How noticeable do the burn in issues tend to be? Haven't seen it in person so intrigued.
It's been discussed quite much in detail on AVS. The users that have a deeper understanding how TVs work are stating that Image Retention does not necessarily lead to Burn In. See here: http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-ol...nt-future-oled-tv-owners-10.html#post54949910
You'll see that actually there are two separate conditions. Here's one example from a user who has over 10,000 posts on AVS, and has been a member there for 15 years:
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-ol...ent-future-oled-tv-owners-9.html#post54947622
" ... Temporary image-retention is caused by transistor threshold shift that can be sensed and compensated for internally, while permanent burn-in is caused by differential aging, which cannot be sensed internally.
While the impact of both of these mechanisms on image quality can 'appear' identical, they have nothing to do with each other..."
Other users, like this one, agree with the above sentiment: http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-ol...-burn-test-includes-oleds-3.html#post54806272
Lastly, I need to amend my statement a bit. It seems that none of the brands cover burn-in (LG, Sony, or Panasonic). Samsung has already begun using the BI issue as a marketing tactic against OLED, and stated at IFA that BI is one of the principal reasons why they have not opted to use the technology in their TVs.
Perhaps the most telling of all: The warranty is only for one year to begin with. I could understand if the brands chose not to cover BI if the warranty was for 3+ years. Getting BI in less than a year is an obvious defect and should be covered.
Some of the experts on AVS forums are now concerned that the premature aging of pixels (BI) is cumulative; which means that in certain cases, it's not a matter of 'if', but 'when'.
Note that this test only tests the short term image retention and not the permanent burn-in that may occur with a longer exposition to static images. We are currently running a burn-in test that should give us clue on how each type of TVs respond to a longer exposure to static image and you can read more on this test here.
I'm curious if the OLED Light setting for the B6 has any impact on image retention/burn in. In other words, if the OLED Light is at maximum brightness, does this have any impact on image retention?
OLED light makes a massive difference to burn-in; when the OLEDs are brighter they burn in faster. To account for this we set all three TVs to the same brightness of 175 cd/m² on white, to simulate typical living room viewing.
Did you remember to turn off the energy saver mode on your tv? It's so damn stupid it's enables by default but that is what destroys the hdr image.I currently have a Samsung KS7000 (UK) and after following Digital Foundry's guide to configuring the television for HDR and games, I must say I wasn't all too impressed with the HDR implementation in Assassins Creed: Origins. I wasn't able to compare with the HDR disabled, but I wasn't noticing the deep and vibrant colours others has described. In fact, it looked quite bland and lifeless.
During the Black Friday manic weekend, I picked up a Dell UltraSharp U2718Q 27" monitor, and although it's "Dell HDR" and peaks at 350nits, the picture was significantly different from the KS7000 in the best way possible. I could actually see what people had been describing HDR as in recent threads. I found the image to somewhat clearer as well, and the input lag was better for it being a monitor rather than a television display, even with game mode enabled.
Dolby Vision is another form of HDR. There are two out now: HDR10 and Dolby Vision. HDR10 is free and thus you'll find it everywhere, DV requires paying licensing to Dolby iirc, but it is superior to HDR10 in every way. More and more content is becoming DV enabled. If you're buying a TV at this stage, it wouldn't make sense to not get a set with both.
The 930e is a great TV, congrats.
And yet...
It doesn't matter what the mechanical differences between image retention and burn-in are, when the way you end up with both, are from the same habits.
Also very worth noting, and something I had already assumed was the case for a long time (pre OLEDs too):
This might explain why some who are gaming with their OLED at lower levels have been reporting less (or no) issues overall compared to those that have it up higher to compensate for brighter lit rooms. This also might make HDR gaming even more dubious though.
Did you remember to turn off the energy saver mode on your tv? It's so damn stupid it's enables by default but that is what destroys the hdr image.
I got the B7 on Saturday and have been loving it, but I'd be lying if I said this thread didn't make me a bit nervous. I'd say my ratio of gaming to tv/movie time is likely 75%/25% so I'm questioning whether I should have gone with the X900E instead. Those inky inky blacks are so delicious though. I had never previously spent more than £450 on a TV so this represents a massive step-up on every level. I'm still taken aback when the screen goes completely black, like on a loading screen, and it is actually pitch black, not a kind of dark grey with splodges of backlight everywhere.
I own a One X but I've been sensible and have been finishing off SOMA on PS4 before indulging in some 4K/HDR content, since if I drop the game I'll end up not finishing it. Even though it takes no advantage of 4K or HDR, there is still a very clear step-up from playing it on my LCD. The aforematched blacks create so much contrast, torch use now feels essential compared to before since dark corners are actually dark, and the very numerous flourescent lights in the game positively glow against the dark backdrops. It looks fantastic and is only a mid-budget indie game. I can't wait to see what proper high budget 4K HDR content offers. I don't recall seeing any IR at all so far.
