did you saw it or are you talking about what you read ?
...was it leaked ? where can i find it ? =x
They didn't want to repeat stuff, it's obvious everything with Uncle Ben still happened and it has been since that scene Peter had with Tony in Civil War
Y'all act like they erased him from existence, he just doesn't need to be focused on rn. It's not like Peter thinks about Uncle Ben in every Spider-Man comic either
I love Squirrel Girl, but I did not need to see her done by the people who made Agents of SHIELD or the Netflix shows, all of which I found okay-to-unwatchable.
Yeah that was a dodged bullet. She will eventually show up. Now that everyone's getting a Disney+ show the chances are even greater.i don't doubt they would not do Squirrel Girl justice because it is a completely different tone, but saying SHIELD is "ok to unwatchable" is against the law in some countries.... it features some of the best seasons ever made by marvel and i am safe to say this without even finishing Falcon or watching loki
I give credit to Disney for being smart enough to leave it all to Marvel Studios to make creative decisions. Here's a blank check-go nuts.Extremely happy. Though I don't give credit to Disney, I credit the individual writers, actors, directors and Feige for tying everything together while simultaneously ensuring each movie retains it's own identify and feeling- something that was sorely lacking during Phase 1 and some of Phase 2 imo.
The only thing I don't like thus far are the stupid reactionary idiots online, the absolute flood of alt-right trolling, the weird Tobey Maguire army, the dummies that continue to think that "all Marvel will only be G-rated because Disney" despite all evidence to the contrary.
We've seen Peter mourn Uncle Ben in two films already. If Marvel had done that you would have people complaining that they spent too much time on Uncle Ben. Peter stanning Tony makes perfect sense in the MCU and as Far From Home shows, he now knows Tony was far from perfect. I will never buy this narrative that Peter is Tony Jr or that they've erased Uncle Ben. He is still Peter Parker in all the ways that matterIt's gotten to the point that Peter mourns Tony Stark more than Uncle Ben. Something is seriously wrong with this picture.
Peter stanning a billionaire is gross af. (And before someone mentions the Osborns, how does that tend to work out for Peter?)
This is such a funny sentence.
We've seen Peter mourn Uncle Ben in two films already. If Marvel had done that you would have people complaining that they spent too much time on Uncle Ben. Peter stanning Tony makes perfect sense in the MCU and as Far From Home shows, he now knows Tony was far from perfect. I will never buy this narrative that Peter is Tony Jr or that they've erased Uncle Ben. He is still Peter Parker in all the ways that matter
These movies aren't trying to give tribute to Uncle Ben. It should be understood.Into The Spider-Verse did a better job giving tribute to Uncle Ben than any MCU movie. This Peter also seems to have no money problems. And if you want to go into the supporting cast, we can, because they are unrecognizable.
This is a poor representation of Spider-Man and his world.
It's honestly baffling.You get the impression people just want every Spider-Man movie to be him mourning Uncle Ben every day of his life ad infinitum.
I definitely don't see this happen in the comics so I don't get where this is coming from.
Not repeating Uncle Ben's death for the third time was a fantastic decision. Everyone who watches the MCU movies knows how Peter got his powers and that he lost his uncle, imagine wasting an entire film just to do that whole song and dance again.
These movies aren't trying to give tribute to Uncle Ben. It should be understood.
We know he was a dumpster diver before Tony showed up. These are updated takes on the characters, calling them unrecognizable seems kinda disingenuous when they have been updated and diversified for a new audience and so that they aren't repeating the same dynamics we've already seen. It's only a poor representation if you think it has to be 1:1 faithful to the comics, which no MCU movie has been. Comic fans are usually more on board with adaptation changes but for some reason the MCU Spider-Man has some of y'all really tight. I hoped you said something when The Amazing Spider-Man films were trying to act like Peter's parents were ever important and implying he was destined to be Spider-Man, or when the Raimi films made his webs organic and yanked him right out of high school after an hour. Much more egregious choices than anything the MCU has done but yet, they are still enjoyable
It's really crazy.9 out 10 people thought Iron Man was a robot before the MCU. Now he's bigger than Superman.
That witches also shoot laser beams in the MCU is so funny lolI like some of them and will continue watching, but they're like McDonald's: tasty, but empty and ultimately not good for you. They are safe and unchallenging, factory-made. Feige doesn't have an eye for visual storytelling, but he does know how to cast a movie. WandaVision was an insult, an incredibly intriguing premise kneecapped by formula. Let's solve this woman's grief by....shooting laser beams?
