That is some Mafia shit "be a real shame if the audio mix is off in the theater"is it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
Okay then it's not just me.That is some Mafia shit "be a real shame if the audio mix is off in the theater"
is it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
You all like my posts now but if you pay me money I will release the director cuts to my posts which are even better. Venmo or PayPal?
You have to post the message on some obscure Social media platformYou all like my posts now but if you pay me money I will release the director cuts to my posts which are even better. Venmo or PayPal?
You have to post the message on some obscure Social media platform
is it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
Someone should give Nolan some extra moneyThat is some Mafia shit "be a real shame if the audio mix is off in the theater"
So not about artistic intention, or anything meaningful just...."I can help you sell the same movie twice for a bit more money". I see why he still gets work. He speaks their language without pretension.
To be fair the cartoon was made and released at the same time as the movie. The Ultimate Cut only cut them in where they appeared in the comic, but it did already exist.I didn't take that away at all. He referred to the extended ones as the "weirdo" but he does need money for the people that do the effects, sound, etc. The extended version of Watchmen is a perfect example - it's longer, with cartoon interludes. It's not the way most people would want to watch it, but it is "more".
- not a Snyder fan in the modern sense.
That is some Mafia shit "be a real shame if the audio mix is off in the theater"
Not to mention - minus 1 or 2 - all of his films have generated a profit.It's one of the reasons, he also stays on budget, delivers films timely, and has an excellent rapport with his actors. People genuinely like to work with him.
I LITERALLY said this in one of the Rebel Moon threads and people doubted me! I sounds like he realizes he can push for a toned down version and a DC, and get slightly more money, than if he tried pushing for his original vision from the startis it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
Not what he's saying at all. Lol. He clearly says that he does what the studio mandates for release and then wants to be able to release and sell a version that has all the extras. Not really that dissimilar to a game releasing and then 6-12 months later releasing a GOTY, Definitive Edition, ect with all the extras and DLC. Would either of you say that a game was made into a "bad version" at release in order to make a "definitive" edition later?I LITERALLY said this in one of the Rebel Moon threads and people doubted me! I sounds like he realizes he can push for a toned down version and a DC, and get slightly more money, than if he tried pushing for his original vision from the start
I got into an argument in the rogue squadron thread last weekend about why he keeps getting green lit. This is literally why. Dude makes movies, some good some bad, that consistently make money. If he didn't he would quit getting budget.Not to mention - minus 1 or 2 - all of his films have generated a profit.
is it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
Is the directors cut of watchmen actually better than the theatrical?
To be fair the cartoon was made and released at the same time as the movie. The Ultimate Cut only cut them in where they appeared in the comic, but it did already exist.
Oh so THATS what Christopher Nolan is tryna doThat is some Mafia shit "be a real shame if the audio mix is off in the theater"
And James Cameron only does HFR in theater to sell a more consistent frame rate version later.
Momoa most likely saw the assembly or rough cut, not the four hour DC, which materialized later after WB/HBO initiated talks.Here's my thing though, how the fuck did the "the SnyderCut is already finished, WB just has a locked in vault" narrative take shape?
I vividly remember even Jason Mamoa egging people on with that story.
Snyder finished the DC of JL without getting paid. The VFX artists and various staff members did get paid though.I'm almost jealous, I need to figure out a way to scam people into giving me money twice for the garbage I put out.
After (sorta) watching Rogue Moon I can only envision that his Director's Cut of it would entail adding slo-mo to every scene that doesn't already have it.
He got paid in exposure, which everyone knows is the most valuable currency of all :)Momoa most likely saw the assembly or rough cut, not the four hour DC, which materialized later after WB initiated talks.
Snyder finished the DC of JL without getting paid. The VFX artists and various staff members did get paid though.
It's the only one of his I think is actually better instead of just longer.Is the directors cut of watchmen actually better than the theatrical?
is it just me or is he admitting to making bad versions of his movies in the editing room in hopes that he'll get paid to make the "real version"
All I hear is that he was going out of his way to make an additional profit for the studio.
The hate you all have in your hearts for this man is just staggering.
Yup, only movie he's been involved with that had a loss was WW84, Sucker Punch was his worst and that broke even more or less.I got into an argument in the rogue squadron thread last weekend about why he keeps getting green lit. This is literally why. Dude makes movies, some good some bad, that consistently make money. If he didn't he would quit getting budget.
That was hilarious
I feel like I've been in a dream where I was really invested in the Zack Snyder Cut of Justice League
My understanding is his team was only involved with the first Wonder Woman, and Jenkins went without his team for 84. Hence the steep decline in quality of the actions scenes.Yup, only movie he's been involved with that had a loss was WW84, Sucker Punch was his worst and that broke even more or less.