Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 910

Oct 25, 2017
16,503
I think at the end of the day you have to stop and wonder if this is worth the hundreds of victims France is going to get from more terrorists attacks.

Like the bataclan wasn't enough.
 

Joni

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,508
I don't see how thinking murder over a picture is wrong but that Macron is using a tragedy to dog whistle is somehow victim blaming.
You called the teacher a bigot.

I think at the end of the day you have to stop and wonder if this is worth the hundreds of victims France is going to get from more terrorists attacks.

Like the bataclan wasn't enough.

The solution to terrorism isn't agreeing with the terrorists.
 

Shifty360

Alt-Account
Banned
Sep 3, 2020
818
What's wrong with boycotting products from a country whose government is very well known for hating people like you?

Exactly!

There is a disproportionate amount of poverty, crime and prison incarceration among the Muslim population in France.

There are many examples of them being treated as a second class citizenry.

There is a crisis and it is France and it's treatment of its minorities. No shock that most of the terrorist acts have been domestic, people that have been made to feel ostracised within French society reacting against it. A lot of these people are radicalised in the prisons and come from disadvantaged backgrounds.

This is a systemic issue within France and how it treats its Muslim minority.
 

SecondNature

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,576
People can not agree with the teachings, but they can at least respect them by not throwing insults.

They know that it's in appropriate, but they do it anyway. It's literally an insult which can lead to extrimism acts.


isnt this the same guy?

www.google.ca

Iran's top diplomat says his country executes gay people because of 'moral principles'

Iran, which is among six countries that imposes the death penalty for homosexuality, reportedly publicly hanged a gay man in late January.

giving us a lecture on extremism? U dont need to behead a guy on the street to be an extremist
 

Jibreel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
350
Fuck Macron and fuck France.

Two Muslim women stabbed under Eiffel Tower 'by white women shouting "dirty Arabs"'

This happened after the incident people are mentioning in this thread, but we all know the one white guy is more important than the two muslim women. France is one of the most Islamophobic countries in the world.

"The French are a people that are in crisis all over the world today."

There's been a string of attacks against Muslims in France, this is another such example where siblings were attacked (one of the victims is a school teacher at a government school).
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,466
User banned (3 months): Explicitly and broadly justifying religiously motivated violence
France and Britain are highly responsible for the rise of religious extremism and radical fundamentalism in West Asia and North Africa. Their colonial legacy has left an entire region highly politically unstable and thousands of people radicalized by those circumstances, and that's to say nothing of their present day profiting from the military industrial complex and their participation in America's forever wars. Any violence that results from that can simply be described as the chickens coming home to roost.

As always, fuck France.
 
Dec 31, 2017
7,967
Macron's statements are needlessly generalized, so I get the problem. There's already an huge islamophobiabproblem in France and their leader is clumping in the entire religion in crisis, then you are clumping in the extremists with non extremists, which will only exacerbate the problem. It will lead to nothing constructive wrt the discussions that need to happen in Islam as a whole about integration with "European" society. But if you're qualifying the boycott via justification of that murder, then you're not coming from a place of good faith, and sound pretty extreme yourself (like the minister from Jordan.
The murder is working as intended by the extremist though, continuous rifts are being formed between Muslims and non Muslims because of it. Mission accomplished.
 

Deleted member 910

Oct 25, 2017
16,503

Of course. If the line is "don't draw cartoons to piss off lunatics at your own risk" or "provoke them so that literally every single french citizen becomes a target" I'll pick easily.

I live on the street where the Paris attacks happened. So excuse me to not give a flying fuck about not being able to draw cartoons if that can keep us safer.

I guess it's easy to be all about muh values when you're far from danger.


The solution to terrorism isn't agreeing with the terrorists.

Cool.

And how many innocents are going to die ?

They're brain washed. You're bargain with them, you can't reason with them, this is a lost cause. Stop provoking them and putting everybody's life in jeopardy.
 

Joni

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,508
I guess it's easy to be all about muh values when you're far from danger.
I live in Brussels, I was in the subway the day of the attacks on Brussels.

They're brain washed. You're bargain with them, you can't reason with them, this is a lost cause. Stop provoking them and putting everybody's life in jeopardy.

The attack on the Bataclan was motivated by Western way of life being bad, gays being bad, ... Are you okay with changing that? I mean, we shouldn't provoke them and put lives at jeopardy.
 

