• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pedrito

Member
Nov 4, 2017
2,369
If the Cons win the most seats, but the Libs and NDP form a coalition, would you say it's a #Kudatah ?
 

StevieP

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,278
We are the canary in the coal mine folks.

Elderly population, no steady or high wage work, high taxes, chronically underfunded by our provincial government, no family doctors, ambulances not running or available for hours at a time. 2 year waiting times to get mental health. The first responders here can't even get mental healthcare, after seeing people getting scraped off highways. The city is broke and fighting/suing the mainland provincial government every few years so that the bills get paid.



They would keep Alberta alive, which many of us travel to for work. Beyond that, they would cut the tax out of the price of home heating oil. Which directly effects everybody here that depends on welfare, living in slum conditions; people dependent on oil furnaces that would save a few hundred bucks per winter. Oil that is delivered at $200 minimums. We don't use natural gas here. They would cut red tape and let the skilled workforce that went to Alberta to stay and work locally in resource extraction projects if they ever got off the ground. Little things that matter, lost in the big ideological bullshit arguments.

Any change at all would be better than Liberal. We now have a separatist movement looking to become a territory, just to get away from the mainland's poor provincial government.

Perhaps instead of complete dependence on oil and resource extraction you could vote in a party that's looking in a completely different direction. What's happening in Alberta is destroying the planet, and you wouldn't want MORE of it if you're ever planning on procreation or living till you're old.
 

ContraWars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,517
Canada
User Warned: Derogatory Language
That will be Ontario within 3 years time.

I think I will blame the Federal government for this.

I don't dispute that. Doug Ford's government has become what we maritimers would still casually curse at and call out as, despite being contemporarily inappropriate; "Retarded"

He's cutting when his problem is revenue. NS Liberals cut subsidies to programs that generated revenue, and then they bust unions, and blame the previous NDP or Conservative provincial governments. Magically, they find the budget for big promises each election year.

Federal government blame here from me falls on it being all Liberal here, in and out of government since 1980, a 4 year shot for a PC seat and NDP seat back in the 80s and 90s. All Liberal otherwise. 40 years of Liberals for most of what is now the one riding. 1 in 3 kids here are in poverty, drug addicts roam around and hustle in plain sight, there is no funding for any services.
 

Kernel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,897
I don't dispute that. Doug Ford's government has become what we maritimers would still casually curse at and call out as, despite being contemporarily inappropriate; "Retarded"

Yeah he's literally destroying the province.

He's cutting when his problem is revenue. NS Liberals cut subsidies to programs that generated revenue, and then they bust unions, and blame the previous NDP or Conservative provincial governments. Magically, they find the budget for big promises each election year.

Federal government blame here from me falls on it being all Liberal here, in and out of government since 1980, a 4 year shot for a PC seat and NDP seat back in the 80s and 90s. All Liberal otherwise. 40 years of Liberals for most of what is now the one riding. 1 in 3 kids here are in poverty, drug addicts roam around and hustle in plain sight, there is no funding for any services.

Thanks for the perspective.

That sounds like Ford is doing. He magically found the money to give themselves 14% raises too.
 

WolfeTone

Member
Oct 25, 2017
611
My biggest fear about this election is apathy and low turnout. In 2015, people (young people in particular), were hyped to get out and vote for Trudeau. I see none of that enthusiasm this time around and I anticipate that many people won't bother voting. I believe people prefer to vote for someone, rather than against someone, and unfortunately this election cycle has been focused on negativity, lies, and personal attacks.

Personally I hope that the Liberals can stay in power with strong showings in Ontario and Québec, but the pessimist in me is quite worried.
 

ContraWars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,517
Canada
Scheer should promise a buck a beer, then work on scandalous corporate welfare deals to federally distribute Lucky Lager for a buck a can.

Give us all the greatest collective hangover of all time.
 

BY2K

Membero Americo
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
4,686
Québec, Canada
My biggest fear about this election is apathy and low turnout. In 2015, people (young people in particular), were hyped to get out and vote for Trudeau. I see none of that enthusiasm this time around and I anticipate that many people won't bother voting. I believe people prefer to vote for someone, rather than against someone, and unfortunately this election cycle has been focused on negativity, lies, and personal attacks.

