Yep! They can exist as a benefit to PlayStation also without just bringing straight sales. Another solid first party game is a benefit to the system overall. Also, let's not get it twisted...I still think even with the reviews that this game will sell wellThe development started out with Bend being a small team, about 60 afaik.
Only to finish up did they increase to a 130-ish size studio, which is still quite reasonable.
The game will do just fine in terms of ROI imo.
As a new IP? Time will tell.
$60 is a lot to expect everyone to pay for a game day 1 to find out for themselves if they're gonna end up liking it or not, review aggregates serve a purpose, if someone is gonna buy a limited number of games in a month, i'm sure many would rather spend their money on something less risky.
but yeah, once a game has been out for a while and prices have dropped and there are tons of impressions online or from friends, more people are likely to buy a game even if the initial critical reception wasn't very good.
exactly, i don't know where this narrative that a 70 for a AAA game is a good or average score is coming from, it's like people are pretending reviewers are using the whole 1-10 scale, when that's just not true. ~70 score is basically the minimum acceptable score for a AAA game for it to not be considered "critically panned".
there was also the big worldwide preview tour. the game had a decent marketing budget.
It's been on social media since like january/February. None stop.
I would actually say 70 for an AAA game, is actually pretty bad. You want at least an 80.exactly, i don't know where this narrative that a 70 for a AAA game is a good or average score is coming from, it's like people are pretending reviewers are using the whole 1-10 scale, when that's just not true. ~70 score is basically the minimum acceptable score for a AAA game for it to not be considered "critically panned".
there was also the big worldwide preview tour. the game had a decent marketing budget.
That is an impressive attention to detail.
I think a 8.2 / 10 is a solid score for this game.. I'm enjoying the hell out of it
God damn, nice. Graphics is one department I'm not worried about when it comes to this game.
God damn, nice. Graphics is one department I'm not worried about when it comes to this game.
marketing is WAY more than just TV ads, there's youtube ads, ads in gaming websites, advertisement in retailers, all of those aren't cheap and are part of the marketing budget.The marketing spend is TV advertisements and that started in April, 20 days prior to launch.
I bet! Looking forward to checking it out myself on that sexy oled. I heard the HDR implementation is pretty well done as well which is nice.
It's my favorite game of this year. I gave it a 9/10. Now I'm waiting for more DLCs.
It's funny you say that. Alex made that comparison on the giant beastcast.I just watched the QL and it kinda falls into that same vein as Mad Max more than I thought it did. A solid 7 game that would be fun for like 20-30 bucks.
marketing is WAY more than just TV ads, there's youtube ads, ads in gaming websites, advertisement in retailers, all of those aren't cheap and are part of the marketing budget.
Going to say this right now: Deacon is perhaps the most realistic looking protagonist during pure gameplay segments right up there if not a touch better than Nathan Drake in U4 on consoles.
Whether that comes at a cost to environmental detail given the LoD issues and general pop-ins, I am unsure, but to have attained that level of shader fidelity in an open world game is feat of artistry and engineering.
I do wonder how Arthur Morgan's character looks during gameplay (presumably it is also very close given the overall staggering fidelity and unequivocally much better LoD streaming system for the overall environment).
Incredible!full agree i-Lo nice ingame capture ;) this game amaze me OMFG
Honestly it reads as a situation of "the oven doesn't want it". It had enough time, budget, care.
Honestly I guess you're right in a way. Sony clearly gave bend studios a lot of time to make it and delayed it numerous times. I guess days gone just wasn't meant to be :(Honestly it reads as a situation of "the oven doesn't want it". It had enough time, budget, care.
full agree i-Lo nice ingame capture ;) this game amaze me OMFG
Absolutely fantastic. That said, I tend to avoid photomode shots for showing off graphics given they sometimes enhance shader quality and detail. If you have any close up gameplay shots of Deacon, please share if and when you have time.
It is a shame about the pop-in and other bugs. The world without those kinds of issues would have been a technical benchmark for open world Sony published games.
Graphically, this game is a powerhouse! Deacon's character model I find to be more detailed than Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4 and Kratos in God of War. The environment is equally detailed and the texture work is bar-none the best I've seen on the PS4 Pro. Having frame dips here and there is a common occurrence in open world games, so I really don't care about that - but graphically I would say this is one of, if not the best looking PS4 Pro games I've seen.
Also the weather effects are some of the best I've seen - at least equal to Red Dead Redemption and Red Dead Redemption 2 and maybe even a little better.
Incredible!full agree i-Lo nice ingame capture ;) this game amaze me OMFG
Graphically, this game is a powerhouse! Deacon's character model I find to be more detailed than Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4 and Kratos in God of War. The environment is equally detailed and the texture work is bar-none the best I've seen on the PS4 Pro. Having frame dips here and there is a common occurrence in open world games, so I really don't care about that - but graphically I would say this is one of, if not the best looking PS4 Pro games I've seen.
Also the weather effects are some of the best I've seen - at least equal to Red Dead Redemption and Red Dead Redemption 2 and maybe even a little better.[/diveTE]
Thanks for the impressions. Can't wait to get home after work and dive in.
Have you played the game yet or is this based on reviews?Honestly I guess you're right in a way. Sony clearly gave bend studios a lot of time to make it and delayed it numerous times. I guess days gone just wasn't meant to be :(
A damn shame to be honest. This is one of the weakest first party game in a long time
You can fuck all the way off with that
Decent for sure. But there's a distinction between GOW/COD?Spiderman Type marketing budgets and Days Gone. A distinction that should be clear. A 20 day add buy in April is far easier to recoup.
As it should. Social media adds from a social media giant cost what exactly? This is in game footage we're talking about, uploaded to their own social media accounts. It's social media that spreads the footage via likes, shares etc? The marketing spend is TV advertisements and that started in April, 20 days prior to launch. Sure sony marketed this game but this sin't a Fifa/COD type of ad buy. I'd call it modest at best.
Yeah I've played the game
I meant paid for social media advertising. Not sony's own channel. Like i scroll down instagram and its none stop days gone, same for a lot of people I know. That's not free marketing.