Rosenkrantz

Member
Jan 17, 2018
5,472
People are free to boycott whatever they want as long as they're not trying to justify someone getting beheaded or shot because he drew a fucking picture
I mean, I don't think many Muslims are justifying beheading of a teacher by pointing out that a lot of times these caricatures are fueling bigotry and anti-muslim sentiment under the guise of freedom of speech.
 

Kthulhu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,670
User banned (1 month): Suggesting a victim was deliberately "baiting" his killer into murdering him
You called the teacher a bigot.

Do you not know what a dog whistle is?

Like can you really tell me people at an event like this are tolerant people?:

"Draw Muhammad Cartoon Contest"

In February of 2015, it was announced that AFDI would host a "Draw Muhammad Cartoon Contest," in Garland, Texas. This was clearly a move by Geller to incite America's Muslim community, as depicting the Prophet is extremely offensive to many Muslims. The site was chosen because CAIR has organized a "Stand With the Prophet" event at the same location. At Geller's event, a $10,000 prize would be awarded to the best cartoon chosen by judges and it was later announced that a "People's Choice" winner would be awarded a $2,500 prize.

The keynote speaker at the May 3 event was Geller's old friend Geert Wilders. Spencer was also scheduled to speak. On April 8, less than a month before the event, Geller and Spencer revealed the People's Choice contenders on the far-right media outlet Breitbart, encouraging people to vote for their favorite. "And we hope that this event will give others the courage to stand up as well and show the world that they aren't going to submit to intimidation. Otherwise, it is no exaggeration to say that all will be lost," Geller and Spencer wrote.

Not surprisingly, there was a massive security presence at the event in Garland, where anti-Muslim cartoonist Bosch Fawstin won both the judges' and People's Choice awards. The event will not be remembered for the cartoons or the winner, however. Just as the event ended, two men pulled into the parking lot of the convention center where it was taking place and started shooting. "A security guard was shot in the leg before an officer returned fire, remarkably hitting both attackers who died at the scene." The attackers were two U.S. citizens who had a copy of an ISIS flag with them in the car. Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi had driven from Arizona to attack the event and received help from their friend Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem, who provided them with weapons. Kareem is currently serving a 30-year sentence for his role in the attack.

Naturally, Geller exploited the tragedy, appearing on program after program and using that platform to defend her actions under the banner of "free speech." Geller completely ignored the incitement factor of her "contest" in an op-ed she was offered in Time. "And make no mistake: If it weren't for the free-speech conference, these jihadis would have struck somewhere else — a place where there was less security, like the Lindt cafe in Australia or the Hyper Cacher Kosher supermarket in Paris," she wrote. Geller went on to claim, "Allowing this sort of censorship would mean nothing less [than] civilizational suicide."

www.splcenter.org

Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller is the anti-Muslim movement's most visible and flamboyant figurehead.

Same shit different country. Drawings of Muhammad are basically trolling done by islamophobes to bait radicals into attacking them so they can exploit the tragedy to justify bigoted policy.
 

Fatoy

Member
Mar 13, 2019
7,587
I mean, I don't think many Muslims are justifying beheading of a teacher by pointing out that a lot of times these caricatures are fueling bigotry and anti-muslim sentiment under the guise of freedom of speech.
This I agree with. There is a clear point to be made - and one I support - that no belief should be immune to criticism on pain of death. But it's also clear that people are very willing to piggy-back on that just to provoke a particular belief they don't like.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,466
lmao at all the people wringing their hands over calling the teacher a bigot

The fuck was he taking time out of his class to show racist caricatures of the Prophet for if not bigotry?
 

shnurgleton

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,882
Boston
France can be and often is incredibly boneheaded and racist about Islam and other cultures that exist within their borders, but this isn't one of those instances
 

Alavard

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,728
Muslims have also been angered by Macron's comments earlier this month that Islam is "a religion that is in crisis all over the world today"

Honestly, fuck Macron. Insane statements like this only serve to drive further division and create more hatred, and he knows it.
 

Shifty360

Alt-Account
Banned
Sep 3, 2020
818
France can be and often is incredibly boneheaded and racist about Islam and other cultures that exist within their borders, but this isn't one of those instances

And yet it can be seen as another instance in a long line of attacking a minority in its country already treated like shit.

These things don't exist in isolation.
 

Ravensmash

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,797
Do you not know what a dog whistle is?