I really love the remote/interface too. WebOS is snappy, clear and intuitive, and the magic remote feels like a game changer (don't know if other brands have similar remotes but I've never used one before). Navigating TV menus and apps has always been a tedious chore for me - the addition of the pointer suddenly makes navigating them a breeze. I now doubt whether I will ever use the video apps on my PS4 or XBox again when they're limited by clunky controller input. Even my Chromecast suddenly feels redundant when everything is so easy straight from the TV.
To put my mind at ease regarding IR/BI, I might just adjust my habits a bit so more TV content gets shown in between gaming sessions. Normally I wouldn't put the TV straight on when I get home from work and am cooking dinner but I might stick the TV on when I get home in the background so that I'm not constantly just coming home and going straight to gaming. I have also developed the bad habit of leaving games paused on the screen while I go make dinner/go to the toilet/pop to the shops. Seems like another good opportunity to stick some video content on in between sessions.
I'm very happy so far and can't wait to give it a proper workout once SOMA is finished.
I did the same thing, impulse buy.Bought a new 65 inch B7 this week...I was having a bit of buyers remorse upgrading from a KS8000 until I watched a movie in the dark. Was pretty much sold after that..
I did the same thing, impulse buy.
Potential buyer's remorse here too (it hasn't arrived yet, and I think I can send it back).
You had buyer remore after or before testing the B7?
My fears are:
- not bright enough. I've read horror stories about HDR game mode in particular. I don't like dark tone mapping (had to deal with it with my Epson projector, I fixed it after a lot of tweaking). I prefer a compromise, not a total dim (which I hate) or a total clipped solution. Is it true the image is too dim in hdr game mode? What about hdr movie mode? What's the opinion a ks8000 user?
- image retention. I use games and pc (even for work) a lot more than I watch regular programs. Will this damage the panel?
I bought the tv for it's amazing viewing angles (really terrible on the KS. That's really important to me), and and DV support (a nice addition), but I'm starting to feel it wasn't the right decision for my using habits.
Don't really care about sdr at this point (which I know oled does best).
In the end, what do you think of the B7 compared to the KS8000?
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
I got the B7 on Saturday and have been loving it, but I'd be lying if I said this thread didn't make me a bit nervous.
yeah. Which can happen out of the box, or maybe it shows up after three years of ownership.
I feel the same way man. I want the brightest LCD for both video games and sports, and so that I don't have to give it extra special attention while still worrying about IR.Yeah i think Ive decided on the X930E. I just don't want worry about IB and i def don't want to baby the thing.
yeah, the same way it's possible to enjoy an Xbox as an all-in-one gaming machine.
Enjoying a nice game on my OLED with a static ticker. It IS possible to enjoy a OLED for what it is, a TV :p
lol what! Exactly. I'm all for being solutions-oriented, but I don't want to have to babysit my television under any circumstances. Run alternate content for "a couple of hours afterward" is a complete joke for anyone that has anything resembling a normal lifestyle.If you play the same game with the same HUD for multiple hours every day, make sure you run an alternate form of content (like a DVD or cable broadcast) for a couple hours afterward before shutting the TV off.
Basically, if you're using a TV as a TV and not strictly a "gaming monitor", your chances of getting actual permanent burn-in are almost negligible. This is how I've been treating mine, and so far zero problems, but I always make it a point to watch some kind of full screen video content after more than three hours of gaming with HUDs on screen.
Exactly this too! You can immediately dismiss the opinions of anyone that pretends to understand the long-term effects of burn-in potential. We simply don't know yet. All we know for certain is there is a much higher rate of problems relative to LED LCDs.Some of the experts on AVS forums are now concerned that the premature aging of pixels (BI) is cumulative; which means that in certain cases, it's not a matter of 'if', but 'when'.
I also came from a KS8000 to a B7I did the same thing, impulse buy.
Potential buyer's remorse here too (it hasn't arrived yet, and I think I can send it back).
You had buyer remore after or before testing the B7?
My fears are:
- not bright enough. I've read horror stories about HDR game mode in particular. I don't like dark tone mapping (had to deal with it with my Epson projector, I fixed it after a lot of tweaking). I prefer a compromise, not a total dim (which I hate) or a total clipped solution. Is it true the image is too dim in hdr game mode? What about hdr movie mode? What's the opinion a ks8000 user?
- image retention. I use games and pc (even for work) a lot more than I watch regular programs. Will this damage the panel?
I bought the tv for it's amazing viewing angles (really terrible on the KS. That's really important to me), and and DV support (a nice addition), but I'm starting to feel it wasn't the right decision for my using habits.
Don't really care about sdr at this point (which I know oled does best).
In the end, what do you think of the B7 compared to the KS8000?