Personally I hope that the Liberals can stay in power with strong showings in Ontario and Québec, but the pessimist in me is quite worried.

Didn't this election get the biggest turnout at anticipation voting in like, ever?
 
Oct 31, 2017
4,333
Unknown
Perhaps instead of complete dependence on oil and resource extraction you could vote in a party that's looking in a completely different direction. What's happening in Alberta is destroying the planet, and you wouldn't want MORE of it if you're ever planning on procreation or living till you're old.
Yeah.
Greens have said and are committed to a massive retrofitting plan for homes.
As well as development of local green energy projects for all regions suited to the region.
 

ContraWars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,517
Canada
Perhaps instead of complete dependence on oil and resource extraction you could vote in a party that's looking in a completely different direction. What's happening in Alberta is destroying the planet, and you wouldn't want MORE of it if you're ever planning on procreation or living till you're old.

We only vote in Liberals. They accomplish nothing. They killed our coal industry, replaced it with Paul Martin's own imports of coal. We followed Newfoundland that lost the fishery, to Alberta. Now Liberals are trying to kill Alberta too. If there was anything viable, go for it. In the mean time we need to worry about keeping people working here.

We are already getting old. We are already procreating. The kids are growing up in under-employment and welfare conditions, many turning into unskilled NEETs well into their late 20s.
 
Oct 31, 2017
4,333
Unknown

Yes, go ahead and lol at legitimate Canadian security concerns involving foreign relations.

There is evidence he does hang out with and support Khalistan sympathizers who celebrate and honour terrorists.


Last fall, days after he'd been elected leader of the NDP, Jagmeet Singh appeared on CBC's Power & Politics for an interview with host Terry Milewski. At the end of the interview, Milewski repeatedly asked Singh to denounce the recent veneration of Talwinder Singh Parmar, architect of the 1985 Air India bombing, at some Sikh temples in Canada.

In this interview, some saw a vigorous journalistic exercise that was far more useful than the usual softballs lobbed at newly-minted political leaders. Members of a well-meaning Twitter mob saw Milewski, a white man, grill the decidedly non-white Singh on matters of religion and violence and loudly assumed racism.

World Sikh Organization executive Jaskaran Sandhu said Milewski's questions were nothing short of "racist" and "bigoted." Media critic and Canadaland publisher Jesse Brown said Milewski committed "racial discrimination." Singh himself said there was a "clear, problematic line" in Milewski's questioning, and suggested Milewski himself was racist. (Full disclosure: I appear regularly on Power & Politics.)

Loud as hell just six months ago, Milewski's critics, as well as Singh himself, are suddenly quiet in the wake of the news, unearthed this week by the Globe and Mail, that Singh attended a rally in San Francisco in 2015 honouring Sikh separatist Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.

Whether Bhindranwale is a terrorist or freedom fighter depends entirely on one's view of India's religious history of the 1980s, when the issue of Sikh separatism was at its height. This much is certain, however: Bhindranwale and his supporters were well-armed and indulged in often deadly violence against Hindus and Sikhs alike. And in 2015, when he was an Ontario MPP, Jagmeet Singh was all in, using the occasion to denounce India's "genocide" and voice his desire for a separate Sikh homeland.

Singh's presence at this rally is worrisome for a number of reasons. It calls into question Singh's own contention, mouthed during the interview with Milewski interview, that his activism — indeed, his very identity — was based entirely on peace between Hindus and Sikhs.

In fact, Singh's own spiel at the rally removes this rather small fig leaf altogether.

Speaking to the crowd, Singh said wearing a turban and Kirpan in Ontario's Parliament was an act of spite that would "show the Indian government that 'look we are here," he told the crowd, to raucous applause. Does he regret this today? Hard to say, as Singh wouldn't answer the Globe and Mail's questions on the matter. (Singh later released a statement saying he attended the rally as a "human rights activist.")