Like can you really tell me people at an event like this are tolerant people?:



www.splcenter.org

Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller is the anti-Muslim movement's most visible and flamboyant figurehead.

Same shit different country. Drawings of Muhammad are basically trolling done by islamophobes to bait radicals into attacking them so they can exploit the tragedy to justify bigoted policy.

Why are you bringing up a completely different incident from a far-right islamophobe in the USA when by all accounts this was a teacher using it in a lesson about freedom of expression?

He didn't draw them. It doesn't sound like he was trying to bait radicals into attacking him so he could exploit the tragedy of his own murder....
 

Xando

Member
Oct 28, 2017
31,551
Do you not know what a dog whistle is?

Like can you really tell me people at an event like this are tolerant people?:



www.splcenter.org

Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller is the anti-Muslim movement's most visible and flamboyant figurehead.

Same shit different country. Drawings of Muhammad are basically trolling done by islamophobes to bait radicals into attacking them so they can exploit the tragedy to justify bigoted policy.
So you defend yourself not victim blaming by... directly going back to victim blaming?
 
Discussion Guidelines

The Artisan

"Angels are singing in monasteries..."
Moderator
Oct 27, 2017
8,894
Official Staff Communication
Thread reopened, we really got off to a bad start with this one. Please observe these guidelines.

1. Do not blame the French teacher for his own killing. Do not suggest that he deserved to die, that he brought it upon himself, that he knowingly provoked his own murder, or that his murder was justified in any way. This is victim blaming.

2. It is not victim blaming to suggest that the victim may have been a bigot. Showing off illustrations of Muhammad in a country like France can be punching down at a marginalized minority. Merely pointing this out, and trying to discuss this, does not mean that violence was an appropriate response.

3. This is a sensitive thread and posters will have strong opinions. Respect other members and do not engage in personal attacks. Trolling will get you banned. If you believe another member is breaking these guidelines report them and move on.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,484
It seems to me that people think it's all about the cartoons, when it's just one in a whole host of ways that France has been shit to its Muslim citizens. Murder is obviously taking things too far, but it's not like any ill feelings Muslims, especially French ones, have towards the country sprang oit from nowhere or are completely unjustified.

I'm sure this is probably all just a convenient excuse for Erdogan, though. Not that I'd be against boycotts against France, generally.

"Our history is one of a battle against tyranny and fanatacisms. We will continue," Macron tweeted in three languages, French, English and Arabic.

Colonial powers don't get to say this.
 

Shoot

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,487
"These calls distort the positions defended by France in favour of freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, freedom of religion and the refusal of any call to hatred," it read.

"Consequently, the calls for boycott are pointless and must cease immediately, as must all attacks against our country, instrumentalised by a radical minority."
How can Macron defend freedom of religion when it does not even exist in France?

Now he is encouraging other countries to suppress a boycott of French products, suppressing their freedom of speech.

Macron is a blatant Islamophobe, but is too cowardly to own up to it.
 
OP
OP
SilentPanda

SilentPanda

Member
Nov 6, 2017
15,896
Earth
I'm more than fine with calling out Islamophobia when it's due but surely this sort of reaction to a rather unnecessary tragedy is rather odd? Again, if there's anything Islamophobic about Macron's specific comments here please do let me know because it really isn't that apparent to me.

What's behind the Middle East boycott of French products?

Since 1905, France has adopted the laicite or secularism value, which forces the state to remain neutral – that is, to neither support nor stigmatise any religion.

Yet the country's reaction towards Islam on its own turf, spurred in part by its traumatic defeat in Algeria, has led to regulations that have targeted the visibility of Islam. According to the state, French Muslims live in a counter-society.

In 2004, France became the first and only European country to ban the hijab, a veil worn by some Muslim women, in public schools. A few years later, it also passed a law that banned the wearing of the niqab, or face covering.

And while a 1978 law forbids the French state from collecting statistics on race, religion or ethnicity, the rise of Islamophobia in recent years has been documented by human rights and civil society groups such as the Collective against Islamophobia in France, also known as CCIF.

Macron's comments of seeking to reform Islam – a religion that is more than 1,400 years old and is followed by two billion people around the world – is an ambitious and provocative move; several activists have said the government should instead invest more effort in addressing the marginalisation of French Muslims in the banlieues, or surburban ghettos in the country.