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
yeah, the same way it's possible to enjoy an Xbox as an all-in-one gaming machine.
well yeah, you bought a low-end TV dude. I'm not sure what you were expecting. In that price range a TCL-P607 would probably perform better, initially. You might want to check this oneout.Long story short, I ended up with a cheap 55" Samsung. It's an MU6103.
My existing TV is a beautiful Panasonic plasma P42U30. I bought it in 2012 so I was certain LCD technology has surpassed plasma in every way by now.
It seems that isn't the case, at least with my new Samsung. Super Mario Odyssey has a noticeable blur when I spin the camera around. Colour banding also appears when the sky is dark.
I'm having bad luck with the new stuff as well. Forza 7's dynamic optimisation refuses to hit 60FPS in 4K. The only thing I opt in for is 60FPS VSync. If I force everything to very low is nails 60 no issue. This means the game is too stubborn to maintain performance.
I tried enabling HDR in Windows but the screen just went very dark and that was that.
I wasn't actually prepared to buy a 4K TV any time soon, so my PC isn't good to go either. Still, I should be able to squeeze out a fake 4K with a 970. I looked up a method I remembered from Digital Foundry's "4K On A Budget" series to set the resolution to 1800p, which somewhat approximates optimisation methods on consoles. It's "As simple as that" according to the videos, but the TV doesn't like 1800p and refuses to display until I remote into my PC and restore the resolution. I did get 3200x1800 to show up in a game once, but it worked for Cuphead and not with Forza 7. The option appears in the Hitman boot window, but the display drops as soon as I kick off a benchmark.
This 55" TV sure is much bigger than my 42" plasma, but in certain aspects my plasma from five years ago still has it beat.
don't listen to him. He's one of the several LG B7 bigoted owners on here; just look at his post history. The 930E is nice but there is a big difference between $1000 and $1500. What you would be getting amounts to: a future Dolby Vision firmware update, slightly better local dimming, a brighter screen, and the better X1 Extreme processor. Going above a 900E is where we reach a level of considerable diminishing returns on what you get for your money. That's why it was the most popular TV this year.Thanks for the explanation. I'm really glad I didn't get the 900e now.
A "normal lifestyle" would very likely have alternate content by itself, so no need to go out of your way. Playing the same content non stop without alternating would seem to be an extreme case to me. I have a wife and two kids using the B7 regularly and I've had not issues, including many long sports and gaming sessions.lol what! Exactly. I'm all for being solutions-oriented, but I don't want to have to babysit my television under any circumstances. Run alternate content for "a couple of hours afterward" is a complete joke for anyone that has anything resembling a normal lifestyle.
Great. The LG B7 is an excellent TV for the money, and for people that want to go that route. :)A "normal lifestyle" would very likely have alternate content by itself, so no need to go out of your way. Playing the same content non stop without alternating would seem to be an extreme case to me. I have a wife and two kids using the B7 regularly and I've had not issues, including many long sports and gaming sessions.
I've owned several Plasma sets before the B7, and I've not had any problems dealing with IR given the image quality benefits that these sets have provided for me. I'm happy for others if they want an "idiot proof" set, but even my wife will now notice how poor some of our family/friends TVs look compared to ours. I could probably fix some of it with a decent calibration, but I've given up trying to help others with their TVs when they don't even understand what was wrong to begin with.
yeah, the same way it's possible to enjoy an Xbox as an all-in-one gaming machine.
yeah, the same way it's possible to enjoy an Xbox as an all-in-one gaming machine.
I now have a 55" C7 and a 65" 900E in my house. I'm trying to decide which one to keep, and it's tough. I haven't had much time to play with the 900E yet, but there are differences:
- Build quality is fine on the 900E, but the C7 panel looks amazing, the "picture on glass" look
- HDR brightness is really noticeable on the 900E. Games especially - I was used to the HDR gaming mode on the C7, it almost feels much better on the 900E, even if it may not be technically as accurate.
- Glare seems worse on the 900E so far, but that could be the bigger panel affecting things.
- I had never used android os for tvs before, but I already hate it. The WebOS on the C7 is way better.
- The magic remote for the C7 is way better, the 900E remote is okay, but nothing special. The C7 remote is usable and well designed.
- Input lag seems fine on both of these, even though the C7 is faster. I can't really tell the difference between 21 and 31 ms that easily.
- I don't really notice the narrow viewing angles on the 900E. Even just walking back and forth in front of the TV, it's noticeable but doesn't seem as bad as all the reviews say it is.
- I have not seen any burn in or image retention on the C7 as of yet, after a few weeks. (I'm worried about this, probably the biggest reason for me to get rid of the C7)
- The C7 definitely has the better picture, but the 900E is still very solid. Maybe not inky blacks, but it still does a great job.
