It's two words, what kind of writer are you
Sure. "Competent" Michael. Overloaded with admirable traits and qualities, the only well rounded individual on the show, while every other character exists solely to reflect on her to make her look good.
Vulcan logic, Vulcan combat training, smarter than the local engineer genius, convenient action hero that single handedly saves an away team like Ellen Ripley, the most empathetic toward the same space monster because she's the only person around doing what all of Starfleet has been doing in all other series, Spock's sister, Georgiou's adopted daughter figure because she's just *that* excellent at being a first officer, the best of both worlds all around... at least until she irrationally gets emotional at the most inconvenient time, and opts to mutiny and trigger drama rather than explain herself.
This is like watching one long, poorly written Wesley Crusher episode; one where all the adults are assholes and don't listen to him, and his only friend is first-season dumbass Commander Data.
She's a rubber mask and a few over-the-top antagonists away from being a part of the Arrowverse canon.
I'm pretty sure they're trolling
I ask myself this question every time I turn on the TV and expect to see "Star Trek."
There was a backlash to them even casting a woman as the lead before anything else was even put on paper, so the "mary sue" bullshit is no surprise. Whatever half-baked thing they can throw out there that they overheard some douchebag (Hi Max Landis) say one time about another female-lead.
I really enjoyed the episode. The party was a bit weird but honestly the "casual life" has never come across well in Star Trek. Not TOS up to the Kelvin stuff. That's the cost of world building but trying not to be too "weird" and stay grounded, I guess. The time-loop stuff was fun and I'm really enjoying how the focus and POV of characters can shift while keeping Michael pretty prominent.
Everybody offended by the gender implications of the term Mary Sue are dismissing the main point, as if being female has anything to do with the criticisms. Should we use Gary Stu instead? Really, who gives a shit if it's a man or woman? I know I don't, but I do know that since she's a woman, and since watching this garbage unfold is like reading some poorly-written YA power fantasy, Mary Sue seems to fit. Boo fucking hoo if that makes you go to red alert and raise your shields.
This show legit gets dumber than a bag of hammers far too often. We're 7 hours into it and less than a handful of characters even matter. The protagonist could be a transgendered alien sock puppet, and it wouldn't matter. She's the main one rolling out the sudden epiphanies and solutions to overcome all the manufactured drama that happens here.
If I was really trolling I'd be rolling out this kind of nonsense: "Here Mike, hold my beer, I need to go total Leeroy Jenkins on the invulnerable space monster that shredded a platoon of Klingons in front of us last week. REEEE!" - *DING!* Attention: The senior staff position of Chief of Security is now available. Suicidal Cylons need not apply. Klingon spies preferred.
But, I'm not trolling. I'm a fan of the franchise and watching this train wreck is fucking painful.
This is Star Trash. Nemesis tier Action-Trek, shoehorned into a long TV series, sprinkled with nostalgic cues and throwbacks to the better shows.
Disco sucks, and CBS would have been better off throwing bags of money at the Axanar team.
Oh god, how did "Mary Sue" end up in here?
Oh yeah, it's because there are women in the show.
Well you do need a woman to make such a claim.
Not agreeing she a Mary Sue btw. She's no Rey.
If Seven of Nine, the super genius Borg orphan turned real human bean went around saving the day every week, while the rest of the crew did nothing but remain superficial background noise after 7 episodes, I'd be complaining about Voyager too.
If Seven of Nine, the super genius Borg orphan turned real human bean went around saving the day every week, while the rest of the crew did nothing but remain superficial background noise after 7 episodes, I'd be complaining about Voyager too.
This has to be a troll job...right? If not...
That last episode was the best episode yet and exactly what I would prefer the series to be.
- Good character development and exploring Michael's humanity and struggle to understand her human emotions now that she has embraced them.
- Rainn Wilson is fantastic. Probably the closest thing to Q we will get in this show.
- I still can't say I'm a fan of Anthony Rapp's character. The fact that he is so flub with a Captain that is more insane than Janeway doesn't really play with me. At least now his character has something that would warrant such cockiness.
First episode of the show that had me wanting more at the end and I didn't think this Star Trek in a Game of Throne's era storytelling would do that for me.