Maybe if there was more media scrutiny of this Jagmeet Singh candidate people wouldn't just believe the facade of "Cool dude" that stands up for minorities.
Is that Brampton candidate kicked out of the party yet? Or is it just another indigenous person and who cares?
People seem to care more about anti-Muslim racist comments than comments against indigenous people.


To know where a politician's priorities really are a person should look at what they do and who and what they stand for outside the campaign, in politics and in their private lives.
 

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
We only vote in Liberals. They accomplish nothing. They killed our coal industry, replaced it with Paul Martin's own imports of coal. We followed Newfoundland that lost the fishery, to Alberta. Now Liberals are trying to kill Alberta too. If there was anything viable, go for it. In the mean time we need to worry about keeping people working here.

We are already getting old. We are already procreating. The kids are growing up in under-employment and welfare conditions, many turning into unskilled NEETs well into their late 20s.
You confuse Provincial politics with Federal politics
 

StevieP

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,278
I don't dispute that. Doug Ford's government has become what we maritimers would still casually curse at and call out as, despite being contemporarily inappropriate; "Retarded"

He's cutting when his problem is revenue. NS Liberals cut subsidies to programs that generated revenue, and then they bust unions, and blame the previous NDP or Conservative provincial governments. Magically, they find the budget for big promises each election year.

Federal government blame here from me falls on it being all Liberal here, in and out of government since 1980, a 4 year shot for a PC seat and NDP seat back in the 80s and 90s. All Liberal otherwise. 40 years of Liberals for most of what is now the one riding. 1 in 3 kids here are in poverty, drug addicts roam around and hustle in plain sight, there is no funding for any services.

If there is something conservative governments are known for, it's certainly not austerity and more cuts, while giving tax breaks to those who are already doing fine. Best of luck to you with your choice of something federally that is wrong provincially.
 

2pac_71

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,517
The thing about Scheer is I bet a ton of conservatives will hear him say that and believe it and then spread it. this may be bias on my part but I swear conservatives and right wing people spread way more lies and misinformation and are more dishonest then the left in general. I can't handle conservatives at all. And I'm in Alberta. it sucks.
 

ContraWars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,517
Canada
You confuse Provincial politics with Federal politics

I do not confuse either of them.

Federally we have been fucked by getting nothing, despite being Federally Liberal for 40 years. The Federal crown corp that ran our coal here was shuttered by the Federal Liberals 20 years ago and the decline is still ravaging the place. Provincially we have been Liberal for 6 years so far, NSNDP before that for a single term. Taxes went up. Now unions were busted and the healthcare slid off a cliff into crisis. NS Liberals also gutted support for programs that helped the film industry get footing in NS. The whole place has gone to shit on Liberal watch.

If there is something conservative governments are known for, it's certainly not austerity and more cuts, while giving tax breaks to those who are already doing fine. Best of luck to you with your choice of something federally that is wrong provincially.

I don't see a difference. Worst case, you're right. We still get fucking nothing out of the federal government. Either way, Liberals should lose here and stop taking it for granted, especially by propping up a disgraceful fucking clown like Jaime Battiste, or even Justin Trudeau himself.

Seriously. Put Garneau in the PMO, and it's likely the Red Tory Conservative support would evaporate and condense on the outside of the big Red tent again. The polarizing bullshit would be less front and center. We could all get on with our lives.
 
Last edited:

Tiktaalik

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,429
I don't understand what you're wishing for to happen in these tight Lib/Conservative ridings. If some of these people take the risk you want, wouldn't the Conservatives win those ridings?

Maybe some bad wording on my part here.

So long as Canada has FPTP strategic voting is baked into our system and it can make sense. If you're in a tight Lib/Conservative riding where the Conservatives genuinely have a very strong chance of winning honestly it makes sense go right ahead and strategically vote for Lib even if you may favour Green/NDP.

However there's plenty of ridings where the NDP do pretty well and Conservatives are a diminished threat. Here I'm suggesting I'd love to see people take the risk if they'd rather vote for the NDP than strategically.

