Nah, Nanocell is their LED line. They also use IPS displays instead of VA displays so they have good viewing angles. I've heard mixed things about them.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
CES 2020 - leaks, rumors and what to expect (Sony, AMD, Nvidia, Intel, etc)
- Thread starter Earvin Infinity
- Start date
It's name is, but it's just a standard LED technology used. Some of them were using Quantum Dots, but they refuse to say anymore
'NanoCell' is a marketing term from LG, just like 'QLED' from Samsung, they're just LCD displays with added technologies.
OLED is a different type of display and is generally much better than everything on the market in terms of display picture quality and form factor (very thin).
It would be no problem if they can pass full audio via ARC, but not many TVs do.
Basically they took a shot at other tv brands that used filters with standard backlights (dual panels), then at OLED, then announced their own Vidrian Mini LED tech (minileds directly fused into the backlight).
With the way they took a shot at OLED... I guess they are not gonna go through with their Quantum DOT OLED TV.
From March
How much money do you have? Samsung can create a screen for you no problem...
You would be saying the same about OLED, if LG didn't stick with it (while Sony and Samsung bailed) and find a way to make it affordable. They took the chance and are getting rewarded for it.
MicroLED seems too expensive still. LG does have section for it at their huge booth.
Hisense announced their new line up of 2020 TV's but I am not clear if any of them have HDMI 2.1 with VRR. It looks like maybe the H9G Quantum which is the newer model of the H9F is going to have 120 hz native display. I am hoping that it has HDMI 2.1 with VRR.
Right now it is incredibly expensive because they need to put each micro pixel one by one. Given time and better manufacturing methods, it might become cheaper.
I am struggling to resist buying a RTX 2080 Super because I'm not sure if a better card that isn't a Ti will be released this year...
Damn...thanks for letting me know!
That's comical coming from a company who's panels are pretty bad (TCL 6 owner here).
I'm not an expert in calculating video signal bit rates, but I don't believe so, it will be compressed to 4:2:0 and likely 8 bit (no HDR?) I think 10bit, 4:2:0, 120Hz is beyond 18Gbps. That said it's still a great feature add and much better than nothing.
I fortunately already have a C9 to work with (just want to run an HDMI cable through the wall to have it attached to my desktop PC monitor too), but I meant something more along the lines of like a sub $500 4k 120/144Hz monitor.
Really? I hear tons of praise for them for the quality you get for the price you pay.
Very excited to see what AMD will show us today. It has been a while since there was competition on the CPU market, hopefully they can also have a fair chance at disrupting the GPU market.
Haha yeah im not loaded, but it just seems we've heard so long ago about this "holy grail" of tv, It seems weird to me theres still no viable manufacturing process to make this technology commercially available.
SED was like the nuclear fusion of TV. It was the holy grail of TV and was worked on for over 20 years before it was finally abandoned. Sometimes great technology just can't be produced. It's a little early to be worried about things, though. Still, be prepared for the possibility it never fulfills the promises.
If they solve the yet-unsolved issue of having to pay each pixel manually, high. If not, chances will be 0