• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Who's Going to Win South Carolina?

  • Joe Biden

    Votes: 585 39.2%
  • Bernie Sanders

    Votes: 853 57.2%
  • Elizabeth Warren

    Votes: 24 1.6%
  • Pete Buttigieg

    Votes: 7 0.5%
  • THE KLOBBERER

    Votes: 16 1.1%
  • Tom Steyer

    Votes: 6 0.4%

  • Total voters
    1,491
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pwnz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,279
Places
LOL, Buttibutt won.

I told you guys Iowa doesn't matter. Ron Paul and Frothy Santorum were neck and neck with Mittens in 2012. It's a circus.
 

RedVejigante

Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,669
The most frustrating part of republicans doing their victory lap about this mess is that they themselves have had their own history of fuck-ups and accusations of conspiracy when it comes to the Iowa caucus, but of course short political memories will treat this as a purely democrat issue.
 

Jeff6851

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
753
User banned (1 week): Ignoring staff post
LOL, Buttibutt won.

I told you guys Iowa doesn't matter. Ron Paul and Frothy Santorum were neck and neck with Mittens in 2012. It's a circus.

62% of the results in does not equal a win

The Democrats are doing exactly what they did in 2016. Very visibly trying to make it seem like Sanders isn't popular then can whine when his supporters don't run to them in the general.
 

Kusagari

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,550
At least based off CNN, the narrative seems to be far more focused on Biden's flop than Pete's "win."
 

Gwenpoolshark

Member
Jan 5, 2018
4,109
The Pool
User banned (1 week): Ignoring staff post
62% of the results in does not equal a win

The Democrats are doing exactly what they did in 2016. Very visibly trying to make it seem like Sanders isn't popular then can whine when his supporters don't run to them in the general.

I think this time it's even more blatant though. In part because he has a better chance of actually winning.
 

Afrikan

Member
Oct 28, 2017
17,047
62% of the results in does not equal a win

The Democrats are doing exactly what they did in 2016. Very visibly trying to make it seem like Sanders isn't popular then can whine when his supporters don't run to them in the general.

yeah... so far 62%

total votes
Bernie 27,088 votes
Pete 23,666 votes
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,367
I can't take the results seriously considering what happened and the conflict of interest.

you won't take the full results seriously when they're reported because of "what happened" and a conflict of interest, even though everything connected to the app is irrelevant because they're going through and hand-counting the paper tallies instead of using the app?
 

Shaun Solo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,079
How much of an affect do yall think that last Iowa poll that had Pete in third behind Sanders and Warren getting cancelled had on the final vote? Enough to eke out a delegate win for Pete? Non-factor?
 

Slader166

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,320
Phoenix, AZ
TmWqwxq.png


So, what do I win?
 

thePopaShots

Member
Nov 27, 2017
1,689
Seems crazy to me that they are not releasing data on a percent level with the info they do have out, especially with people questioning the process. I'm sure almost every precinct had at least one person take a picture of the vote tally's, and it would go a long way to quieting those who think anything nefarious was going on.
 

Deleted member 21709

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
23,310
Now tell us how they somehow rigged this in favor of Pete.

I didn't say it was rigged. I just see a conflict of interest.

you won't take the full results seriously when they're reported because of "what happened" and a conflict of interest, even though everything connected to the app is irrelevant because they're going through and hand-counting the paper tallies instead of using the app?

Fine, Pete won. I don't know why I didn't expect Pete to win.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,367
How much of an affect do yall think that last Iowa poll that had Pete in third behind Sanders and Warren getting cancelled had on the final vote? Enough to eke out a delegate win for Pete? Non-factor?

Non-factor, because aside from "people who were planning to go to caucus 48 hours later but only decide based on what this specific poll says" is not a statistically significant group, anyone who is that easily swayed would be open to persuasion/peer pressure in the actual caucus.
 
OP
OP
Poodlestrike

Poodlestrike

Smooth vs. Crunchy
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
13,504
Haven't really been following along but why do you say that?
So, basically, the way this would typically go down is that Pete would be presented as the come-from-behind winner of Iowa, which is a very good thing to be. Polls have been showing Sanders winning, Pete falling off, everybody in the media would go gaga for him all over again, huge rush of donors, all that.

Instead, the headlines are mostly about the caucuses being a mess. No shiny media spotlight. Toss in the fact that a significant portion of the twitterverse is doing their best to tie Pete's campaign to the app and its developers, and like... this has done him absolutely no favors. Might have killed any shot he had, frankly, which was never much.
I didn't say it was rigged. I just see a conflict of interest.
The thing for me is that this whole mess seems to have hurt him. Hard to argue a conflict of interest like this when it works against you.
That shit's just cruel.
 