Vancouver Centre IMO is one of those. Liberal MP Hedy Fry continuously wins in part due to incumbency and people strategically voting, but she's an awful MP. Conservatives are a factor, but it's not neck and neck or anything. Meanwhile in this election the NDP are ahead of the Liberals in BC polling and the NDP candidate for Vancouver Centre seems like a good choice. I'd love to see NDP get elected here. I think it's possible.

Singh again being disingenuous. If it's that important make it a mandate for a coalition or stop fucking talking about it. Wonder why that isn't there? Oh yeah, cause he doesn't want his party to take the hit. Wow, such a good guy. Besides that, provincially, where the NDP have at least gotten power sometimes, why has pr not been passed? 🤔. You constantly keep trying to show Singh is so great yet don't like to be critical of him.

I don't think Singh, if he's propping up a minority government, has the mandate from voters to demand PR. It hasn't honestly been a big part of this election.

Trudeau had that mandate in 2015 and threw it away.
 

Tiktaalik

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,429
I strongly believe that if a minority gouv gets elected we're going right back in election mode.

You may be surprised. The BC minority government has been pretty low drama over the last two years, and the government even has a zero margin for error seat count.

The NDP / Green agreement has been pretty successful and I have no reason to expect it won't last the whole 4 years until the next fixed election date.
 

DopeyFish

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,796
We only vote in Liberals. They accomplish nothing. They killed our coal industry, replaced it with Paul Martin's own imports of coal. We followed Newfoundland that lost the fishery, to Alberta. Now Liberals are trying to kill Alberta too. If there was anything viable, go for it. In the mean time we need to worry about keeping people working here.

We are already getting old. We are already procreating. The kids are growing up in under-employment and welfare conditions, many turning into unskilled NEETs well into their late 20s.

or maybe you should try

i dunno

diversifying the economy instead of relying on oil?

you know what toronto did and why it's the biggest booming cities in the west? DIVERSIFYING. Toronto used to be THE industrial hub. that's it. 1950s the city was basically where edmonton is now. Industry started it's slow demise so what did they do? They specialized the local economy. Industry is still moving out but industry isn't what drives the city any more. They're now laying the groundwork for a tech district on old industrial land. The city used to be old and crummy and even in the 90s growth completely flatlined. By diversifying, you start creating increasing pressure on other industries to keep up. (because of growth)

Albertans identification as a people should not be oil. Be something greater. Get ahead of the curve and fix the issues in a dynamic environment and shield yourself from economic downturns. Toronto, the industrial city, hog town. Now a hotbed for software engineering, medical, bio engineering, artificial intelligence, finance and many different subcategories. Growth has led to incredibly high demand for trades.

That's why you don't go all in on one thing. You target every possible industry you can. You support it with strong colleges and universities to allow specialist training and then you make it appealing for specialists to stay.

Now as to your blame towards the liberals... the only reason Alberta is currently in dire straights lies solely at the feet of OPEC and Alberta's unwillingness to diversify and nobody else. Shale oil isn't profitable at current oil prices. Them flooding the market with oil made shale extraction unprofitable. Alberta being fucked because they keep doubling down on a single damn thing is their own fault.

Blaming the liberals for Alberta's issues is pretty much like blaming Obama because you spilled your drink because you were balancing it on your finger while the drink was being poured with everyone around you telling you it wasn't a good idea and you should stop.
 

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
I do not confuse either of them.

Federally we have been fucked by getting nothing, despite being Federally Liberal for 40 years. The Federal crown corp that ran our coal here was shuttered by the Federal Liberals 20 years ago and the decline is still ravaging the place. Provincially we have been Liberal for 6 years so far, NSNDP before that for a single term. Taxes went up. Now unions were busted and the healthcare slid off a cliff into crisis. NS Liberals also gutted support for programs that helped the film industry get footing in NS. The whole place has gone to shit on Liberal watch.
what has the 9 years of Mulroney given you? what has the 9 years of Harper done for you?

your post makes no sense. You pin the misery on Atlantic Canada only on the Liberals but you ignore the disastrous recession of the Mulroney era and the hands off era of Harper era
 
Status
Not open for further replies.