Looks cool and all, but my god just call these games like Animus: Valhalla. Its just an insult considering these to be Assassins Creed games, really bums me out because it used to be my favorite series until they went Witcher Lite.
I wonder if there will be any large cities that can be explored? Large cities were always more interesting to explore vs open fields to me in these games.
My #1 theory for the story will be that there will be a clash between Eivor's culture and the creed of assassins.
England at this time didn't have a ton of large cities since it's still the Dark Ages. The only one that will approach the scale of cities in the past two games will be Winchester unless they have a large city in the Norway portion.
The actual game will look a lot better than a poor quality video. Odyssey is still one of the best looking games on current gen.Assassin's Creed Valhalla looks really terrible. Especially since it's designed for 30fps on next gen consoles. I didn't expect it to look this bad.
Gameplay looks boring as fuck. What a mess. Hard pass.
It's on the same level If not better than W3 I'd say.Understand it's not going to be able to look like something like TLOU because they're different kinds of games. But to me it looks worse than similar games that are years old like the Witcher 3 on console. But maybe I'm remembering wrong.
Man, those character models... Eivor looks really cool in the promo art, less so in the game
Yes, true, but everything else has gone on to betray that promise of a "blade in the crowd." Vikings aren't exactly know for their stealth skills.
Yes, true, but everything else has gone on to betray that promise of a "blade in the crowd." Vikings aren't exactly know for their stealth skills.
Same here, I really wish they could recapture the intrigue of the first games with the present day timeline, I literally have no clue what the f the current present day timeline is about even though I finished Odyssey like two months ago, yet I know exactly everything that happened with Desmond and what they were trying to prevent. It's wishful thinking that they'll ever go back to that, at least there was a time when AC games had a bunch of unique elements compared to the games released at that time.Looks cool and all, but my god just call these games like Animus: Valhalla. Its just an insult considering these to be Assassins Creed games, really bums me out because it used to be my favorite series until they went Witcher Lite.
Yeah, but then where are those negative feedback then? Cant find it on the internetMany people= influencers/youtubers/streamers that wouldn´t say a negative thing to a preview from a big publisher at all because they don´t want to risk not getting any preview build copies anymore and are basically modern advertisers?
While I think it makes sense after what, 12+ games (?), I agree. I think they should split the series into two. One for the "blade in the crowd" and one for these last three games. There are still a lot of locations left that would fit the gameplay of the first few games.Yes, true, but everything else has gone on to betray that promise of a "blade in the crowd." Vikings aren't exactly know for their stealth skills.
I watched the same video, and I think it looks good. I was initially on the fence, but the game looks interesting and the graphics are great.Man I watched other video... It is not possible. It looks really good the graphics. Odissey is one of the best graphics from this gen(PC version) and this new one looks incredible.
Thanks God AC doesn't depend of Era to sell well. Greg Miller video about the game is really good too, game is incredible:
We Played Assassin's Creed: Valhalla! - First Impressions
Greg and Barrett talk about everything they loved and not-so-much loved from their hands-on demo with Assassin's Creed: Valhalla!Subscribe! http://www.youtub...youtu.be
Did you really like Arno as a character though? To me he felt stale, bland, and tired. Like a poor man's attempt at a new Ezio.
That official footage somehow has worse quality than the press one...
I really like main character design, but those design didn't translate well into the game, even compare it to Odyssey early footage.
How they go from this
To this...
Lots of potential in Canterbury, York, and London too, being Roman cities. I think that's a good way for them to get around the large stone buildings issue (for parkour fun) and having them in various state of ruin would be fun for climbing too =)England at this time didn't have a ton of large cities since it's still the Dark Ages. The only one that will approach the scale of cities in the past two games will be Winchester unless they have a large city in the Norway portion.
Are these the worst faces in a Ubisoft game in recent memory? I played Origins not too long ago and I swear the models look overall much better than this crap.
Oswald's face is lol worthy.
I would say yes, if the faces in Watch Dogs Legion weren't worse, sadly.Are these the worst faces in a Ubisoft game in recent memory? I played Origins not too long ago and I swear the models look overall much better than this crap.
Oswald's face is lol worthy.
Man, those character models... Eivor looks really cool in the promo art, less so in the game
Wait a minute, I thought you can't wield a shield?
It was a dealbreaker for me.
Nah, I enjoy these "new school"-Assassin`s Creed-games. It´s just the technical execution in the trailer that worries me.in more ways than one. as the new 'assassin's creed - now 100% assassin free!' games continue to get progressively more tired, & tiresome, looking...
I really hope this this is indeed a work in progress, Kassandra set a high bar and to drop to this would be rough.
Looks cool and all, but my god just call these games like Animus: Valhalla. Its just an insult considering these to be Assassins Creed games, really bums me out because it used to be my favorite series until they went Witcher Lite.