Kintaro

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,331
This seems like such horseshit, been stuck at 62% for 2.5 hours (24hrs after the actual elections). It seems like the Iowa Democratic Party is trying to paint a picture of Buttigieg winning for as long as possible before Bernie over takes. All the news outlets keep mentioning Buttigieg winning without really mentioning that they results are meaningless at the moment.
 
Oct 26, 2017
10,499
UK
I didn't say it was rigged. I just see a conflict of interest.

Please stop pushing wild conspiracy theories just because conflicts of interest just so happen to be one of the foundations of corruption in business/politics.

Next you'll be telling us that the US aid to Venezuela was in fact illegal, Guaido has had meetings recently with the far right, and that there was actually a coup in Bolivia.
 

Deleted member 21709

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
23,310
Please stop pushing wild conspiracy theories just because conflict of interest just so happen to be one of the foundations of corruption in business/politics.

Next you'll be telling us that the US aid to Venezuela was in fact illegal, Guaido has had meetings recently with the far right, and that there was actually a coup in Bolivia.

That last tweet you posted implies a devious plan though.

It's not really a conspiracy theory if you can clearly see the contradiction in the tweets, no? But I really don't want to derail the thread. I learned about the original tweet in this very same thread yesterday - so it isn't new to this conversation.
 

Shaun Solo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,079
Non-factor, because aside from "people who were planning to go to caucus 48 hours later but only decide based on what this specific poll says" is not a statistically significant group, anyone who is that easily swayed would be open to persuasion/peer pressure in the actual caucus.
Yeah, that makes sense.
 

strikeselect

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,131
Pete is basically a younger Biden without the gaffes. Bernie and Warren are taking each other's votes, one of them will need to drop if Pete continues to gain momentum.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,367
Please stop pushing wild conspiracy theories just because conflict of interest just so happen to be one of the foundations of corruption in business/politics.

what are the actual mechanisms of this, bearing in mind that the app is now out of the picture? would you qualify Pete buying a mass texting software from the company last year as more of a conflict of interest than, say, Bernie complaining about Jeff Bezos while his campaign was making tons of purchases from Amazon dot com?
 

Rockets

Member
Sep 12, 2018
3,015
Incredible. Just incredible. We likely won't see 100% of the vote till tomorrow or Thursday and now media coverage will run with the 62% and set the narrative with it. Jfc
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,367
Incredible. Just incredible. We likely won't see 100% of the vote till tomorrow or Thursday and now media coverage will run with the 62% and set the narrative with it. Jfc

do you think they're not going to report the final totals. do you think it's not going to come up going into new hampshire. do you think the candidate who won is not going to talk about. folks keep being all "the narrative this" "the narrative that" seem to think the next primary is tonight or something.
 

shoyz

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
531
If Bernie wins the popular vote and the actual state delegates get split evenly between them (a tie), I'm a bit confused on how SDEs can make it a 'win' for Buttigieg.
 

Xx 720

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,920
Buttigeg is clearly the centrist front-runner candidate of the party for centrist/Hillary wing of the Dems who were unwilling to bite the bullet on Biden, which is logical since Biden has run a crappy campaign. Buttigeg appeals to the older, boomer, let's just go back to the way things were, centrist/Hillary Clinton voter, who thinks Sanders and Warren are too far left and Klobuchar is too far right. He's polling with minority voters is atrocious though. If he wins the nomination, I can see a repeat of the Hillary campaign in that he wins the popular vote but fails to win the electoral college because turnout isn't as big as Dems hoped. I'm hoping Sanders runs away with it, though, which, admittedly, presents a whole other set of challenges, particularly Americans' negative view of socialism despite liking socialist policies.
I see stuff like this but in reality the "minority vote" was rock solid for Hillary in that last election?? Why is it framed like somehow minority vote saves the party from old school centrism, but in reality it killed Sanders, left us with Hillary and ultimately we ended up with Trump winning the election.
 

Ecotic

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,408
In terms of electability I see a fork in the road with like 5 bad options. Each path looks dark and gloomy in its own unique way. I really can't make sense of who I want to win right now. Biden better find his stride in South Carolina because he may very well be the nominee and he's looking lethargic as hell like there's little fight in him.
 

Odrion

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,148
do you think they're not going to report the final totals. do you think it's not going to come up going into new hampshire. do you think the candidate who won is not going to talk about. folks keep being all "the narrative this" "the narrative that" seem to think the next primary is tonight or something.
do you expect the media to not be completely dysfunctional?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.