I'm a fan of the franchise and watching this train wreck is fucking painful.
She didn't Stamets got better and convincing her quicker as once she'd gotten some info from Ash or whatever, he didn't need to get her to do it again. By the end Stamets knows enough about everyone to convince them that this is really happening in the time available and get out of it.Only part of the episode I was confused about was how Michael stated to remember the loops.
Also: Did Starfleet command ever get back to them about rescuing the Admiral?
I have to wonder, how many times did they loop? 100? 1000?
Is it a Groundhog Day situation where they were stuck looping for, like, a decade?
Mudd said he killed Lorca 53ish times right? which would be around 26 hours, so it depends on how many loops they did after that. Probably no more than an extra day.
I think you're right, though I don't know if it was clear if that was the number of times Mudd personally killed Lorca or if he included the number of times he blew up the ship and killed him.
I figured you'd probably like it although I think from the previews it seems to go back to the war stuff next week, so this might be it for you until after the break. lol
You have to keep in mind that Mudd probably wasn't able to make it to Lorca in many of the earlier loops. It doesn't feel like he would count the ones where Lorca dies by ship explosion.Mudd said he killed Lorca 53ish times right? which would be around 26 hours, so it depends on how many loops they did after that. Probably no more than an extra day.
You have to keep in mind that Mudd probably wasn't able to make it to Lorca in many of the earlier loops. It doesn't feel like he would count the ones where Lorca dies by ship explosion.
For example, the second loop that we see, Mudd was already 'at home' in Engineering. Stamets says he's tried many times but he hasn't gotten a win for the home team yet.
The original meaning of the term still has some relevance, particularly when you think of vanity projects where it's clear that the author is writing themselves into a story to feel good about themselves. I mean, the term is literally born out of Star Trek fandom and is used to make fun of fanfic writers who write a sexy female character who gets to bang Kirk/Spock/both at the same time. It's just that the Internet has broadened the term out to the point where it's meaningless.The term Mary/Gary Sue needs to go away. I think the criticism can be valid d but the gendered term just evokes anger instead of discussion.
I personally really disliked the party scene, just felt so incredibly unimaginative. When I tune in for Star Trek I look forward to seeing some kind of (more or less) carefully crafted idea what a future for humanity exploring space could look like. I mean the budget for this is $8M per episode? Sounds like A LOT to me honestly and makes me wonder how exactly the came to the conclusion to show the party scene (which felt like 10%-15% of the episode) in this specific style. When I try to think about what a party on a star-ship 200 years into the future could look like I don't really see any way (and reason) I would end up with the standard "2010 US human frat-style" party that is omnipresent in today's media.Hi!
This was probably one of the more grating parts of the episode to me. It hasn't been given enough time to feel earned, though it could be fast-tracked to serve future developments.
Apologies if it was covered on the GAF thread, but I'm curious as to what you and others think about the frat-like atmosphere among officers and contemporary music in the party scene. It seems odd to think that folks would get the inclination to use a centuries old song as a party banger, but I suppose it goes with the idea that people are more tolerant of different interests such as period music. I don't think it stretches belief all that much that people will still occasionally let loose on their off time by getting sloshed and silly either.
I'm someone who is more on board with those kind of things since my involvement with Trek mostly consists of cherry picked episodes of TNG and in no way do I have a specific understanding of what the tone should be.
My friend from boardgame nights is a die-hard "not my Trek!" type and expressed his hate for the scene. I suspect he made up his mind on this before the show aired, but he continues to watch and vehemently rails against anything done differently than it had been before.
I really tried but I can't do it anymore. This is terrible, this is not Star Trek.
RIP Star Trek 1966-2005.
Yes, I know, but the term itself is sexist because there's no reason to invent a term specifically to criticize those traits in a woman.
Isn't the Discovery's crew supposed to be like the smartest Federation science guys (plus the single smartest Vulcan Academy scholar ever)? And this it what their partys look like? Seems like a pretty sad future to me tbh :-(
Isn't the Discovery's crew supposed to be like the smartest Federation science guys (plus the single smartest Vulcan Academy scholar ever)? And this it what their partys look like? Seems like a pretty sad future to me tbh