I'm making an educated guess based on the quality of Marvel Television's output under Loeb, which was a completely separate and unrelated division to Feige's Marvel Studios. I love Squirrel Girl, but I did not need to see her done by the people who made Agents of SHIELD or the Netflix shows, all of which I found okay-to-unwatchable. New Warriors will be along eventually, handled by real pros this time.
Vulture, Mysterio, Tinkerer, having him actually Spider-Man in Queens, going to Europe, these movies are very much doing new things with the character that hasn't been done yet. You say you don't want a 1:1 adaptation but that what it sounds like to me. On the subject of Ned being like Ganke, Peter didn't know Ned in high school in the comics so that period in Ned's life is pretty much open to interpretation. Other than being on the heavier side and into LEGOs, that's all the similarities those two share and (that's pretty much all there is to Ganke's character rn anyway) I feel like even then it's overblown. He's also dated Betty in Far From Home, which is something accurate to the comics but people never want to bring upI did. I have frequently said how bad The Amazing Spider-Man films are. Not just as Spider-Man films, but as films in general.
I don't need a 1:1 comic adaptation, but I want a more accurate adaptation than one that takes Miles Morales' best friend, renames him after the fake Hobgoblin, and makes him Peter's BFF. There are ton of characters and stories that we have never seen in a Spider-Man film despite there being so many of them.
Vulture, Mysterio, Tinkerer, having him actually Spider-Man in Queens, going to Europe, these movies are very much doing new things with the character that hasn't been done yet. You say you don't want a 1:1 adaptation but that what it sounds like to me. On the subject of Ned being like Ganke, Peter didn't know Ned in high school in the comics so that period in Ned's life is pretty much open to interpretation. Other than being on the heavier side and into LEGOs, that's all the similarities those two share and (that's pretty much all there is to Ganke's character rn anyway) I feel like even then it's overblown. He's also dated Betty in Far From Home, which is something accurate to the comics but people never want to bring up
It's not some poor representation, it's just different
We've seen Peter mourn Uncle Ben in two films already. If Marvel had done that you would have people complaining that they spent too much time on Uncle Ben.
Personally, no, but I've been more of an X-Men and Spider-Man guy when it comes to Marvel and they've yet to do much with the former and I don't think they've done well with the latter.
I didn't like having Spiderman' story revolve around Iron Man and other paternal figures. He now is "Tony Stark's lil bitch". I think that in 4 movies + Endgame he says "mr. Stark" almost a hundred times.
I always saw him as an indipendent strongwilled kid/man... now he is a petulant appendix.
Yup. I would make an argument that Fox and Sony owning more of the recognizable characters helped them immensely as opposed to Star Wars, they could do things creatively without having to deal with the extra bullshit of that property. No one was going to organize an online mob of manbabies with torches over the characterization of Drax ("He was my fav character in my childhood and you ruined him, I hope your daughter dies"), or have high expectations of selling 3 million drax toys.
They have a universe runner with passion for the project, use talented writers/directors from the indie world, and really no built in audience expectation as far as storylines and characterization is concerned.
I didn't like having Spiderman' story revolve around Iron Man and other paternal figures. He now is "Tony Stark's lil bitch". I think that in 4 movies + Endgame he says "mr. Stark" almost a hundred times.
I always saw him as an indipendent strongwilled kid/man... now he is a petulant appendix.
My favorite thing in the world is the:
"Marvel so formulaic"
into
"Wheres my Uncle Ben formula!"
In any case its just a side effect of the success anyway. It's 'their' formula, and no one else is doing it right. Not even close, despite many copies. Im happy that it seems to have such a long runway ahead of it. Something like Xmen being able to bring in many lesser known mutants is going to benefit tremendously from it.
Into the Spider-Verse actually reused Cliff Robertson voice clips for Uncle Ben, and it is a much better film than either of the MCU Spider-Man films. By a fucking mile.
Would like to see some R-Rated content for the MCU.
I know Deadpool is coming, but I'm hoping will get more than just Deadpool.
Also, MCU still kinda suffers from poorly placed comedic moments from time to time.
I would be curious to see if they could ever make a MCU movie or show that doesn't rely on those type of emotional beats, and still do well.