Residents of these areas, often with ancestry in Africa and the Middle East, are alienated; they suffer from high levels of unemployment and poor social housing. They are marginalised in every sense of the word – public transport from the banlieues to the centre of Paris, for instance, is severely lacking.

Since 2012, there have been 36 attacks carried out by a fringe minority of Muslims on French soil.

Yet instead of tackling the root causes of this phenomenon – which some, including Macron himself, have argued include social alienation, the state instead has turned its attention to focusing on the entirety of its Muslim citizens, as though they are a monolith, while not directing the same energy towards white supremacists and Nazis in the country.

www.aljazeera.com

What’s behind the Middle East boycott of French products?

Muslim leaders accuse Macron of using divisive rhetoric for political gain and alienating France’s six million Muslims.
 
Jan 31, 2018
1,430
Hmmm...Kind of hypocritical of France to on the one hand, claim freedom of expression allows them to intentionally offend others while at the same time, act entirely outraged at the notion of people exercising their own freedom of expression by boycotting French goods.

It's almost like this whole freedom angle is a sham and it's really just about Islamophobia.
 

Magni

Member
What's behind the Middle East boycott of French products?









www.aljazeera.com

What’s behind the Middle East boycott of French products?

Muslim leaders accuse Macron of using divisive rhetoric for political gain and alienating France’s six million Muslims.

The hijab along with every other religious sign is banned in schools. It's not like the hijab was targeted in particular.

The burka ban was much more targeted, despite attempts to camouflage it as a ban against "face coverings" in general. It was a stupid appeal to the far right, given how few people wear wear a burka or niqab in France in the first place.

France has a ton of work to do on better integrating its Muslim population, but there is definite truth that Islam (and all other religions honestly) could use with some reform. France is definitely not the best to implement said reform though, that needs to come from the Muslim world. It's hard to see how it'll come about though, when you see who's in power in the region.
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,041
People can not agree with the teachings, but they can at least respect them by not throwing insults.

They know that it's in appropriate, but they do it anyway. It's literally an insult which can lead to extrimism acts.

Fuck this way of thinking. Insulting your religion is never an excuse for violence, much less beheading. Just as people should be free to mock Christianity, so too should they be free to mock Islam without fear of violent retaliation.
 

Kinthey

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
23,859
2. It is not victim blaming to suggest that the victim may have been a bigot. Showing off illustrations of Muhammad in a country like France can be punching down at a marginalized minority. Merely pointing this out, and trying to discuss this, does not mean that violence was an appropriate response.
I feel like this mischaracterizes what happened. It wasn't suggested that he might have been a bigot, he was declared as such. It also seems like an inflammatory accusation considering that we know that the teacher was teaching about freedom of expression and was respectful enough to ask any Muslim students to step outside if they don't want to see the images. Unless there are some new details I haven't heard about I find it wrong to smear him as such.
 

Magni

Member
I feel like this mischaracterizes what happened. It wasn't suggested that he might have been a bigot, he was declared as such. It also seems like an inflammatory accusation considering that we know that the teacher was teaching about freedom of expression and was respectful enough to ask any Muslim students to step outside if they don't want to see the images. Unless there are some new details I haven't heard about I find it wrong to smear him as such.

To further your point, the class was about how blasphemy is not a thing in France due to freedom of expression, and he used caricatures of the the three main religions in France, not just Islam but also Christianity and Judaism.

It's not like he was just randomly punching down on Islam for the hell of it.
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,041
Fuck Macron and fuck France.

Two Muslim women stabbed under Eiffel Tower 'by white women shouting "dirty Arabs"'

This happened after the incident people are mentioning in this thread, but we all know the one white guy is more important than the two muslim women. France is one of the most Islamophobic countries in the world.

"The French are a people that are in crisis all over the world today."
It's almost like all three people are victims. A man was fucking beheaded over NOTHING. Why diminish his death this way?
 

ZiZ

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,716
ResetEra: How dare muslims try to boycott France, a country that is openly against Islam.

Also ResetEra in almost every thread that mentions any Arab country with oil: We should stop buying oil from the Middle East.

It's almost like all three people are victims. A man was fucking beheaded over NOTHING. Why diminish his death this way?

His death isn't being deminished this whole thread became about him when it was originally about the boycott, the 2 women who are never mentioned are the ones being deminished.
 

