ProPublica has reported that a long running federal lawsuit against Saudi Arabia that involves the 2001 9/11 attacks has gathered new information that suggests that at least 2 Saudi officials may have deliberately assisted the hijackers of 9/11. ProPublica reports that this lawsuit has gathered information that "were collected soon after the attacks but were never shared with key investigators," and that this information makes an argument "for a fundamental reassessment of the Saudi government's possible involvement with the hijackers." This lawsuit has also even "raised questions about whether the FBI and CIA, which repeatedly dismissed the significance of Saudi links to the hijackers, mishandled or deliberately downplayed evidence of the kingdom's possible complicity" A former FBI agent involved with investigating 9/11 who had "pursued the Saudi connections for almost 15 years" has asked: "Why is this information coming out now?" and stated that "We should have had all of this three or four weeks after 9/11.":
At Least Two Saudi Officials May Have Deliberately Assisted 9/11 Hijackers, New Evidence Suggests
Newly revealed information also raises questions about whether the FBI and CIA mishandled or downplayed evidence of the kingdom’s possible ties to the plotters.
www.propublica.org
But now, 23 years after the attacks, new evidence has emerged to suggest more strongly than ever that at least two Saudi officials deliberately assisted the first Qaida hijackers when they arrived in the United States in January 2000.
Whether the Saudis knew the men were terrorists remains unclear. But the new information shows that both officials worked with Saudi and other religious figures who had ties to al-Qaida and other extremist groups.
Most of the evidence has been gathered in a long-running federal lawsuit against the Saudi government by survivors of the attacks and relatives of those who died. That lawsuit has reached a critical moment, with a judge in New York preparing to rule on a Saudi motion to dismiss the case.
Already, though, information put forward in the plaintiffs' case — which includes videos, telephone records and other documents that were collected soon after the attacks but were never shared with key investigators — argues for a fundamental reassessment of the Saudi government's possible involvement with the hijackers.
The court files also raise questions about whether the FBI and CIA, which repeatedly dismissed the significance of Saudi links to the hijackers, mishandled or deliberately downplayed evidence of the kingdom's possible complicity in the attacks that killed 2,977 people and injured thousands more.
"Why is this information coming out now?" asked retired FBI agent Daniel Gonzalez, who pursued the Saudi connections for almost 15 years. "We should have had all of this three or four weeks after 9/11."