I need to get some better settings entered into the 900E, will reevaluate the picture again.
don't listen to him. He's one of the several LG B7 bigoted owners on here; just look at his post history. The 930E is nice but there is a big difference between $1000 and $1500. What you would be getting amounts to: a future Dolby Vision firmware update, slightly better local dimming, a brighter screen, and the better X1 Extreme processor. Going above a 900E is where we reach a level of considerable diminishing returns on what you get for your money. That's why it was the most popular TV this year.
I got the B7 on Saturday and have been loving it, but I'd be lying if I said this thread didn't make me a bit nervous. I'd say my ratio of gaming to tv/movie time is likely 75%/25% so I'm questioning whether I should have gone with the X900E instead. Those inky inky blacks are so delicious though. I had never previously spent more than £450 on a TV so this represents a massive step-up on every level. I'm still taken aback when the screen goes completely black, like on a loading screen, and it is actually pitch black, not a kind of dark grey with splodges of backlight everywhere.
i was set to buy the lg b7 but this thread stopped me from doing it. i cant deal with IR o BI because it will be a gaming tv for the most part. im considering now the sony e905x but i dont know if thats what the x900e is called in my country or not.
well yeah, you bought a low-end TV dude. I'm not sure what you were expecting. In that price range a TCL-P607 would probably perform better, initially. You might want to check this oneout.
that's a low mid-range set as well. You get what you pay for when it comes to televisions. Until you get into the high tier of performance of course. ;)
don't listen to him. He's one of the several LG B7 bigoted owners on here; just look at his post history. The 930E is nice but there is a big difference between $1000 and $1500. What you would be getting amounts to: a future Dolby Vision firmware update, slightly better local dimming, a brighter screen, and the better X1 Extreme processor. Going above a 900E is where we reach a level of considerable diminishing returns on what you get for your money. That's why it was the most popular TV this year.
I want the 930E as well. I'm still trying to decide if it's worth it. But I'm having trouble justifying paying the extra +50% towards it when DV isn't really a thing yet except for a few Netflix programs. That money might be better spent on your next TV set. Most people I have talked to can't justify the 930E right now either.
What?
Anyway, everyone who's freaking out over image retention and burn-in should read this: http://televisions.reviewed.com/fea...creen-burn-in-problems-causes-image-retention
Almost two years old now, but still relevant.
Also, this is probably the most important takeaway from the entire article:
If you still have the KS8000 , just use that for gaming. Oleds are great for movies, decent for broadcast tv, and sub par for hdr gaming.I did the same thing, impulse buy.
Potential buyer's remorse here too (it hasn't arrived yet, and I think I can send it back).
You had buyer remore after or before testing the B7?
My fears are:
- not bright enough. I've read horror stories about HDR game mode in particular. I don't like dark tone mapping (had to deal with it with my Epson projector, I fixed it after a lot of tweaking). I prefer a compromise, not a total dim (which I hate) or a total clipped solution. Is it true the image is too dim in hdr game mode? What about hdr movie mode? What's the opinion a ks8000 user?
- image retention. I use games and pc (even for work) a lot more than I watch regular programs. Will this damage the panel?
I bought the tv for it's amazing viewing angles (really terrible on the KS. That's really important to me), and and DV support (a nice addition), but I'm starting to feel it wasn't the right decision for my using habits.
Don't really care about sdr at this point (which I know oled does best).
In the end, what do you think of the B7 compared to the KS8000?
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
and you are a B7 bigot, so who cares. LOL. All you do is defend the B7 because you purchased one.You good bro? I don't even have a Xbox, fam.
You're doing a lot of fear mongering in this thread about OLEDs. You went with a x930e. Congrats. Stop trying to devalue or spook others from enjoying their OLED or future OLED purchases.
I know right! It sure does, doesn't it!It was? Do you have a source for that? Seems like there are a lot more OLED buyers here, particularly of the 2017 LG OLEDs.
okay, enlighten me. Sell me on Dolby Vision content then. I am sincerely interested in hearing about this. I am currently in this dilemma, myself. The Sony sets don't even do it yet. To the vast majority of consumers DV has no bearing on any current viewing habits.The 930E is worth the price difference over the 900E if you can afford it.
Also if you own an Apple TV 4K or a UHD Blu Ray player, DV should matter to you if you want the best HDR viewing experience right now. It's not just on some Netflix shows as Nothing suggests.
I had totally tried to do that before, but didn't realize you could edit the specific resolutions that were listed in the extension block. I found the 4096 resolutions, removed them with CRU, restarted my PC, and I'm all good now. Thanks for leading me to give it another try !Hmm fairpoint. Maybe try an EDID editor or something to remive the 4096x option?
and you are a B7 bigot, so who cares. LOL. All you do is defend the B7 because you purchased one.
Unlike you, I understand the benefits of the competition (OLEDs, in my case)