BlueStarEXSF

Member
Dec 3, 2018
5,111
I wasn't planning on writing anything about this. Heck, I didn't think I would care this much but some of the takes in this thread rubbed me the wrong way due to the ignorance with regard to Islam. I want to start by saying that I am an Canadian Algerian and that I used to be muslim. I also want to add that I do not condone the killing of anyone and fuck the killers.

Now, some of you don't understand the significance of drawing Mohammed like this. A lot of you are saying that it's a matter of freedom of expression, while freedom of expression is good, the way you express yourself matters. Providing concrete criticism is something I absolutely support and I criticism Islam myself. However, this drawing of the prophet is not criticism, it's a direct insult to all Muslims. Islam is such a profound part of the culture of those that practice is that this depiction of the prophet is essentially a grave insult/slur. I'm not sure this is the correct term but I'd go as far as to say that it's racist and, at minimum, Islamophobic. With that said, I abhor the atrocities people made as revenge for this insult. I got in a heated argument with my mother over this because you'd think she almost supports it damn it.

The french government's display of those caricatures in the name of support of this murdered man is essentially them insulting the entirety of their muslim population. This is rich coming from France considering their colonial past and how they still take advantage of North Africa. The muslim population of France mainly comes from past colonies such as Algeria which means that, ironically, this is a problem of France's own making and the only thing they are doing is putting oil on fire. Macron's response really rubs me the wrong way. Yes, condone the killings, trash terrorists and work towards respect and integration. No, don't display slurs to your muslim population and don't you dare say: "Islam is in crisis around the world". That's none of your business.

Again, I didn't think this topic would bother me enough to post but here I am.
 

TouchOfGray

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
801
Official Staff Communication
Thread reopened, we really got off to a bad start with this one. Please observe these guidelines.

2. It is not victim blaming to suggest that the victim may have been a bigot. Showing off illustrations of Muhammad in a country like France can be punching down at a marginalized minority. Merely pointing this out, and trying to discuss this, does not mean that violence was an appropriate response.

I guess you could say he was no angel.
 

TheAndyMan

Banned
Feb 11, 2019
1,082
Utah
Lots of complex issues here.
However, it does feel like the people who shout "free speech" , and using it to specifically make racist, and anti-islam remarks have an agenda.

They want a polarized society, "Islam vs the West", and invoking free speech here reminds me of say, Milo going to Berkeley.
What he wanted was a culture war.

People who say "fuck religion" in this thread are missing nuance. Plenty of Muslims are protesting against this(free speech) because they're offended by this.

And how can you deny the teacher wasn't try to provoke controversy by showing Charlie Hebdo cartoons to Muslims? Completely unprofessional and inconsiderate.

And people who miss nuance are saying this is "victim blaming". Wrong.There were angry reactions from teachers and students, but nothing like what the murderer did.

Edit: "Free speech" here is being used how the Alt-right does, to antagonize and anger(troll). Just because you can say it(legally), doesn't mean you should.

And I say this as an atheist.
 

Heroicpiglet

Avenger
Dec 22, 2017
2,101
This is from the perspective of someone that is not from the western world and religious background:

I'm aware that the drawing is a great insult to Muslim but for you do not behead people when someone insult you. In my case I will ignore them or fight back with words or physical in the most extreme situation. But we gotta have priority here, beheading people and taking picture are not acceptable for any insults being threw at you. That action is so barbaric and twist I can not even begin to think about, let alone doing it.
 

BlueStarEXSF

Member
Dec 3, 2018
5,111
Lots of complex issues here.
However, it does feel like the people who shout "free speech" , and using it to specifically make racist, and anti-islam remarks have an agenda.

They want a polarized society, "Islam vs the West", and invoking free speech here reminds me of say, Milo going to Berkeley.
What he wanted was a culture war.

People who say "fuck religion" in this thread are missing nuance. Plenty of Muslims are protesting against this(free speech) because they're offended by this.

And how can you deny the teacher wasn't try to provoke controversy by showing Charlie Hebdo cartoons to Muslims? Completely unprofessional and inconsiderate.

And people who miss nuance are saying this is "victim blaming". Wrong.There were angry reactions from teachers and students, but nothing like what the murderer did.

Edit: "Free speech" here is being used how the Alt-right does, to antagonize and anger(troll). Just because you can say it(legally), doesn't mean you should.

And I say this as an atheist.
Absolutely this. Thank you ! You put it in words better than I could.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.