New York Times chairman pushes for constant negative coverage of Biden + his age because he never granted them an interview
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
Just come out and endorse Trump already. I at least respect that The Post is upfront about it.
The real guy is much more punchable.
That's an actor, the poster was making a joke(?).
The real guy is much more punchable.
Are you sure that's not fresh off of Shutterstock?Just come out and endorse Trump already. I at least respect that The Post is upfront about it.
That's an actor, the poster was making a joke(?).
The real guy is much more punchable.
Yeah he played as a newspaper owner in Downton Abbey, and he weaponized his power, especially to those who didn't give him what he wanted.
Picture of the man
Somehow despite never seeing a picture of him this looks exactly as I figured. I hope a piano falls on him.
He looks like a Unity asset.Just come out and endorse Trump already. I at least respect that The Post is upfront about it.
That's an actor, the poster was making a joke(?).
The real guy is much more punchable.
Just come out and endorse Trump already. I at least respect that The Post is upfront about it.
That's an actor, the poster was making a joke(?).
The real guy is much more punchable.
That'll teach me about reading the entire thing before posting.
Still want to give him a wedgie though.
In case anyone wants to read someone write what they're probably thinking, here's Jeff "how-have-I-not-had-a-stroke-yet" Tiedrich talking about the Times.
www.jefftiedrich.com
the New York Times can piss up a rope
Times publisher AG Sulzberger is a power-mad diaper-baby
www.jefftiedrich.com
He looks like someone who would be in the Court of Owls... 100 years ago.
I had no idea until I saw the Pitchbot tweets that the New York Times was basically run by a four-generation long dynasty. And knowing that, it becomes so much more believable that this guy is just throwing a fit. Like, of course he is. "wah wah my great grand daddy's paper gets to interview all the presidents wah wah! i don't want to be the first one to fail wah!"
User Banned (Permanently): Misrepresenting Moderation; History of Promoting Cross Thread Drama, Dismissive Commentary & Modwhining
Ah yes, the same newspaper which when criticised for biased coverage by Palestinian members in the Israel genocide thread resulted in every single one of them being banned. Some of those members left Era permanently. Shame on you B-Dubs.
They said they didn't think he was very funny which would be fair criticism with Jost(taste being subjective and all), but since it's the Times and he was pretty soft on Biden it forces me to give em the side eye anyway.
Last edited:
OP
OP
It's so transparent lol.
View: https://twitter.com/keithedwards/status/1786394606101303762?t=BnLkets3i3hBStAlO8oYOQ&s=19
View: https://twitter.com/keithedwards/status/1786394606101303762?t=BnLkets3i3hBStAlO8oYOQ&s=19
You can practically feel the bitterness out of the NYT push lol
No surprises here. Media really want Trump back.
Nobody is gonna remember what happened last night in a couple of weeks anyways, why are people losing their minds over this?
Where is their editorial calling for Trump to step aside for being a convicted felon?
Because we've trained ourselves to hoot and holler over anything that might be bad for Trump and lose our minds over anything that might be bad for Biden. By October, all the pundits giving the "replace Biden" rhetoric breath are going to look really stupid.
Lyndon Johnson once said that he could walk on water on the Potomac and the Washington Post would run a headline the next day saying the president can't swim.
I think about that quote a lot.
He made them money. The constant barrage of Trump's wild antics and statements sold subscriptions and got them massive ad revenue.
What they aren't considering is that most sane people are 100% over Trump so they aren't going to get the same kind of attention that they got 4 years ago.
Because Trump's insanity and the sensational headlines they can draw from it get eyes on their dying medium. Also, his constant threats towards them and the "failing NYT" rants he always went on got them subscribers. I mean CNN's CEO a few years ago basically said Trump was the best thing to happen to their network because people were always tuning in to hear what new insanity would come out of his mouth during those daily Covid briefings he did, but earlier as well when they would just have the camera focused on his empty podium for upwards of an hour before he even spoke. As much as he is focused on eyes and ratings, they are right up there with him in that regard.
What do they say about history repeating itself?
bsky.app
Josh Spiegel (@mousterpiece.bsky.social)
“Please do not check who won the 1968 presidential election.”
bsky.app
Even people here on Era are repeating the same shit. It's tiring.
There's only one choice this coming election. Go and VOTE.
The scrutiny surounding a literal fellon hasn't even been half as bad as this.
It's HILLARY'S E-MAILS all fucking over again, and it's tiring.
Go out and vote.
There's only one choice this coming election. Go and VOTE.
The scrutiny surounding a literal fellon hasn't even been half as bad as this.
It's HILLARY'S E-MAILS all fucking over again, and it's tiring.
Go out and vote.
This, all of this. Trump wants the Dems in chaos, that's the only way he wins.
Frankly, I don't give a damn if Biden is the nominee or not. At this point, I trust the Democrats to put a President in office that'll surround themselves by experts in their respective fields, and that's the bare minimum that the GOP cannot meet.
Picture of the man
That's an actor, the poster was making a joke(?).
The real guy is much more punchable.
My eyes parsed these two as Bob Odenkirk and David Cross. I honestly thought both of you were doing a bit.
This needs to be shouted from the mountains.
That's why Trump's "He doesn't fire anyone" attack failed in the debate. Biden doesn't need to fire anyone, One, because he isn't a baby who demands complete loyalty, and Two, and this is the bigger one, because they actually do a really, really good job. I wish Biden had highlighted how much his team has been instrumental in getting the nation back on the right track and those placements were done by him.
It's not that they eat it up. It's that it aligns with their interests. The same kind of people who shared right wing edited Dementia Joe clips as authentic because it appealed to their desire to damage Biden. Them and the closet accelerationists that we see inching closer and closer to outright advocating for a Trump win.
I don't see how people can watch that debate and conclude anything other than that Biden needs to step aside. He's a good man, but he is declining. If people don't get their head out of the sand, I think the Democrats are sleepwalking to defeat in November.
Trump has been declining since God knows when and it's been paying off for the GOP to invest in him.
You know, the 78-year old convicted criminal, con man and compulsive liar.
Democratic leaning voters and Republican leaning voters are not the same and do not behave the same
I don't see how people can watch one debate and conclude that Biden needs to step down. He was fine before and after the debate. Being sick can mess you up at any age.
People still want to push the fairy tale that there's some magical candidate who can easily beat Trump this year if switched mere months before the main election. Those people sound like the one with their heads in the sand. 🤷🏻
History also does not support the notion that replacing the current guy at this point will lead to anything but disaster.
But sure keep pushing for the magical charismatic replacement from nowhere.
We are in a new world and old political norms don't apply anymore.
A tv host/conman with zero political experience became president
Everyone has their own personalized newspaper in their pocket that gets more extreme the more you read it
Nothing is the same
Except most of the democratic demographic still follow old political norms. That's why they accepted Biden in the first place, since he was an established name.
Trump's literal selling point has always been that he's outside the old political norm. Now you want dems to also go against the old political norm too, except... hey, didn't you just say republican and democratic voters behave differently? Will democratic voters accept a detour from the old norms like republicans did?