there is a difference between having legitimate criticism of the movie and what Seeya is doing. all throughout this thread and others, they have been trying to twist every single aspect of Star Wars to fit some strange version that seemingly only they perceive.
Oh geez dude, way to ignore everything that he's said.
Seeya is bringing up examples from the movies and his own experience with swords to prove his point. He even keeps things in context.
Whereas someone like Crossing Eden takes dialaogue from a scene where Yoda's telling Luke that he should do and not just try, ignoring the fact that Luke just spent months doing intense training with Yoda by that point, and then applying only the dialogue to everything about the Force, as if there weren't 6 movies that established that even Jesus Christ himself of the Star Wars universe had to train for long periods of time to attain their level of Force abilities and combat.
All in the defense of a poorly written character who gains abilities in only 30 seconds of trying really really hard. And it's not just with only Force abilities, but technical skills like piloting and physical combat skills. This is legitimate bad writing, because it comes straight out of her ass when the plot demands it. There is no other reason given except "because."
Which brings up...
You're genuinely writing fanfiction
You have no shame dude. you've lied, ignored point blank evidence, and then you have the nerve to say this when you created terms like "force synchronization" to try to explain why she "earns" abilities in seconds when the plot demands it?
What's wrong with you?
Seriously, this is all you do. To try and be right, you ignore so much shit.
You call Luke weak, despite the fact that he's a "farmer" which is absolutely hard work. Very ignorant shit to say.
You say he's bad at combat, using an example of a sand person doing a surprise attack on him? LOL. It's like saying the US had a weak navy because Japan steamrolled over them at Pearl Harbor.
Using the example him at the Catina trying to avoid getting into a fight when they're trying to keep their heads down just just shows how willfully ignorant you are to try and be right.
Going further back, it seems like it was BetterOffEd who brought these examples up, but it's no excuse to ignore the context of the scenes to try and make your own case.
You've done nothing but ignore the context in many scenes, trying to claim that pointing out the term for poorly written characters is sexist (if you want to use a Politically Correct term for this cliche named after the Originator, let us know an accepted one) to dismis legitimate criticism, and then trying to use your own headcannon as some objective fact, like that would explain anything in two movies that made no effort to explain these non-sequiturs.
The fact that you continue going back to these proven to be false claims shows that you're blatantly lying every single time.