, especially in motion. Which is probably AMD's goal anyway, close enough so it doesn't matter
Left: FSR 2.0, Right: DLSS 2.3
Interesting. It looks like DLSS is trying to add more detail than it needs and it kind of fails in this scene. Specifically on the roof with the two heads. FSR 2.0 looks a lot more desirable to me. In the native image it doesn't have the lines on the roof showing through the red paint. The faces are also pixelated in the DLSS image. Of course, everything will come down to how it looks in motion but it's definitely interesting to see the difference in the approach here.
I mean even FSR 1.0 is probably a wash on a 4K TV from normal sitting distance. That's not really the point of talking about new upscaling technologies though.
That I'm less convinced by having used it against DLSS myself on a TV, there's clear aggressive aliasing and smudging differences.
What reason is that and what open source platform are you referring to?
You're comparing one scene in one game with unknown settings used for both options. There is nothing to compare for now, it's just two images. Sharpness is user controlled in DLSS for example and I'd expect the same to be the case for FSR2. Also consider that base image for a comparison here should be native with AA, not DLSSed or FSR2ed. Also yeah motion - which is the most likely area where a non-AI temporal reconstruction may fail.
Only because they add a sharpening filter with FSR X. But from what I could gather both solutions are very similar. I doubt you can do much better than an fully custom implementation that is working on only one platform. There is also the performance cost to be taken into account.
Isnt the recent hack from nvidia reveal that the A.I component from DLSS 2.x is only doing very basic things. It is just a very good anti aliaser that produce very clean edges, as we can see even from DLSS 1.0 with tensor cores, but the actual image reconstruction is still relying of motion vector and taking previous frames much like TAAU, which was implement in version 2.0. of DLSS. FSR 2.0 sounds it just lacking the A.I anti aliaser, which we need to see what AMD has cooked up because FSR 1.0 doesnt even have any anti aliasing component. Those FSR 2.0 comparison image for death loops looks great when it comes to edges.
It's just different sharpening levels, DLSS sometimes uses too much and it's good Nvidia finally gave in and allowed it to be an option. God of War DLSS was especially bad with the devs making the default sharpen too high until you could change it.
Left: FSR 2.0, Right: DLSS 2.3
Interesting. It looks like DLSS is trying to add more detail than it needs and it kind of fails in this scene. Specifically on the roof with the two heads. FSR 2.0 looks a lot more desirable to me. In the native image it doesn't have the lines on the roof showing through the red paint. The faces are also pixelated in the DLSS image. Of course, everything will come down to how it looks in motion but it's definitely interesting to see the difference in the approach here.
AMD said:
| FSR 2.0 Quality Mode | Description | Scale factor | Input resolution | Output resolution |
| Quality | "Quality" mode provides similar or better than native image quality with a projected significant performance gain. | 1.5x per dimension (2.25x area scale) (67% screen resolution) | 1280 x 720 1706 x 960 2293 x 960 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 2560 x 1440 3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160 |
| Balanced | "Balanced" mode offers an ideal compromise between image quality and projected performance gains. | 1.7x per dimension (2.89x area scale) (59% screen resolution) | 1129 x 635 1506 x 847 2024 x 847 2259 x 1270 | 1920 x 1080 2560 x 1440 3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160 |
| Performance | "Performance" mode provides image quality similar to native image quality with a projected major performance gain. | 2.0x per dimension (4x area scale) (50% screen resolution) | 960 x 540 1280 x 720 1720 x 720 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 2560 x 1440 3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160 |
PS5 games run FSR 1.0 (now RSR) there's no reason it can't do this, too. Forspoken is a PS5 title!
Could be marketing, gives me vibes when people thought PS5 wouldn't get FSR 1.0 but then Arcadegeddon and Riftbreaker both dropped with FSR lol. Both consoles use capable AMD hardware, both consoles will get it.
Oh ok.
The game already has 2 upscaling methods, why not a third lmao.
Numbers are bit different than DLSS 2.0, i believe quality mode for 1080p is a bit higher than 720p.
I doubt Sony's devs will use this in any compacity. They seem keen on using CBR or Insomniac's temporal injection method.
Continues to look really, really impressive. As others said, we have to see it in motion though.From that article:
Absolutely. Clean up that performance mode, maybe we could get more fps out of quality mode. Wishful thinking probably.
Sony devs absolutely do. On PC at least we know some of their engines has support for it so I don't see why they wouldn't adopt it for PS5 games.
GIven the AA quality of FSR 2.0 (if it is effective as it seems) that can do a lot for the performance mode.
I'm not referring to only first party PS devs and it should be useful for PC ports
DLSS is hands down the best TAA solution right now, a lot of games simply have shit TAA and DLSS just replacing it alone is a bonus.
Yeah it's the second time it happens (and some people still "think" PS5 is custom RDNA 1.0).
Most PlayStation games on PC are using both DLSS and FSR.
